ELVAE: Evidential Learning-Based Variational Autoencoder for Uncertainty-Aware Generation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.10398v1
• Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2026 02:45:59 GMT
• Title: ELVAE: Evidential Learning-Based Variational Autoencoder for Uncertainty-Aware Generation
• Abstract summary: Variational autoencoders generate samples from probabilistic latent representations but do not distinguish uncertainty about the latent location from variability around it.<n>We formulate ELVAE, an evidential learning-based VAE in which each latent coordinate is governed by an input-dependent normal-inverse-gamma posterior.<n>Low-uncertainty anchors support more reliable synthetic samples, while high-uncertainty anchors can be deliberately exploited for stress testing.
• Score: 7.5571037918649155
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Variational autoencoders generate samples from probabilistic latent representations but do not distinguish uncertainty about the latent location from variability around it. We formulate ELVAE, an evidential learning-based VAE in which each latent coordinate is governed by an input-dependent normal-inverse-gamma posterior. This hierarchy yields an explicit latent-location uncertainty that can be used during generation, not merely reported after inference: low-uncertainty anchors support more reliable synthetic samples, while high-uncertainty anchors can be deliberately exploited for stress testing. The objective is an exact evidence lower bound, and we show that direct regularization of the full hierarchy is required, since the marginalized latent law alone cannot identify the uncertainty decomposition. In an MNIST generation pilot with a frozen external classifier, this uncertainty clearly stratified the semantic reliability of generated digits. A zero-displacement control revealed that most of the effect reflects how reliably an anchor can be re-generated, while a smaller but distinct component is attributable to uncertainty-scaled perturbation itself. The effect holds only under within-class uncertainty ranking, and its magnitude varies across seeds. These findings support the learned latent-location uncertainty as a practical control variable for uncertainty-aware generation, separating anchor reliability from perturbation-induced failure.

Related papers

• Factor-Informed Uncertainty Distillation for Gaze Estimation [3.7508723681775606]
  We propose Factor-Informed Uncertainty Distillation (FIUD) to align uncertainty with interpretable image-quality failure modes.<n>A gradient-boosting teacher predicts expected gaze error from factors such as illumination, sharpness, eye visibility and symmetry.<n>A neural student distills these signals via curriculum learning and ranking supervision into a lightweight single-pass uncertainty head.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-22T12:20:40Z)
• Confidence-Gated Robot Autonomy: When Does Uncertainty Actually Help? [0.0]
  In threshold-gated autonomy, uncertainty matters mainly through its ability to rank likely errors.<n>We evaluate uncertainty using Spearman rank correlation, paired bootstrap equivalence testing, and act/defer agreement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-18T08:35:27Z)
• "I May Not Have Articulated Myself Clearly": Diagnosing Dynamic Instability in LLM Reasoning at Inference Time [1.570719611178015]
  Reasoning failures in large language models (LLMs) are typically measured only at the end of a generation, yet many failures manifest as a process-level breakdown.<n>We define a simple instability signal that combines consecutive-step distributional shift (JSD) and uncertainty (entropy)<n>Across GSM8K and HotpotQA, instability strength predicts wrong answers with above-chance AUC and yields monotonic bucket-level accuracy decline.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-02T22:11:25Z)
• Adaptive Dual Uncertainty Optimization: Boosting Monocular 3D Object Detection under Test-Time Shifts [80.32933059529135]
  Test-Time Adaptation (TTA) methods have emerged to adapt to target distributions during inference.<n>We propose Dual Uncertainty Optimization (DUO), the first TTA framework designed to jointly minimize both uncertainties for robust M3OD.<n>In parallel, we design a semantic-aware normal field constraint that preserves geometric coherence in regions with clear semantic cues.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-28T07:09:21Z)
• Uncertainty-Driven Reliability: Selective Prediction and Trustworthy Deployment in Modern Machine Learning [1.2183405753834562]
  This thesis investigates how uncertainty estimation can enhance the safety and trustworthiness of machine learning (ML) systems.<n>We first show that a model's training trajectory contains rich uncertainty signals that can be exploited without altering its architecture or loss.<n>We propose a lightweight, post-hoc abstention method that works across tasks, avoids the cost of deep ensembles, and achieves state-of-the-art selective prediction performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-11T02:33:53Z)
• TrustLoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation for Failure Detection under Out-of-distribution Data [62.22804234013273]
  We propose a simple failure detection framework to unify and facilitate classification with rejection under both covariate and semantic shifts.<n>Our key insight is that by separating and consolidating failure-specific reliability knowledge with low-rank adapters, we can enhance the failure detection ability effectively and flexibly.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-20T09:20:55Z)
• Probabilistic Modeling of Disparity Uncertainty for Robust and Efficient Stereo Matching [61.73532883992135]
  We propose a new uncertainty-aware stereo matching framework.<n>We adopt Bayes risk as the measurement of uncertainty and use it to separately estimate data and model uncertainty.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-24T23:28:20Z)
• Label-Confidence-Aware Uncertainty Estimation in Natural Language Generation [8.635811152610604]
  Uncertainty Quantification (UQ) is crucial for ensuring the safety and robustness of AI systems.<n>We propose a label-confidence-aware (LCA) uncertainty estimation based on Kullback-Leibler divergence bridging between samples and label source.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-10T07:35:23Z)
• Decomposing Uncertainty for Large Language Models through Input Clarification Ensembling [69.83976050879318]
  In large language models (LLMs), identifying sources of uncertainty is an important step toward improving reliability, trustworthiness, and interpretability. In this paper, we introduce an uncertainty decomposition framework for LLMs, called input clarification ensembling. Our approach generates a set of clarifications for the input, feeds them into an LLM, and ensembles the corresponding predictions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-15T05:58:35Z)
• Robustness and Accuracy Could Be Reconcilable by (Proper) Definition [109.62614226793833]
  The trade-off between robustness and accuracy has been widely studied in the adversarial literature. We find that it may stem from the improperly defined robust error, which imposes an inductive bias of local invariance. By definition, SCORE facilitates the reconciliation between robustness and accuracy, while still handling the worst-case uncertainty.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-21T10:36:09Z)
• Dense Uncertainty Estimation via an Ensemble-based Conditional Latent Variable Model [68.34559610536614]
  We argue that the aleatoric uncertainty is an inherent attribute of the data and can only be correctly estimated with an unbiased oracle model. We propose a new sampling and selection strategy at train time to approximate the oracle model for aleatoric uncertainty estimation. Our results show that our solution achieves both accurate deterministic results and reliable uncertainty estimation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-22T08:54:10Z)
• Localization Uncertainty Estimation for Anchor-Free Object Detection [48.931731695431374]
  There are several limitations of the existing uncertainty estimation methods for anchor-based object detection. We propose a new localization uncertainty estimation method called UAD for anchor-free object detection. Our method captures the uncertainty in four directions of box offsets that are homogeneous, so that it can tell which direction is uncertain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-28T13:49:30Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.