CLIF: Concept-Level Influence Functions for Transparent Bottleneck Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.19848v2
• Date: Sat, 23 May 2026 09:32:26 GMT
• Title: CLIF: Concept-Level Influence Functions for Transparent Bottleneck Models
• Abstract summary: We propose a novel approach using influence functions to enhance interpretability in NLP models at both the sample and concept levels.<n>Experiments on CEBaB and Yelp datasets show that influence functions effectively identify the most impactful training samples.
• Score: 31.932529831600558
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: In recent years, the black-box nature of deep learning models has limited their application in high-stakes domains such as medical diagnosis and finance, where interpretability is essential. To address this, we propose a novel approach using influence functions to enhance interpretability in NLP models at both the sample and concept levels. Experiments on CEBaB and Yelp datasets show that influence functions effectively identify the most impactful training samples, both helpful and harmful, on model predictions. By adjusting the labels and weights of these samples, we demonstrate that model performance can be restored to baseline levels without retraining, confirming the value of influence functions for efficient data debugging. Furthermore, our concept-level analysis identifies key concepts within Concept Bottleneck Models (CBM) that significantly affect predictions. Modifying these concepts alters model behavior observably, providing clear insights into the decision process.

Related papers

• Clarity: The Flexibility-Interpretability Trade-Off in Sparsity-aware Concept Bottleneck Models [12.322360020814516]
  Vision-Language Models (VLMs) are often treated as black-boxes, with limited or non-existent investigation of their decision making process.<n>We introduce the notion of clarity, a measure, capturing the interplay between the downstream performance and the sparsity and precision of the concept representation.<n>Our experiments reveal a critical trade-off between flexibility and interpretability, under which a given method can exhibit markedly different behaviors even at comparable performance levels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-29T16:28:55Z)
• Revisiting Data Attribution for Influence Functions [13.88866465448849]
  This paper comprehensively reviews the data attribution capability of influence functions in deep learning.<n>We discuss their theoretical foundations, recent algorithmic advances for efficient inverse-Hessian-vector product estimation, and evaluate their effectiveness for data attribution and mislabel detection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-10T11:15:07Z)
• Interpretable Reward Modeling with Active Concept Bottlenecks [54.00085739303773]
  We introduce Concept Bottleneck Reward Models (CB-RM), a reward modeling framework that enables interpretable preference learning.<n>Unlike standard RLHF methods that rely on opaque reward functions, CB-RM decomposes reward prediction into human-interpretable concepts.<n>We formalize an active learning strategy that dynamically acquires the most informative concept labels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-07T06:26:04Z)
• Influence Functions for Scalable Data Attribution in Diffusion Models [52.92223039302037]
  Diffusion models have led to significant advancements in generative modelling.<n>Yet their widespread adoption poses challenges regarding data attribution and interpretability.<n>We develop an influence functions framework to address these challenges.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-17T17:59:02Z)
• Explanatory Model Monitoring to Understand the Effects of Feature Shifts on Performance [61.06245197347139]
  We propose a novel approach to explain the behavior of a black-box model under feature shifts. We refer to our method that combines concepts from Optimal Transport and Shapley Values as Explanatory Performance Estimation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-24T18:28:19Z)
• Low-rank finetuning for LLMs: A fairness perspective [54.13240282850982]
  Low-rank approximation techniques have become the de facto standard for fine-tuning Large Language Models. This paper investigates the effectiveness of these methods in capturing the shift of fine-tuning datasets from the initial pre-trained data distribution. We show that low-rank fine-tuning inadvertently preserves undesirable biases and toxic behaviors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-28T20:43:53Z)
• Outlier Gradient Analysis: Efficiently Identifying Detrimental Training Samples for Deep Learning Models [24.073260299592675]
  In this paper, we establish a bridge between identifying detrimental training samples via influence functions and outlier gradient detection.<n>We first validate the hypothesis of our proposed outlier gradient analysis approach on synthetic datasets.<n>We then demonstrate its effectiveness in detecting mislabeled samples in vision models and selecting data samples for improving performance of natural language processing transformer models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-06T21:34:46Z)
• Influence Tuning: Demoting Spurious Correlations via Instance Attribution and Instance-Driven Updates [26.527311287924995]
  influence tuning can help deconfounding the model from spurious patterns in data. We show that in a controlled setup, influence tuning can help deconfounding the model from spurious patterns in data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-07T06:59:46Z)
• Influence Functions in Deep Learning Are Fragile [52.31375893260445]
  influence functions approximate the effect of samples in test-time predictions. influence estimates are fairly accurate for shallow networks. Hessian regularization is important to get highquality influence estimates.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-25T18:25:59Z)
• Explaining Black Box Predictions and Unveiling Data Artifacts through Influence Functions [55.660255727031725]
  Influence functions explain the decisions of a model by identifying influential training examples. We conduct a comparison between influence functions and common word-saliency methods on representative tasks. We develop a new measure based on influence functions that can reveal artifacts in training data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-14T00:45:23Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.