Position: Let's Develop Data Probes to Fundamentally Understand How Data Affects LLM Performance

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.18801v1
• Date: Mon, 11 May 2026 11:44:40 GMT
• Title: Position: Let's Develop Data Probes to Fundamentally Understand How Data Affects LLM Performance
• Abstract summary: We advocate for the need of developing systematic methodologies for generating synthetic sequences from appropriately defined random processes.<n>By observing LLM behavior on data probes, researchers can systematically conduct studies on how data characteristics influence model performance, generalization, and robustness.
• Score: 33.08440302959991
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Data is fundamental to large language models (LLMs). However, understanding of what makes certain data useful for different stages of an LLM workflow, including training, tuning, alignment, in-context learning, etc., and why, remains an open question. Current approaches rely heavily on extensive experimentation with large public datasets to obtain empirical heuristics for data filtering and dataset construction. These approaches are compute intensive and lack a principled way of understanding the essence of how specific data characteristics drive LLM behavior. In this position paper, we advocate for the need of developing systematic methodologies for generating synthetic sequences from appropriately defined random processes, with the goal that these sequences can reveal useful characteristics when they are used in one or multiple stages of the LLM workflow. We refer to such sequences as data probes. By observing LLM behavior on data probes, researchers can systematically conduct studies on how data characteristics influence model performance, generalization, and robustness. The probing sequences exhibit statistical properties that can be viewed using theoretical concepts, such as typical sets, which are generalized to describe the behaviors of LLMs. This data-probe approach provides a pathway for uncovering foundational insights into the role of data in LLM training and inference, beyond empirical heuristics.

Related papers

• Subliminal Effects in Your Data: A General Mechanism via Log-Linearity [39.40622797996004]
  Training modern large language models (LLMs) has become a veritable smorgasbord of algorithms and datasets designed to elicit particular behaviors.<n>Recent experiments show datasets can transmit signals that are not directly observable from individual datapoints.<n>We uncover a general mechanism through which hidden subtexts can arise in generic datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-04T18:50:46Z)
• Can LLMs Clean Up Your Mess? A Survey of Application-Ready Data Preparation with LLMs [66.63911043019294]
  Data preparation aims to denoise raw datasets, uncover cross-dataset relationships, and extract valuable insights from them.<n>This paper focuses on the use of LLM techniques to prepare data for diverse downstream tasks.<n>We introduce a task-centric taxonomy that organizes the field into three major tasks: data cleaning, standardization, error processing, imputation, data integration, and data enrichment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-22T12:02:45Z)
• Bayesian Network Structure Discovery Using Large Language Models [27.478536621589345]
  We propose a unified framework for Bayesian network structure discovery.<n>Our framework places large language models (LLMs) at the center, supporting both data-free and data-aware settings.<n> Experiments demonstrate that our method significantly outperforms both existing LLM-based approaches and traditional data-driven algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-01T14:32:52Z)
• Low-Perplexity LLM-Generated Sequences and Where To Find Them [0.0]
  We introduce a systematic approach centered on analyzing low-perplexity sequences - high-probability text spans generated by the model.<n>Our pipeline reliably extracts such long sequences across diverse topics while avoiding degeneration, then traces them back to their sources in the training data.<n>For those that do match, we quantify the distribution of occurrences across source documents, highlighting the scope and nature of verbatim recall.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-02T15:58:51Z)
• Diversity as a Reward: Fine-Tuning LLMs on a Mixture of Domain-Undetermined Data [54.3895971080712]
  Fine-tuning large language models (LLMs) using diverse datasets is crucial for enhancing their overall performance across various domains.<n>We propose a new method that gives the LLM a dual identity: an output model to cognitively probe and select data based on diversity reward, as well as an input model to be tuned with the selected data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-05T17:21:01Z)
• 60 Data Points are Sufficient to Fine-Tune LLMs for Question-Answering [50.12622877002846]
  Large language models (LLMs) encode extensive world knowledge through pre-training on massive datasets, which can be fine-tuned for the question-answering (QA) task.<n>We categorize supervised fine-tuning (SFT) data based on the extent of knowledge memorized by the pretrained LLMs.<n>Our experiments show that as few as 60 data points during the SFT stage can activate the knowledge encoded during pre-training, enabling LLMs to perform the QA task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-24T07:38:38Z)
• SELF-GUIDE: Better Task-Specific Instruction Following via Self-Synthetic Finetuning [70.21358720599821]
  Large language models (LLMs) hold the promise of solving diverse tasks when provided with appropriate natural language prompts. We propose SELF-GUIDE, a multi-stage mechanism in which we synthesize task-specific input-output pairs from the student LLM. We report an absolute improvement of approximately 15% for classification tasks and 18% for generation tasks in the benchmark's metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-16T04:41:58Z)
• Entropy Law: The Story Behind Data Compression and LLM Performance [115.70395740286422]
  We find that model performance is negatively correlated to the compression ratio of training data, which usually yields a lower training loss. Based on the findings of the entropy law, we propose a quite efficient and universal data selection method. We also present an interesting application of entropy law that can detect potential performance risks at the beginning of model training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-09T08:14:29Z)
• How Data Inter-connectivity Shapes LLMs Unlearning: A Structural Unlearning Perspective [29.924482732745954]
  Existing approaches assume data points to-be-forgotten are independent, ignoring their inter-connectivity.<n>We propose PISTOL, a method for compiling structural datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-24T17:22:36Z)
• Large Language Models for Data Annotation and Synthesis: A Survey [49.8318827245266]
  This survey focuses on the utility of Large Language Models for data annotation and synthesis.<n>It includes an in-depth taxonomy of data types that LLMs can annotate, a review of learning strategies for models utilizing LLM-generated annotations, and a detailed discussion of the primary challenges and limitations associated with using LLMs for data annotation and synthesis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-21T00:44:04Z)
• On Inter-dataset Code Duplication and Data Leakage in Large Language Models [4.148857672591562]
  This paper explores the phenomenon of inter-dataset code duplication and its impact on evaluating large language models (LLMs) Our findings reveal a potential threat to the evaluation of LLMs across multiple SE tasks, stemming from the inter-dataset code duplication phenomenon. We provide evidence that open-source models could be affected by inter-dataset duplication.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-15T19:46:40Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.