Worst-Group Equalized Odds Regularization for Multi-Attribute Fair Medical Image Classification

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.19214v1
• Date: Tue, 19 May 2026 00:35:02 GMT
• Title: Worst-Group Equalized Odds Regularization for Multi-Attribute Fair Medical Image Classification
• Abstract summary: We propose a worst-group equalized-odds margin regularizer.<n>It targets subgroup-level deviations on both the true positive and false positive sides at inference.<n>It consistently reduces disparities in Equalized Odds and Equalized Opportunity with minimal impact on AUC.
• Score: 2.811881431797407
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Diagnostic performance in medical AI varies systematically across demographic groups, yet subgroup AUC can mask clinically important disparities. At a fixed inference-time operating point, some groups may exhibit over-diagnostic behaviour, characterized by elevated true and false positive rates, while others show under-diagnostic patterns with reduced true and false positive rates. These opposing tendencies can cancel in aggregate AUCs while producing meaningful inequities in clinical decision-making. Motivated by the need to assess and mitigate such disparities at the operating point and across multiple demographic attributes simultaneously, we propose a worst-group equalized-odds margin regularizer. The proposed regularizer explicitly targets subgroup-level deviations on both the true positive and false positive sides at inference. At each update, the method identifies subgroups defined by explicit demographic attributes (e.g., age, sex, and race) that exhibit the most extreme margin deviations and applies a unified penalty, enabling fairness optimization across multiple demographic axes without requiring explicit intersectional constraints. Across two medical imaging datasets in realistic multi-label settings, our method consistently reduces disparities in Equalized Odds and Equalized Opportunity with minimal impact on AUC, preserving diagnostic performance while improving fairness.

Related papers

• Dementia Etiology Diagnosis via Collaborative Meta Knowledge Enhancement [81.27196033392559]
  We propose a Collaborative Meta Knowledge Enhancement (COME) framework for dementia etiology diagnosis.<n>COME injects multi-center acquisition semantics, source identifiers, and modality indicators as heterogeneity-aware embeddings into a unified Transformer architecture for scale-up training.<n>Our method achieves state-of-the-art in-domain performance with a mean macro-averaged AUC of 85.62% and a 4.29-point gain over the strongest baseline.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-24T04:26:47Z)
• Fairness Beyond Demographics: Optimizing Performance Across Appearance-Based Hidden Cohorts in Medical Imaging [9.646042362182866]
  We introduce the label-free hidden-cohort fairness (LHCF) training paradigm for medical image analysis.<n>LHCF focuses on fairness across latent subpopulations discovered from image appearance.<n>We demonstrate on our proposed fairness benchmark, HIDFairBench, that LHCF provides state-of-the-art fairness results on single and multiple demographic attributes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-28T12:07:24Z)
• Patient-Conditioned Adaptive Offsets for Reliable Diagnosis across Subgroups [11.237134615215977]
  We introduce HyperAdapt, a patient-conditioned adaptation framework that improves subgroup reliability while maintaining a shared diagnostic model.<n> Experiments across multiple public medical imaging benchmarks demonstrate that the proposed approach consistently improves subgroup-level performance without sacrificing overall accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-19T14:33:41Z)
• Developing Fairness-Aware Task Decomposition to Improve Equity in Post-Spinal Fusion Complication Prediction [3.860970992977915]
  We propose a fairness-aware multitask learning framework for postoperative complication prediction.<n> FAIR-MTL employs a data-driven subgroup inference mechanism.<n>It achieves an AUC of 0.86 and an accuracy of 75%, outperforming single-task baselines while substantially reducing bias.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-29T19:06:07Z)
• FAST-CAD: A Fairness-Aware Framework for Non-Contact Stroke Diagnosis [8.939811267715228]
  We propose FAST-CAD, a theoretically grounded framework that combines domain-adversarial training with group distributionally robust optimization.<n>Our approach is built on domain adaptation and minimax fairness theory and provides convergence bounds guarantees and fairness.<n>Experiments show that our method achieves superior diagnostic performance while maintaining fairness across demographic groups.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-12T01:40:58Z)
• Fair Deepfake Detectors Can Generalize [51.21167546843708]
  We show that controlling for confounders (data distribution and model capacity) enables improved generalization via fairness interventions.<n>Motivated by this insight, we propose Demographic Attribute-insensitive Intervention Detection (DAID), a plug-and-play framework composed of: i) Demographic-aware data rebalancing, which employs inverse-propensity weighting and subgroup-wise feature normalization to neutralize distributional biases; and ii) Demographic-agnostic feature aggregation, which uses a novel alignment loss to suppress sensitive-attribute signals.<n>DAID consistently achieves superior performance in both fairness and generalization compared to several state-of-the-art
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-03T14:10:02Z)
• Mitigating Subgroup Disparities in Multi-Label Speech Emotion Recognition: A Pseudo-Labeling and Unsupervised Learning Approach [53.824673312331626]
  Implicit Demography Inference (IDI) module uses k-means clustering to mitigate bias in Speech Emotion Recognition (SER)<n>Experiments show that pseudo-labeling IDI reduces subgroup disparities, improving fairness metrics by over 28%.<n>Unsupervised IDI yields more than a 4.6% improvement in fairness metrics with a drop of less than 3.6% in SER performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-20T14:50:44Z)
• FairREAD: Re-fusing Demographic Attributes after Disentanglement for Fair Medical Image Classification [3.615240611746158]
  We propose Fair Re-fusion After Disentanglement (FairREAD), a framework that mitigates unfairness by re-integrating sensitive demographic attributes into fair image representations.<n>FairREAD employs adversarial training to disentangle demographic information while using a controlled re-fusion mechanism to preserve clinically relevant details.<n> Comprehensive evaluations on a large-scale clinical X-ray dataset demonstrate that FairREAD significantly reduces unfairness metrics while maintaining diagnostic accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-20T22:17:57Z)
• Achieving Reliable and Fair Skin Lesion Diagnosis via Unsupervised Domain Adaptation [43.1078084014722]
  Unsupervised domain adaptation (UDA) can integrate large external datasets for developing reliable classifiers. UDA can effectively mitigate bias against minority groups and enhance fairness in diagnostic systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-06T17:32:38Z)
• Modeling the Q-Diversity in a Min-max Play Game for Robust Optimization [61.39201891894024]
  Group distributionally robust optimization (group DRO) can minimize the worst-case loss over pre-defined groups. We reformulate the group DRO framework by proposing Q-Diversity. Characterized by an interactive training mode, Q-Diversity relaxes the group identification from annotation into direct parameterization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-20T07:02:27Z)
• Fairness via Adversarial Attribute Neighbourhood Robust Learning [49.93775302674591]
  We propose a principled underlineRobust underlineAdversarial underlineAttribute underlineNeighbourhood (RAAN) loss to debias the classification head.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-12T23:39:28Z)
• Selective Classification Can Magnify Disparities Across Groups [89.14499988774985]
  We find that while selective classification can improve average accuracies, it can simultaneously magnify existing accuracy disparities. Increasing abstentions can even decrease accuracies on some groups. We train distributionally-robust models that achieve similar full-coverage accuracies across groups and show that selective classification uniformly improves each group.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-27T08:51:30Z)
• Mitigating Face Recognition Bias via Group Adaptive Classifier [53.15616844833305]
  This work aims to learn a fair face representation, where faces of every group could be more equally represented. Our work is able to mitigate face recognition bias across demographic groups while maintaining the competitive accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-13T06:43:37Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.