Personality Engineering with AI Agents: A New Methodology for Negotiation Research

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.20554v1
• Date: Tue, 19 May 2026 23:11:19 GMT
• Title: Personality Engineering with AI Agents: A New Methodology for Negotiation Research
• Abstract summary: We introduce personality engineering: a methodology that uses AI agents to precisely parameterize, manipulate, and evaluate negotiator personality.<n>We propose using the interpersonal circumplex--and its two core dimensions of warmth and dominance--as a foundational coordinate system for the field.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: According to canonical negotiation theory, people's success in a negotiation depends on how well they balance competing demands--empathizing and asserting, demonstrating concern for other and concern for self, being soft on the people and hard on the problem. Yet people struggle to manage these tensions, so researchers have lacked the ability to rigorously test the field's prescriptions under controlled conditions. AI agents do not face the same limitations, and their precision, repertoire, consistency, and scalability enable a new class of experiments to contribute to negotiation theory. In this article, we introduce personality engineering: a methodology that uses AI agents to precisely parameterize, manipulate, and evaluate negotiator personality. We propose using the interpersonal circumplex--and its two core dimensions of warmth and dominance--as a foundational coordinate system for the field. This approach offers both a rigorous methodology for testing classic negotiation theories and a practical guide for designing the personalities of AI negotiation agents.

Related papers

• Characterizing initial human-AI proof formalization workflows [66.06866890889131]
  Advances in AI systems' ability to generate code and engage in increasingly high-level mathematical reasoning promise to transform people's ability to formalize and thereby verify proofs.<n>We conduct a mixed-methods analysis into the initial impact of AI on people's formalization.<n>A qualitative survey shows that people's preferences are diverse, but with a general desire for AI assistance in formalization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-02T22:58:19Z)
• From Overload to Convergence: Supporting Multi-Issue Human-AI Negotiation with Bayesian Visualization [4.511923587827302]
  We design a human-AI negotiation case study in a realistic property rental scenario.<n> empirical findings show that performance stays stable up to three issues but declines as additional issues increase cognitive load.<n>We introduce a novel uncertainty-based visualization driven by Bayesian estimation of agreement probability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-24T03:49:21Z)
• EQ-Negotiator: Dynamic Emotional Personas Empower Small Language Models for Edge-Deployable Credit Negotiation [66.09161596959771]
  Small language models (SLMs) offer a practical alternative, but suffer from a significant performance gap compared to large language models (LLMs)<n>This paper introduces EQ-Negotiator, a novel framework that bridges this capability gap using emotional personas.<n>We show that a 7B parameter language model with EQ-Negotiator achieves better debt recovery and negotiation efficiency than baseline LLMs more than 10 times its size.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-05T11:25:07Z)
• Does AI Coaching Prepare us for Workplace Negotiations? [15.57105036031543]
  We compare Trucey, a prototype AI coach, with a traditional negotiation Handbook.<n>The Handbook's comprehensive, reviewable content was crucial for participants' confidence and preparedness.<n>Although participants valued AI's rehearsal capability, its guidance often felt verbose and fragmented.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-26T16:21:24Z)
• Resource Rational Contractualism Should Guide AI Alignment [69.07915246220985]
  Contractualist alignment proposes grounding decisions in agreements that diverse stakeholders would endorse.<n>We propose Resource-Rationalism: a framework where AI systems approximate the agreements rational parties would form.<n>An RRC-aligned agent would not only operate efficiently, but also be equipped to dynamically adapt to and interpret the ever-changing human social world.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-20T18:57:13Z)
• Exploring Big Five Personality and AI Capability Effects in LLM-Simulated Negotiation Dialogues [16.07828032939124]
  This paper presents an evaluation framework for agentic AI systems in mission-critical negotiation contexts.<n>Using Sotopia as a simulation testbed, we present two experiments that systematically evaluated how personality traits and AI agent characteristics influence social negotiation outcomes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-19T00:14:56Z)
• Advancing AI Negotiations: New Theory and Evidence from a Large-Scale Autonomous Negotiations Competition [0.0]
  We conducted an International AI Negotiation Competition in which participants designed and refined prompts for AI negotiation agents.<n>We then facilitated over 180,000 negotiations between these agents across multiple scenarios with diverse characteristics and objectives.<n>Surprisingly, warmth--a traditionally human relationship-building trait--was consistently associated with superior outcomes across all key performance metrics.<n> Dominant agents, meanwhile, were especially effective at claiming value.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-09T03:25:48Z)
• How Performance Pressure Influences AI-Assisted Decision Making [52.997197698288936]
  We show how pressure and explainable AI (XAI) techniques interact with AI advice-taking behavior.<n>Our results show complex interaction effects, with different combinations of pressure and XAI techniques either improving or worsening AI advice taking behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-21T22:39:52Z)
• Position: Towards Bidirectional Human-AI Alignment [109.57781720848669]
  We argue that the research community should explicitly define and critically reflect on "alignment" to account for the bidirectional and dynamic relationship between humans and AI.<n>We introduce the Bidirectional Human-AI Alignment framework, which not only incorporates traditional efforts to align AI with human values but also introduces the critical, underexplored dimension of aligning humans with AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-13T16:03:25Z)
• NegotiationToM: A Benchmark for Stress-testing Machine Theory of Mind on Negotiation Surrounding [55.38254464415964]
  Theory of mind evaluations currently focuses on testing models using machine-generated data or game settings prone to shortcuts and spurious correlations. We introduce NegotiationToM, a new benchmark designed to stress-test machine ToM in real-world negotiation surrounding covered multi-dimensional mental states.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-21T11:51:13Z)
• Be Selfish, But Wisely: Investigating the Impact of Agent Personality in Mixed-Motive Human-Agent Interactions [24.266490660606497]
  We find that self-play RL fails to learn the value of compromise in a negotiation. We modify the training procedure in two novel ways to design agents with diverse personalities and analyze their performance with human partners. We find that although both techniques show promise, a selfish agent, which maximizes its own performance while also avoiding walkaways, performs superior to other variants by implicitly learning to generate value for both itself and the negotiation partner.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-22T20:31:35Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.