CLORE: Content-Level Optimization for Reasoning Efficiency
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.22211v1
- Date: Thu, 21 May 2026 09:16:27 GMT
- Title: CLORE: Content-Level Optimization for Reasoning Efficiency
- Abstract summary: We propose a content-level optimization framework that improves reasoning efficiency by editing correct on-policy rollouts.<n> CLORE uses an external augmentation model to delete repetitive segments, illegible or task-irrelevant content, and superfluous reasoning after the solution is established.<n> Experiments show that CLORE improves the accuracy--efficiency trade-off and remains compatible with GRPO, DAPO, Training Efficient, and ThinkPrune.
- Score: 25.563467006637833
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Reinforcement learning post-training has improved the reasoning ability of large language models, but often produces unnecessarily long, repetitive, or semantically opaque reasoning traces. Existing efficient reasoning methods mainly regulate response length through explicit budgets or length-aware rewards, leaving intermediate reasoning content weakly supervised. We propose CLORE, a content-level optimization framework that improves reasoning efficiency by editing correct on-policy rollouts. CLORE uses an external augmentation model to delete repetitive segments, illegible or task-irrelevant content, and superfluous reasoning after the solution is established, while preserving the final answer. The resulting augmented--original pairs are optimized with an auxiliary reference-free DPO objective alongside standard policy-gradient training. By restricting augmentation to correct trajectories and performing local deletion, CLORE keeps edited rollouts close to the policy distribution and mitigates off-policy mismatch. Experiments on DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-7B and Qwen2.5-Math-7B across five mathematical reasoning benchmarks show that CLORE improves the accuracy--efficiency trade-off and remains compatible with GRPO, DAPO, Training Efficient, and ThinkPrune. Content-level analyses further show that CLORE reduces repetitive reasoning, illegible content, and post-answer exploration, supporting content-level supervision as a complementary direction to length-level control.
Related papers
- Beyond Penalizing Mistakes: Stabilizing Efficiency Training in Large Reasoning Models via Adaptive Correct-Only Rewards [33.82648880607807]
Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) aims to reduce verbosity.<n> GRPO's group normalization creates divergent advantages when incorrect answers receive continuous length penalties.<n>To robustly prevent both failure modes, we propose ACOER.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-21T23:27:12Z) - CARE: Competence-Aware Reward Shaping for Adaptive Reasoning Length in Video-MLLMs [50.189987475377656]
We propose CARE, a competence-aware reward shaping framework for adaptive reasoning length optimization in multimodal reasoning.<n> CARE maintains a smoothed competence estimate via an exponential moving average of pass rates, and uses it to route training into progressive stages.<n>Experiments on multiple video reasoning and general video understanding benchmarks demonstrate that CARE consistently improves reasoning accuracy, stabilizes reinforcement learning, and significantly enhances token efficiency.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-18T08:28:26Z) - Stepwise Penalization for Length-Efficient Chain-of-Thought Reasoning [66.22060690012512]
Large reasoning models improve with more test-time computation, but often overthink, producing unnecessarily long chains-of-thought that raise cost without improving accuracy.<n>We propose Step-wise Adaptive Penalization (SWAP), a fine-grained framework that allocates length reduction across steps based on intrinsic contribution.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-27T20:23:59Z) - WS-GRPO: Weakly-Supervised Group-Relative Policy Optimization for Rollout-Efficient Reasoning [67.45237332694025]
Group Relative Policy Optimization is effective for training language models on complex reasoning.<n>We propose Weakly Supervised GRPO, which improves rollout efficiency by converting terminal rewards into correctness-aware guidance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-19T02:43:35Z) - Constraint-Rectified Training for Efficient Chain-of-Thought [60.52883907721588]
Chain-of-Thought (CoT) has significantly enhanced the reasoning capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>While longer reasoning traces can improve answer quality and unlock abilities such as self-correction, they also incur high inference costs and often introduce redundant steps, known as overthinking.<n>Recent research seeks to develop efficient reasoning strategies that balance reasoning length and accuracy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-13T02:13:45Z) - Structured Reasoning for Large Language Models [59.215789462977206]
We propose Structured Reasoning (SCR), a framework that decouples reasoning trajectories into explicit, evaluable, and trainable components.<n>SCR substantially improves reasoning efficiency and self-verification.<n>Compared with existing reasoning paradigms, it reduces output token length by up to 50%.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-12T04:04:01Z) - Reinforced Efficient Reasoning via Semantically Diverse Exploration [73.41112984160992]
Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) has proven effective in enhancing the reasoning of large language models (LLMs)<n>We propose reinforced efficient reasoning via semantically diverse explorations, i.e., ROSE, for LLMs.<n>Our method incorporates a semantic-entropy-based branching strategy and an $varepsilon$-exploration mechanism.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-08T15:56:44Z) - Leash: Adaptive Length Penalty and Reward Shaping for Efficient Large Reasoning Model [12.881680088950008]
Leash is a reinforcement learning framework for efficient reasoning in LLMs.<n>Leash reduces the average reasoning length by 60% across diverse tasks.<n>Our work thus presents a practical and effective paradigm for developing controllable and efficient LLMs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-25T07:16:26Z) - In-Token Rationality Optimization: Towards Accurate and Concise LLM Reasoning via Self-Feedback [38.915062716409686]
InTRO is a new framework that enables both token-level exploration and self-feedback for accurate and concise reasoning.<n>InTRO consistently outperforms other baselines, raising solution accuracy by up to 20% relative to the base model.<n>Its chains of thought are notably more concise, exhibiting reduced verbosity.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-13T01:47:06Z) - Thinking on the Fly: Test-Time Reasoning Enhancement via Latent Thought Policy Optimization [5.674809920704963]
Latent Thought Policy Optimization enhances LLM reasoning entirely at test time.<n>Experiments show that LTPO not only matches or surpasses strong baselines on standard tasks but also demonstrates remarkable robustness where others fail.<n>Most notably, on highly challenging AIME benchmarks where existing latent reasoning baselines collapse to near-zero accuracy, LTPO delivers substantial improvements.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-05T12:50:39Z) - Perception-Consistency Multimodal Large Language Models Reasoning via Caption-Regularized Policy Optimization [72.30168853571216]
multimodal large language models excel at tasks that integrate visual perception with symbolic reasoning.<n>CapPO integrates two key mechanisms: (1) a caption-based consistency regularization, which minimizes the divergence between responses conditioned on raw images and those conditioned on captions, and (2) a KL-weighted advantage estimation scheme, which adaptively scales reinforcement signals to strengthen perceptually consistent trajectories.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-26T04:32:26Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.