Metaphors in Literary Post-Editing: Opening Pandora's Box?

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.21178v1
• Date: Wed, 20 May 2026 13:45:07 GMT
• Title: Metaphors in Literary Post-Editing: Opening Pandora's Box?
• Abstract summary: Post-editors of literary texts react and respond to the way metaphors have been translated.<n>Results show that one in three metaphors in the output were changed by the post-editors.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: This paper investigates how post-editors of literary texts react and respond to the way metaphors have been translated by Neu ral Machine Translation (NMT) and Large Language Models (LLMs). The results show that one in three metaphors in the output were changed by the post-editors, demonstrating that the translation of fig urative language is indeed problematic in literary MT (LitMT). The responses indi cate that the post-editors were aware of overly literal translations, though mostly for multiword expressions. Moreover, at times they found it difficult to determine whether solutions were acceptable. They rated the overall quality of the MT out put as quite poor and stated that the post editing was more work and more effort than it would have been translating from scratch. This supports previous studies ar guing that post-editing constrains transla tors in their creativity and diminishes their sense of text ownership.

Related papers

• A Rising Tide Lifts All Boats: MTQE Rewards for Idioms Improve General Translation Quality [13.512688251831902]
  Non-compositional expressions (e.g., idioms, proverbs, and metaphors) pose significant challenges for neural machine translation systems.<n>We investigate GRPO-style fine-tuning using Machine Translation Quality Estimation (MTQE) models as reward functions to train models to better translate idioms.<n>Using Chinese and Hindi datasets, we find that idiom translation abilities improve by 14 points, general, non-idiomatic translation implicitly improves by 8 points, and cross-lingual translation abilities (trained on one language, evaluated on another language) improves by 6 points.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-09T20:55:09Z)
• Liaozhai through the Looking-Glass: On Paratextual Explicitation of Culture-Bound Terms in Machine Translation [70.43884512651668]
  We formalize Genette's (1987) theory of paratexts from literary and translation studies to introduce the task of paratextual explicitation for machine translation.<n>We construct a dataset of 560 expert-aligned paratexts from four English translations of the classical Chinese short story collection Liaozhai.<n>Our findings demonstrate the potential of paratextual explicitation in advancing machine translation beyond linguistic equivalence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-27T16:27:36Z)
• DRT: Deep Reasoning Translation via Long Chain-of-Thought [73.21414200780171]
  We introduce DRT, an attempt to bring the success of long chain-of-thought to neural machine translation (MT)<n>We first mine sentences containing similes or metaphors from existing literature books, and then develop a multi-agent framework to translate these sentences via long thought.<n>Using Qwen2.5 and LLama-3.1 as the backbones, DRT models can learn the thought process during machine translation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-23T11:55:33Z)
• That was the last straw, we need more: Are Translation Systems Sensitive to Disambiguating Context? [64.38544995251642]
  We study semantic ambiguities that exist in the source (English in this work) itself. We focus on idioms that are open to both literal and figurative interpretations. We find that current MT models consistently translate English idioms literally, even when the context suggests a figurative interpretation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-23T06:38:49Z)
• Crossing the Threshold: Idiomatic Machine Translation through Retrieval Augmentation and Loss Weighting [66.02718577386426]
  We provide a simple characterization of idiomatic translation and related issues. We conduct a synthetic experiment revealing a tipping point at which transformer-based machine translation models correctly default to idiomatic translations. To improve translation of natural idioms, we introduce two straightforward yet effective techniques.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-10T23:47:25Z)
• Do GPTs Produce Less Literal Translations? [20.095646048167612]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as general-purpose language models capable of addressing many natural language generation or understanding tasks. We find that translations out of English (E-X) from GPTs tend to be less literal, while exhibiting similar or better scores on Machine Translation quality metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-26T10:38:31Z)
• Exploring Document-Level Literary Machine Translation with Parallel Paragraphs from World Literature [35.1398797683712]
  We show that literary translators prefer reference human translations over machine-translated paragraphs at a rate of 84%. We train a post-editing model whose output is preferred over normal MT output at a rate of 69% by experts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-25T18:03:34Z)
• Can Transformer be Too Compositional? Analysing Idiom Processing in Neural Machine Translation [55.52888815590317]
  Unlike literal expressions, idioms' meanings do not directly follow from their parts. NMT models are often unable to translate idioms accurately and over-generate compositional, literal translations. We investigate whether the non-compositionality of idioms is reflected in the mechanics of the dominant NMT model, Transformer.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-30T17:59:32Z)
• Creativity in translation: machine translation as a constraint for literary texts [3.3453601632404073]
  This article presents the results of a study involving the translation of a short story by Kurt Vonnegut from English to Catalan and Dutch using three modalities: machine-translation (MT), post-editing (PE) and translation without aid (HT) A neural MT system trained on literary data does not currently have the necessary capabilities for a creative translation; it renders literal solutions to translation problems. More importantly, using MT to post-edit raw output constrains the creativity of translators, resulting in a poorer translation often not fit for publication, according to experts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-12T09:27:00Z)
• BitextEdit: Automatic Bitext Editing for Improved Low-Resource Machine Translation [53.55009917938002]
  We propose to refine the mined bitexts via automatic editing. Experiments demonstrate that our approach successfully improves the quality of CCMatrix mined bitext for 5 low-resource language-pairs and 10 translation directions by up to 8 BLEU points.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-12T16:00:39Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.