Robust Statistical Estimators with Bounded Empirical Sensitivity
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.21860v1
- Date: Thu, 21 May 2026 01:13:52 GMT
- Title: Robust Statistical Estimators with Bounded Empirical Sensitivity
- Abstract summary: We introduce a new measure of robustness for statistical estimators, which we call emphempirical sensitivity.<n>An estimator $hat $ has bounded empirical sensitivity if, with high probability over a dataset $X = (X_1, dots, X_n) sim mathcalDotimes n$, for any dataset $Y$ obtained by modifying at most $n$ points in $X$.<n>We show that this bound is tight up to logarithmic factors, by employing recent results for robust empirical mean estimation.
- Score: 8.813598035063167
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: We introduce a new measure of robustness for statistical estimators, which we call \emph{empirical sensitivity}. An estimator $\hat θ$ has bounded empirical sensitivity if, with high probability over a dataset $X = (X_1, \dots, X_n) \sim \mathcal{D}^{\otimes n}$, for any dataset $Y$ obtained by modifying at most $ηn$ points in $X$, we have that $\hat θ(Y)$ is close to $\hat θ(X)$. We study bounds on this quantity for the prototypical problem of Gaussian mean estimation. We prove new lower bounds, showing that for any estimator $\hat μ$ which achieves an optimal $\ell_2$-error bound of $O\left(\sqrt{d/n}\right)$, the empirical sensitivity is at least $Ω\left(η+ \sqrt{ηd/n}\right)$. The two terms arise due to obstructions on the mean and variance (via an Efron-Stein argument) of such an estimator. We show that this bound is tight up to logarithmic factors, by employing recent results for robust empirical mean estimation.
Related papers
- Algorithms for adaptive and heteroskedastic linear regression at the computational threshold [2.2359088001899736]
We study finite-sample linear regression in the presence of varied and unknown label noise.<n>In adaptive linear regression, the errors are drawn i.i.d. from an unknown distribution.<n>We introduce a (computationally inefficient) adaptive estimator that achieves so long as $p$ is a mixture of $k symmetric log-concave.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-08-19T00:17:22Z) - Finite-Sample Performance of Gradient Descent in Logistic Regression with Gaussian Design [28.74829605004241]
We characterize the finite-sample estimation performance and convergence behavior of gradient descent (GD) on the maximum likelihood objective (i.e., the logistic loss)<n>We show that GD linearly converges to a small neighborhood of $*$ achieving an $ell$ error of order $O(sqrt|*|5d/n)$.<n>We also establish a faster local linear convergence to the same statistical error under a large $(|*|_2)$ stepsize.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-19T18:43:41Z) - Information-Computation Tradeoffs for Noiseless Linear Regression with Oblivious Contamination [65.37519531362157]
We show that any efficient Statistical Query algorithm for this task requires VSTAT complexity at least $tildeOmega(d1/2/alpha2)$.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-12T15:42:44Z) - Active Subsampling for Measurement-Constrained M-Estimation of Individualized Thresholds with High-Dimensional Data [3.1138411427556445]
In the measurement-constrained problems, despite the availability of large datasets, we may be only affordable to observe the labels on a small portion of the large dataset.
This poses a critical question that which data points are most beneficial to label given a budget constraint.
In this paper, we focus on the estimation of the optimal individualized threshold in a measurement-constrained M-estimation framework.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-21T00:21:17Z) - Beyond likelihood ratio bias: Nested multi-time-scale stochastic approximation for likelihood-free parameter estimation [49.78792404811239]
We study inference in simulation-based models where the analytical form of the likelihood is unknown.<n>We use a ratio-free nested multi-time-scale approximation (SA) method that simultaneously tracks the score and drives the parameter update.<n>We show that our algorithm can eliminate the original bias $Obig(sqrtfrac1Nbig)$ and accelerate the convergence rate from $Obig(beta_k+sqrtfracalpha_kNbig)$.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-20T02:46:15Z) - Online Robust Mean Estimation [37.746091744197656]
We study the problem of high-dimensional robust mean estimation in an online setting.
We prove two main results about online robust mean estimation in this model.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-24T15:28:43Z) - Estimation and Inference in Distributional Reinforcement Learning [28.253677740976197]
We show that a dataset of size $widetilde Oleft(frac|mathcalS||mathcalA|epsilon2 (1-gamma)4right)$ suffices to ensure the Kolmogorov metric and total variation metric between $hatetapi$ and $etapi$ is below $epsilon$ with high probability.
Our findings give rise to a unified approach to statistical inference of a wide class of statistical functionals of $etapi$.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-29T14:14:53Z) - Statistical Inference of Constrained Stochastic Optimization via Sketched Sequential Quadratic Programming [53.63469275932989]
We consider online statistical inference of constrained nonlinear optimization problems.<n>We apply the Sequential Quadratic Programming (StoSQP) method to solve these problems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-05-27T00:34:03Z) - AI without networks [0.0]
We develop a network-free framework for AI incorporating generative modeling.
We demonstrate this framework with examples from three different disciplines - ethology, control theory, and mathematics.
We also propose an easily computed method of credit assignment based on this framework, to help address ethical-legal challenges raised by generative AI.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-07T05:50:02Z) - The Sample Complexity of Robust Covariance Testing [56.98280399449707]
We are given i.i.d. samples from a distribution of the form $Z = (1-epsilon) X + epsilon B$, where $X$ is a zero-mean and unknown covariance Gaussian $mathcalN(0, Sigma)$.
In the absence of contamination, prior work gave a simple tester for this hypothesis testing task that uses $O(d)$ samples.
We prove a sample complexity lower bound of $Omega(d2)$ for $epsilon$ an arbitrarily small constant and $gamma
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-12-31T18:24:41Z) - Optimal Mean Estimation without a Variance [103.26777953032537]
We study the problem of heavy-tailed mean estimation in settings where the variance of the data-generating distribution does not exist.
We design an estimator which attains the smallest possible confidence interval as a function of $n,d,delta$.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-11-24T22:39:21Z) - Multivariate mean estimation with direction-dependent accuracy [8.147652597876862]
We consider the problem of estimating the mean of a random vector based on $N$ independent, identically distributed observations.
We prove an estimator that has a near-optimal error in all directions in which the variance of the one dimensional marginal of the random vector is not too small.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-22T17:52:45Z) - Optimal Robust Linear Regression in Nearly Linear Time [97.11565882347772]
We study the problem of high-dimensional robust linear regression where a learner is given access to $n$ samples from the generative model $Y = langle X,w* rangle + epsilon$
We propose estimators for this problem under two settings: (i) $X$ is L4-L2 hypercontractive, $mathbbE [XXtop]$ has bounded condition number and $epsilon$ has bounded variance and (ii) $X$ is sub-Gaussian with identity second moment and $epsilon$ is
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-07-16T06:44:44Z) - Agnostic Learning of a Single Neuron with Gradient Descent [92.7662890047311]
We consider the problem of learning the best-fitting single neuron as measured by the expected square loss.
For the ReLU activation, our population risk guarantee is $O(mathsfOPT1/2)+epsilon$.
For the ReLU activation, our population risk guarantee is $O(mathsfOPT1/2)+epsilon$.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-05-29T07:20:35Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.