EvoMemBench: Benchmarking Agent Memory from a Self-Evolving Perspective
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.18421v1
- Date: Mon, 18 May 2026 13:54:38 GMT
- Title: EvoMemBench: Benchmarking Agent Memory from a Self-Evolving Perspective
- Abstract summary: EvoMemBench is a unified benchmark organized along two axes: memory scope and memory content.<n>We compare 15 representative memory methods with strong long-context baselines under a standardized protocol.<n>Results show that current memory systems are still far from a general solution.
- Score: 21.66000179149483
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Recent benchmarks for Large Language Model (LLM) agents mainly evaluate reasoning, planning, and execution. However, memory is also essential for agents, as it enables them to store, update, and retrieve information over time. This ability remains under-evaluated, largely because existing benchmarks do not provide a systematic way to assess memory mechanisms. In this paper, we study agent memory from a self-evolving perspective and introduce EvoMemBench, a unified benchmark organized along two axes: memory scope (in-episode vs. cross-episode) and memory content (knowledge-oriented vs. execution-oriented). We compare 15 representative memory methods with strong long-context baselines under a standardized protocol. Results show that current memory systems are still far from a general solution: long-context baselines remain highly competitive, memory helps most when the current context is insufficient or tasks are difficult, and no single memory form works consistently across all settings. Retrieval-based methods remain strong for knowledge-intensive settings, whereas procedural and long-term memory methods are more effective for execution-oriented tasks when their stored experience matches the task structure. We hope EvoMemBench facilitates future research on more effective memory systems for LLM-based agents. Our code is available at https://github.com/DSAIL-Memory/EvoMemBench.
Related papers
- Mechanistic Attention Guidance for Agent Memory Refinement [32.57216046158823]
We show that retrieval-head attention provides a mechanistic signal for revealing segment-level memory utilization.<n>We propose Attention-Guided Memory Refinement (AGMR), a framework that uses utilization patterns revealed by attention to guide targeted segment-level memory updates.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-07-20T07:17:50Z) - Memory as a Controlled Process: Learned Adaptive Memory Management for LLM Agents [72.3752981234916]
Large Language Model (LLM) agents increasingly rely on external memory systems to accumulate experience across tasks.<n>We present Memory as a Controlled Process (MemCon), a framework that models memory operations as a Markov Decision Process.<n>MemCon consistently outperforms multiple memory baselines by up to 15.2 points in task success while reducing token consumption by 5-20%.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-07-15T08:32:40Z) - MemSyco-Bench: Benchmarking Sycophancy in Agent Memory [32.49512092540906]
MemSyco-Bench is a benchmark for evaluating memory-induced sycophancy in agent systems.<n>MemSyco-Bench measures when memory should influence a decision and how valid memory should be used.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-07-01T15:30:33Z) - Is One Score Enough? Rethinking the Evaluation of Sequentially Evolving LLM Memory [50.857546269660276]
We introduce SeqMem-Eval, a diagnostic evaluation framework for sequentially evolving large language models (LLMs) memory.<n>Rather than focusing only on final performance, SeqMem-Eval evaluates how memory states evolve, generalize, consolidate experience, and retain useful information during sequential inference.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-14T20:15:22Z) - RoboMME: Benchmarking and Understanding Memory for Robotic Generalist Policies [54.23445842621374]
Memory is critical for long-horizon and history-dependent robotic manipulation.<n>Recent vision-language-action (VLA) models have begun to incorporate memory mechanisms.<n>We introduce RoboMME: a large-scale standardized benchmark for evaluating and advancing VLA models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-04T21:59:32Z) - According to Me: Long-Term Personalized Referential Memory QA [27.402232752643275]
ATM-Bench is the first benchmark for multimodal, multi-source personalized referential Memory QA.<n>Guided Memory (SGM) structurally represents memory items originated from different sources.<n>We find poor performance (under 20% accuracy) on the ATM-Bench-Hard set.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-02T15:42:29Z) - MemoryArena: Benchmarking Agent Memory in Interdependent Multi-Session Agentic Tasks [55.145729491377374]
Existing evaluations of agents with memory typically assess memorization and action in isolation.<n>We introduce MemoryArena, a unified evaluation gym for benchmarking agent memory in multi-session Memory-Agent-Environment loops.<n> MemoryArena supports evaluation across web navigation, preference-constrained planning, progressive information search, and sequential formal reasoning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-18T09:49:14Z) - Graph-based Agent Memory: Taxonomy, Techniques, and Applications [63.70340159016138]
Memory emerges as the core module in the Large Language Model (LLM)-based agents for long-horizon complex tasks.<n>Among diverse paradigms, graph stands out as a powerful structure for agent memory due to the intrinsic capabilities to model relational dependencies.<n>This survey presents a comprehensive review of agent memory from the graph-based perspective.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-05T13:49:05Z) - Agentic Memory: Learning Unified Long-Term and Short-Term Memory Management for Large Language Model Agents [57.38404718635204]
Large language model (LLM) agents face fundamental limitations in long-horizon reasoning due to finite context windows.<n>Existing methods typically handle long-term memory (LTM) and short-term memory (STM) as separate components.<n>We propose Agentic Memory (AgeMem), a unified framework that integrates LTM and STM management directly into the agent's policy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-05T08:24:16Z) - Evaluating Long-Term Memory for Long-Context Question Answering [100.1267054069757]
We present a systematic evaluation of memory-augmented methods using LoCoMo, a benchmark of synthetic long-context dialogues annotated for question-answering tasks.<n>Our findings show that memory-augmented approaches reduce token usage by over 90% while maintaining competitive accuracy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-27T18:03:50Z) - Multiple Memory Systems for Enhancing the Long-term Memory of Agent [9.43633399280987]
Existing methods, such as MemoryBank and A-MEM, have poor quality of stored memory content.<n>We have designed a multiple memory system inspired by cognitive psychology theory.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-21T06:29:42Z) - Evaluating Memory in LLM Agents via Incremental Multi-Turn Interactions [22.190297901876278]
We identify four core competencies essential for memory agents: accurate retrieval, test-time learning, long-range understanding, and selective forgetting.<n>Existing benchmarks either rely on limited context lengths or are tailored for static, long-context settings like book-based QA.<n>We introduce MemoryAgentBench, a new benchmark specifically designed for memory agents.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-07T17:59:54Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.