Reflective Prompt Tuning through Language Model Function-Calling

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.21781v1
• Date: Wed, 20 May 2026 22:21:29 GMT
• Title: Reflective Prompt Tuning through Language Model Function-Calling
• Abstract summary: Reflective Prompt Tuning (RPT) is a framework that simulates the iterative workflow of human prompt engineers.<n>RPT improves over initial prompts by up to 12.9 points, remains competitive with state of the art, and improves confidence calibration.<n>Our analyses show that RPT is especially effective on multi-hop and mathematical reasoning.
• Score: 16.552558967042312
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have become increasingly capable of following instructions and complex reasoning, making prompting a flexible interface for adapting models without parameter updates. Yet prompt design remains labor-intensive and highly sensitive to formatting, phrasing, and instruction order, motivating automated prompt optimization methods that reduce manual effort while preserving inference-time flexibility. However, existing methods often search over prompt candidates or use fixed critique-refine pipelines driven by individual examples or small batches, limiting their ability to capture systematic error patterns and make targeted edits grounded in failure history. We propose Reflective Prompt Tuning (RPT), a framework that uses LLM function calling to simulate the iterative workflow of human prompt engineers. An LLM optimizer calls a diagnostic function that evaluates the target model over an entire optimization set, summarizes recurring failure modes, and returns a structured diagnostic report. The optimizer uses this report, together with an accumulated memory of prior reports, to revise the prompt for the next iteration. RPT further supports confidence-aware optimization by using calibration signals in diagnostic feedback and final prompt selection. Across three reasoning tasks, RPT improves over initial prompts by up to 12.9 points, remains competitive with state of the art, and improves confidence calibration. Our analyses show that RPT is especially effective on multi-hop and mathematical reasoning, producing targeted prompt revisions that align with diagnosed failure patterns and lead to gains in task performance and calibration.

Related papers

• CAST: Critique-Aware Supervision for Training Reliable Long-Horizon Tool-Calling Agents [66.9575676266637]
  Large language model (LLM) agents are increasingly deployed in long-horizon, interactive, and stateful environments.<n>In these settings, a single wrong action, such as refunding the wrong purchase, can cause irreversible task failure and must be intercepted before execution.<n>We develop CAST, a critique-aware training framework that converts sparse task outcomes into action-level supervision for critique learning and policy optimization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-31T01:59:51Z)
• Optimizing LLM Prompt Engineering with DSPy Based Declarative Learning [0.0]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown strong performance across a wide range of natural language processing tasks.<n>Their effectiveness is highly dependent on prompt design, structure, and embedded reasoning.<n>This paper presents a systematic study of DSPy-based declarative learning for prompt optimization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-06T17:17:57Z)
• RASPRef: Retrieval-Augmented Self-Supervised Prompt Refinement for Large Reasoning Models [0.0]
  We introduce Retrieval-Augmented Self-Supervised Prompt Refinement (RASPRef), a framework that improves prompts without requiring human annotations or task-specific supervision.<n>RASPRef directly treats the prompt as the optimization target and improves it through an iterative retrieval-guided refinement process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-27T21:49:21Z)
• Modular Prompt Optimization: Optimizing Structured Prompts with Section-Local Textual Gradients [0.8604557306886812]
  We introduce a schema-based prompt optimization framework that treats prompts as structured objects composed of fixed semantic sections.<n>We evaluate MPO on two reasoning benchmarks, ARC-Challenge and MMLU, using LLaMA-3 8B-Instruct and Mistral-7B-Instruct as solver models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-07T16:20:08Z)
• Improving Large Language Models Function Calling and Interpretability via Guided-Structured Templates [56.73907811047611]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated strong reasoning and tool-use capabilities.<n>LLMs often fail in real-world tool-interactions due to incorrect parameterization, poor tool selection, or misinterpretation of user intent.<n>We introduce a curriculum-inspired framework that leverages structured reasoning templates to guide LLMs through more deliberate step-by-step instructions for generating function callings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-22T17:55:14Z)
• Rethinking Prompt Optimization: Reinforcement, Diversification, and Migration in Blackbox LLMs [10.434732630519377]
  We propose a novel Automatic Prompt Optimization (APO) framework centered on enhancing the feedback mechanism.<n>To mitigate the noise inherent in LLM-generated feedback, we introduce a technique called feedback diversification.<n>Our approach consistently outperforms strong baselines, achieving significant accuracy improvements, faster convergence, and lower computational costs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-14T00:20:14Z)
• Can Prompt Difficulty be Online Predicted for Accelerating RL Finetuning of Reasoning Models? [65.18157595903124]
  This work investigates iterative approximate evaluation for arbitrary prompts.<n>It introduces Model Predictive Prompt Selection (MoPPS), a Bayesian risk-predictive framework.<n>MoPPS reliably predicts prompt difficulty and accelerates training with significantly reduced rollouts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-07T03:20:52Z)
• In-context Demonstration Matters: On Prompt Optimization for Pseudo-Supervision Refinement [71.60563181678323]
  Large language models (LLMs) have achieved great success across diverse tasks, and fine-tuning is sometimes needed to further enhance generation quality.<n>To handle these challenges, a direct solution is to generate high-confidence'' data from unsupervised downstream tasks.<n>We propose a novel approach, pseudo-supervised demonstrations aligned prompt optimization (PAPO) algorithm, which jointly refines both the prompt and the overall pseudo-supervision.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-04T03:39:28Z)
• Reference Trustable Decoding: A Training-Free Augmentation Paradigm for Large Language Models [79.41139393080736]
  Large language models (LLMs) have rapidly advanced and demonstrated impressive capabilities. In-Context Learning (ICL) and. Efficient Fine-Tuning (PEFT) are currently two mainstream methods for augmenting. LLMs to downstream tasks. We propose Reference Trustable Decoding (RTD), a paradigm that allows models to quickly adapt to new tasks without fine-tuning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-30T10:48:20Z)
• Are Large Language Models Good Prompt Optimizers? [65.48910201816223]
  We conduct a study to uncover the actual mechanism of LLM-based Prompt Optimization. Our findings reveal that the LLMs struggle to identify the true causes of errors during reflection, tending to be biased by their own prior knowledge. We introduce a new "Automatic Behavior Optimization" paradigm, which directly optimize the target model's behavior in a more controllable manner.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-03T09:48:54Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.