Eyes on VLM: Benchmarking Gaze Following and Social Gaze Prediction in Vision Language Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.19859v2
• Date: Thu, 21 May 2026 18:05:34 GMT
• Title: Eyes on VLM: Benchmarking Gaze Following and Social Gaze Prediction in Vision Language Models
• Abstract summary: We present EyeVLM, a systematic evaluation framework for gaze understanding in vision-language models (VLMs)<n>To assess gaze understanding capabilities, we focus on two core tasks. The first, gaze following, predicts the 2D location where a person is looking.<n>The second, social gaze prediction, requires social and relational reasoning over multi-person interactions.
• Score: 20.954224027029625
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Vision-language models (VLMs) have rapidly evolved into general-purpose multimodal reasoners with strong zero-shot generalization. In this context, VLMs could greatly benefit the analysis of human gaze and attention, a central task in human behavior understanding that requires reasoning about the physical scene as well as the activity, interactions, and social context. However, the extent to which VLMs can reliably understand human gaze and related attentional behaviors remains largely unexplored. In this work, we present EyeVLM, a systematic evaluation framework for gaze understanding in VLMs across two complementary dimensions: tasks and models. To assess gaze understanding capabilities, we focus on two core tasks. The first, gaze following, i.e., predicting the 2D location where a person is looking, has a geometric and visual processing focus, requiring a precise understanding of the human face, attention direction, 3D scene structure, and spatial grounding of attended targets. The second, social gaze prediction, requires social and relational reasoning over multi-person interactions (e.g., mutual gaze and shared attention), and may benefit more from the LLM semantic reasoning capabilities within VLMs. Regarding models, EyeVLM evaluates these tasks in two ways: a zero-shot setting with a diverse set of state-of-the-art open- and closed-source VLMs, exploring different prompting strategies; and a fine-tuning approach based on task-specific QA pairs, studying the impact of model scale and data scale. As benchmarks, we rely on existing gaze understanding datasets and perform a systematic comparison with state-of-the-art purely visual models. Overall, our results show that current VLMs lack precise gaze understanding capabilities. While standard training helps reduce the gap with visual models, significant improvements are still needed.

Related papers

• Revisiting Multi-Task Visual Representation Learning [52.93947931352643]
  We introduce MTV, a principled multi-task visual pretraining framework.<n>We leverage high-capacity "expert" models to synthesize dense, structured pseudo-labels at scale.<n>Our results demonstrate that MTV achieves "best-of-both-worlds" performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-20T11:59:19Z)
• Gaze-VLM:Bridging Gaze and VLMs through Attention Regularization for Egocentric Understanding [7.281396624646809]
  Eye gaze offers valuable cues about attention, short-term intent, and future actions.<n>We propose a gaze-regularized framework that enhances VLMs for two key egocentric understanding tasks.<n>We introduce a gaze-regularized attention mechanism that aligns model focus with human visual gaze.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-24T11:33:03Z)
• VLM4D: Towards Spatiotemporal Awareness in Vision Language Models [66.833085504228]
  We introduce V4DLM, the first benchmark specifically designed to evaluate visual language models (VLMs)<n>Our benchmark comprises diverse real-world and synthetic videos accompanied by carefully curated question-answer pairs.<n>We identify significant performance gaps compared to human baselines, highlighting fundamental deficiencies in existing models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-04T06:06:06Z)
• Hidden in plain sight: VLMs overlook their visual representations [48.83628674170634]
  We compare vision language models (VLMs) to their visual encoders to understand their ability to integrate across these modalities.<n>We find that VLMs perform substantially worse than their visual encoders, dropping to near-chance performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-09T17:59:54Z)
• MMPerspective: Do MLLMs Understand Perspective? A Comprehensive Benchmark for Perspective Perception, Reasoning, and Robustness [50.33343842822694]
  We introduce MMPerspective, the first benchmark specifically designed to evaluate multimodal large language models' understanding of perspective.<n>Our benchmark comprises 2,711 real-world and synthetic image instances with 5,083 question-answer pairs that probe key capabilities.<n>Through a comprehensive evaluation of 43 state-of-the-art MLLMs, we uncover significant limitations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-26T18:20:22Z)
• Caption This, Reason That: VLMs Caught in the Middle [3.4820139118440676]
  Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have shown remarkable progress in visual understanding in recent years.<n>They still lag behind human capabilities in specific visual tasks such as counting or relational reasoning.<n>We analyze VLM performance along core cognitive axes: Perception, Attention, and Memory.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-24T14:25:48Z)
• iVISPAR -- An Interactive Visual-Spatial Reasoning Benchmark for VLMs [4.34964016971127]
  iVISPAR is an interactive benchmark designed to evaluate the spatial reasoning capabilities of Vision-Language Models (VLMs) acting as agents.<n>The benchmark supports visual 3D, 2D, and text-based input modalities, enabling comprehensive assessments of VLMs' planning and reasoning skills.<n>Results indicate that while VLMs perform better on 2D tasks compared to 3D or text-based settings, they struggle with complex spatial configurations and consistently fall short of human performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-05T14:29:01Z)
• VSP: Assessing the dual challenges of perception and reasoning in spatial planning tasks for VLMs [102.36953558562436]
  Vision language models (VLMs) are an exciting emerging class of language models (LMs) One understudied capability inVLMs is visual spatial planning. Our study introduces a benchmark that evaluates the spatial planning capability in these models in general.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-02T00:24:01Z)
• Prismatic VLMs: Investigating the Design Space of Visually-Conditioned Language Models [73.40350756742231]
  Visually-conditioned language models (VLMs) have seen growing adoption in applications such as visual dialogue, scene understanding, and robotic task planning. Despite the volume of new releases, key design decisions around image preprocessing, architecture, and optimization are under-explored.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-12T18:21:14Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.