Are Large Language Models Good Prompt Optimizers?

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2402.02101v1
• Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2024 09:48:54 GMT
• Title: Are Large Language Models Good Prompt Optimizers?
• Authors: Ruotian Ma, Xiaolei Wang, Xin Zhou, Jian Li, Nan Du, Tao Gui, Qi Zhang, Xuanjing Huang
• Abstract summary: We conduct a study to uncover the actual mechanism of LLM-based Prompt Optimization. Our findings reveal that the LLMs struggle to identify the true causes of errors during reflection, tending to be biased by their own prior knowledge. We introduce a new "Automatic Behavior Optimization" paradigm, which directly optimize the target model's behavior in a more controllable manner.
• Score: 65.48910201816223
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: LLM-based Automatic Prompt Optimization, which typically utilizes LLMs as Prompt Optimizers to self-reflect and refine prompts, has shown promising performance in recent studies. Despite the success, the underlying mechanism of this approach remains unexplored, and the true effectiveness of LLMs as Prompt Optimizers requires further validation. In this work, we conducted a comprehensive study to uncover the actual mechanism of LLM-based Prompt Optimization. Our findings reveal that the LLM optimizers struggle to identify the true causes of errors during reflection, tending to be biased by their own prior knowledge rather than genuinely reflecting on the errors. Furthermore, even when the reflection is semantically valid, the LLM optimizers often fail to generate appropriate prompts for the target models with a single prompt refinement step, partly due to the unpredictable behaviors of the target models. Based on the observations, we introduce a new "Automatic Behavior Optimization" paradigm, which directly optimizes the target model's behavior in a more controllable manner. We hope our study can inspire new directions for automatic prompt optimization development.

Related papers

• Dynamic Rewarding with Prompt Optimization Enables Tuning-free Self-Alignment of Language Models [54.381650481255235]
  We introduce a new tuning-free approach for self-alignment, Dynamic Rewarding with Prompt Optimization (O) Our approach leverages a search-based optimization framework that allows LLMs to iteratively self-improve and craft the optimal alignment instructions. Empirical evaluations on eight recent LLMs, both open and closed-sourced, demonstrate that DRPO significantly enhances alignment performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-13T16:15:38Z)
• MAPO: Boosting Large Language Model Performance with Model-Adaptive Prompt Optimization [73.7779735046424]
  We show that different prompts should be adapted to different Large Language Models (LLM) to enhance their capabilities across various downstream tasks in NLP. We then propose a model-adaptive prompt (MAPO) method that optimize the original prompts for each specific LLM in downstream tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-04T18:39:59Z)
• Q*: Improving Multi-step Reasoning for LLMs with Deliberative Planning [53.6472920229013]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive capability in many natural language tasks. LLMs are prone to produce errors, hallucinations and inconsistent statements when performing multi-step reasoning. We introduce Q*, a framework for guiding LLMs decoding process with deliberative planning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-20T13:08:09Z)
• Self-Exploring Language Models: Active Preference Elicitation for Online Alignment [88.56809269990625]
  We propose a bilevel objective optimistically biased towards potentially high-reward responses to actively explore out-of-distribution regions. Our experimental results demonstrate that when fine-tuned on Zephyr-7B-SFT and Llama-3-8B-Instruct models, Self-Exploring Language Models (SELM) significantly boosts the performance on instruction-following benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-29T17:59:07Z)
• Revisiting OPRO: The Limitations of Small-Scale LLMs as Optimizers [15.809293135844756]
  We revisit OPRO for automated prompting with relatively small-scale Language Models (LLMs) OPRO shows limited effectiveness in small-scale LLMs, with limited inference capabilities constraining optimization ability. We suggest future automatic prompting engineering to consider both model capabilities and computational costs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-16T17:33:50Z)
• Exploring the True Potential: Evaluating the Black-box Optimization Capability of Large Language Models [32.859634302766146]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated exceptional performance in natural language processing tasks. This paper endeavors to offer deep insights into the potential of LLMs in optimization. Our findings reveal both the limitations and advantages of LLMs in optimization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-09T13:17:28Z)
• Unleashing the Potential of Large Language Models as Prompt Optimizers: An Analogical Analysis with Gradient-based Model Optimizers [108.72225067368592]
  We propose a novel perspective to investigate the design of large language models (LLMs)-based prompts. We identify two pivotal factors in model parameter learning: update direction and update method. In particular, we borrow the theoretical framework and learning methods from gradient-based optimization to design improved strategies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-27T15:05:32Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.