The Shape of Testimony: A Scalable Framework for Oral History Archive Comparison

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.21623v1
• Date: Wed, 20 May 2026 18:36:33 GMT
• Title: The Shape of Testimony: A Scalable Framework for Oral History Archive Comparison
• Abstract summary: Researchers in Holocaust studies have often distinguished between two styles of oral survivor testimony.<n>The USC Shoah Foundation's interviews tend to follow a structured, interviewer-guided format, whereas the Yale Fortunoff Video Archive favors a more free-form, open-ended style.<n>This study critically examines that claim by conducting a large-scale computational analysis of more than 1,600 testimonies from both collections.
• Score: 2.12833538322985
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Researchers in Holocaust studies have often distinguished between two styles of oral survivor testimony: the USC Shoah Foundation's interviews tend to follow a structured, interviewer-guided format, whereas the Yale Fortunoff Video Archive generally favors a more free-form, open-ended style. This distinction has influenced both scholarly research and the development of later archives. In this study, we critically examine that claim by conducting a large-scale computational analysis of more than 1,600 testimonies from both collections. Leveraging discourse segmentation, topic modeling, and large language model (LLM) based analysis, we quantify the "structuredness" level of testimonies through topic coherence, interviewer-survivor dynamics, and the distribution of question types. Our results generally corroborate the structural differences identified in earlier research, while also revealing significant overlaps between the collections, both within individual interviews and across common narrative patterns. This complicates the simple "structured vs. free-form" dichotomy often applied to these oral histories. Beyond revisiting a foundational claim in Holocaust studies, our work provides a scalable, replicable framework for comparative corpus analysis. As a proof of concept, it suggests broader applications for digital oral history, narrative analysis, and the design of citizen-science annotation platforms.

Related papers

• Floating or Suggesting Ideas? A Large-Scale Contrastive Analysis of Metaphorical and Literal Verb-Object Constructions [53.690096725532726]
  We analyze 297 English verb-object pairs (e.g., float idea vs. suggest idea) in 2M corpus sentences.<n>Using five NLP tools, we extract 2,293 cognitive and linguistic features capturing affective, lexical, syntactic, and discourse-level properties.<n>Cross-pair results show literal contexts have higher lexical frequency, cohesion, and structural regularity, while metaphorical contexts show greater affective load, imageability, lexical diversity, and constructional specificity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-09T14:08:57Z)
• Listening Between the Lines: Decoding Podcast Narratives with Language Modeling [17.51119928424848]
  We show that existing large language models, typically trained on more structured text such as news articles, struggle to capture subtle cues that human listeners rely on to identify narrative frames.<n>Our approach then uses these granular frame labels to reveal broader discourse trends.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-07T15:12:06Z)
• Large Language Models for Oral History Understanding with Text Classification and Sentiment Analysis [0.25165775267615204]
  This paper presents a scalable framework to automate semantic and sentiment annotation for Japanese American Incarceration Oral History.<n>Using LLMs, we construct a high-quality dataset, evaluate multiple models, and test prompt engineering strategies.<n>For sentiment analysis, Llama slightly outperformed Qwen (82.66%) and ChatGPT (82.29%), with all models showing comparable results.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-08T22:06:23Z)
• Interactive Topic Models with Optimal Transport [75.26555710661908]
  We present EdTM, as an approach for label name supervised topic modeling. EdTM models topic modeling as an assignment problem while leveraging LM/LLM based document-topic affinities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-28T13:57:27Z)
• Identifying Narrative Patterns and Outliers in Holocaust Testimonies Using Topic Modeling [13.639727580099484]
  This paper uses advanced Natural Language Processing techniques to explore the USC Shoah Foundation Holocaust testimony corpus. By treating testimonies as structured question-and-answer sections, we apply topic modeling to identify key themes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-04T12:29:00Z)
• Towards Debiasing Frame Length Bias in Text-Video Retrieval via Causal Intervention [72.12974259966592]
  We present a unique and systematic study of a temporal bias due to frame length discrepancy between training and test sets of trimmed video clips. We propose a causal debiasing approach and perform extensive experiments and ablation studies on the Epic-Kitchens-100, YouCook2, and MSR-VTT datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-17T15:58:27Z)
• Disco-Bench: A Discourse-Aware Evaluation Benchmark for Language Modelling [70.23876429382969]
  We propose a benchmark that can evaluate intra-sentence discourse properties across a diverse set of NLP tasks. Disco-Bench consists of 9 document-level testsets in the literature domain, which contain rich discourse phenomena. For linguistic analysis, we also design a diagnostic test suite that can examine whether the target models learn discourse knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-16T15:18:25Z)
• Topics in the Haystack: Extracting and Evaluating Topics beyond Coherence [0.0]
  We propose a method that incorporates a deeper understanding of both sentence and document themes. This allows our model to detect latent topics that may include uncommon words or neologisms. We present correlation coefficients with human identification of intruder words and achieve near-human level results at the word-intrusion task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-30T12:24:25Z)
• Contrastive Learning for Neural Topic Model [14.65513836956786]
  adversarial topic models (ATM) can successfully capture semantic patterns of the document by differentiating a document with another dissimilar sample. We propose a novel approach to re-formulate discriminative goal as an optimization problem, and design a novel sampling method. Experimental results show that our framework outperforms other state-of-the-art neural topic models in three common benchmark datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-25T09:46:26Z)
• Author Clustering and Topic Estimation for Short Texts [69.54017251622211]
  We propose a novel model that expands on the Latent Dirichlet Allocation by modeling strong dependence among the words in the same document. We also simultaneously cluster users, removing the need for post-hoc cluster estimation. Our method performs as well as -- or better -- than traditional approaches to problems arising in short text.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-15T20:55:55Z)
• Ranking Enhanced Dialogue Generation [77.8321855074999]
  How to effectively utilize the dialogue history is a crucial problem in multi-turn dialogue generation. Previous works usually employ various neural network architectures to model the history. This paper proposes a Ranking Enhanced Dialogue generation framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-13T01:49:56Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.