Beyond Penalizing Mistakes: Stabilizing Efficiency Training in Large Reasoning Models via Adaptive Correct-Only Rewards
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.22716v1
- Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2026 23:27:12 GMT
- Title: Beyond Penalizing Mistakes: Stabilizing Efficiency Training in Large Reasoning Models via Adaptive Correct-Only Rewards
- Abstract summary: Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) aims to reduce verbosity.<n> GRPO's group normalization creates divergent advantages when incorrect answers receive continuous length penalties.<n>To robustly prevent both failure modes, we propose ACOER.
- Score: 33.82648880607807
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Training large language models to reason efficiently is a critical challenge. While integrating length-penalizing rewards into Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) aims to reduce verbosity, it frequently triggers reward collapse, severely degrading reasoning capabilities. Through a systematic evaluation of various reward configurations, we identify the root mechanism: GRPO's group normalization creates divergent advantages when incorrect answers receive continuous length penalties. Consequently, methods penalizing the length of incorrect answers are structurally prone to collapse under sustained optimization. Furthermore, restricting penalties exclusively to correct answers avoids this primary failure, but leaves the model susceptible to a stochastic collapse driven by response over-compression. To robustly prevent both failure modes, we propose ACOER (Adaptive Correct-Only Efficiency Reward). ACOER eliminates the structural penalty loop by isolating brevity bonuses to correct completions and prevents stochastic compression via dynamic budget normalization and control-loop penalty adjustments. Evaluated across diverse mathematical reasoning benchmarks, ACOER improves overall accuracy compared to the base model while reducing token generation by over 60%, establishing a fundamentally stable approach for efficiency-aware optimization.
Related papers
- SVR: Self-Verifying Refinement via Joint Verdict-Confidence Reinforcement Learning for Adaptive Test-Time Compute [62.3458279176813]
Self-Verifying Refinement is an oracle-free multi-turn reinforcement learning framework.<n>It learns to use self-verification as a compute-control policy.<n>It achieves a macro-average accuracy of 0.563 with only 2.99 inference turns on average.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-07-30T16:20:58Z) - CLORE: Content-Level Optimization for Reasoning Efficiency [25.563467006637833]
We propose a content-level optimization framework that improves reasoning efficiency by editing correct on-policy rollouts.<n> CLORE uses an external augmentation model to delete repetitive segments, illegible or task-irrelevant content, and superfluous reasoning after the solution is established.<n> Experiments show that CLORE improves the accuracy--efficiency trade-off and remains compatible with GRPO, DAPO, Training Efficient, and ThinkPrune.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-21T09:16:27Z) - Learning from Failures: Correction-Oriented Policy Optimization with Verifiable Rewards [73.44333771806282]
Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) has emerged as an effective paradigm for improving the reasoning capabilities of large language models.<n>We propose Correction-Oriented Policy Optimization (CIPO), a simple and effective extension to RLVR that converts on-policy failed trajectories into correction-oriented supervision.<n>CIPO improves learning effectiveness while explicitly enhancing the model's ability to correct its own errors.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-14T08:22:21Z) - LEAD: Length-Efficient Adaptive and Dynamic Reasoning for Large Language Models [24.128148876541783]
Large reasoning models, such as OpenAI o1 and DeepSeek-R1, tend to become increasingly verbose as their reasoning capabilities improve.<n>These inflated Chain-of-Length trajectories (CoT) often exceed what the underlying problems require, wasting compute, latency, and context budgets.<n>We propose LEAD (Thought-Efficient Adaptive and Dynamic reasoning), a method that replaces statics with online, self-adaptive mechanisms.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-10T23:05:02Z) - Tackling Length Inflation Without Trade-offs: Group Relative Reward Rescaling for Reinforcement Learning [74.5532558466687]
Group Relative Reward Rescaling (GR$3$) is a general, continuous, and reward-dependent gating mechanism.<n> GR$3$maintains training dynamics and downstream performance comparable to standard GRPO.<n>It significantly mitigates length inflation, outperforming state-of-the-art length-regularized baselines.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-11T08:41:34Z) - Diffusion Controller: Framework, Algorithms and Parameterization [54.82539154511621]
We present a unified control-theoretic view that casts reverse diffusion sampling as state-only control within (generalized) linearly-solvable Markov Decision Processes.<n>Under this framework, control acts by reweighting the pretrained reverse-time transition kernels, balancing terminal objectives against an $f$-divergence cost.<n>Experiments on Stable Diffusion v1.4 show consistent gains in preference-alignment win rates and improved quality-efficiency trade-offs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-07T01:49:59Z) - Stepwise Penalization for Length-Efficient Chain-of-Thought Reasoning [66.22060690012512]
Large reasoning models improve with more test-time computation, but often overthink, producing unnecessarily long chains-of-thought that raise cost without improving accuracy.<n>We propose Step-wise Adaptive Penalization (SWAP), a fine-grained framework that allocates length reduction across steps based on intrinsic contribution.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-27T20:23:59Z) - WS-GRPO: Weakly-Supervised Group-Relative Policy Optimization for Rollout-Efficient Reasoning [67.45237332694025]
Group Relative Policy Optimization is effective for training language models on complex reasoning.<n>We propose Weakly Supervised GRPO, which improves rollout efficiency by converting terminal rewards into correctness-aware guidance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-19T02:43:35Z) - Constraint-Rectified Training for Efficient Chain-of-Thought [60.52883907721588]
Chain-of-Thought (CoT) has significantly enhanced the reasoning capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>While longer reasoning traces can improve answer quality and unlock abilities such as self-correction, they also incur high inference costs and often introduce redundant steps, known as overthinking.<n>Recent research seeks to develop efficient reasoning strategies that balance reasoning length and accuracy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-13T02:13:45Z) - DRPO: Efficient Reasoning via Decoupled Reward Policy Optimization [37.96314154235252]
We propose a novel framework that decouples the length-based learning signal of correct rollouts from incorrect ones.<n>With a 1.5B model, our method achieves 77% length reduction with only 1.1% performance loss on simple questions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-06T04:18:13Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.