At What Cost? Software Developers' Well-Being in the Age of GenAI

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.22349v1
• Date: Thu, 21 May 2026 11:35:31 GMT
• Title: At What Cost? Software Developers' Well-Being in the Age of GenAI
• Abstract summary: Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) is rapidly reshaping software development.<n>Excessive focus on such dimensions risks overlooking the critical implications for developer well-being.<n>GenAI tools can amplify cognitive load, introduce new forms of oversight labor, and escalate expectations around output and pace.
• Score: 6.363930998744341
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) is rapidly reshaping software development, with growing emphasis on accelerating productivity and optimizing performance. However, excessive focus on such dimensions risks overlooking the critical implications for developer well-being. GenAI tools can amplify cognitive load, introduce new forms of oversight labor, and escalate expectations around output and pace, contributing to stress, burnout, and diminished work-life balance. The GenAI movement is also transforming professional norms, altering career entry points, demanding continuous adaptation, and deepening inequalities in access and support. This position paper calls for a reorientation of the GenAI research agenda in software development and proposes a theoretical framework to move beyond narrow performance metrics toward investigations that also center on human experience, social context, and sustainable productivity.

Related papers

• RoboWits: Unexpected Challenges for Robotic Creative Problem Solving [58.58727722988084]
  We introduce RoboWits, a bi-manual robotic benchmark designed to evaluate cognitive reasoning, creative tool use, and robustness to unexpected conditions.<n>Using the pipeline, we curated 30 diverse seed tasks and 208 tasks with mutations and graded difficulty across geometry, material, and assembly-based reasoning.<n>Our results reveal a significant performance gap: while pre-trained VLAs exhibit preliminary success on seed tasks after single-task fine-tuning, they struggle to perform on mutated tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-28T17:57:15Z)
• The State of Generative AI in Software Development: Insights from Literature and a Developer Survey [4.097943522310277]
  This study integrates a literature review with a survey of 65 software developers.<n>Results show that GenAI exerts its highest impact in design, implementation, testing, and documentation.<n>79 % of survey respondents use GenAI daily, preferring browser-based Large Language Models over alternatives integrated directly in their development environment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-17T12:59:59Z)
• Artificial Intelligence as a Catalyst for Innovation in Software Engineering [0.0]
  This article explores how AI serves as a powerful catalyst for enhancing agility and fostering innovation.<n>The integration of AI (specifically through Machine Learning (ML) and Natural Language Processing (NLP))facilitates the automation of tedious tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-11T17:20:30Z)
• EmboCoach-Bench: Benchmarking AI Agents on Developing Embodied Robots [68.29056647487519]
  Embodied AI is fueled by high-fidelity simulation and large-scale data collection.<n>However, this scaling capability remains bottlenecked by a reliance on labor-intensive manual oversight.<n>We introduce textscEmboCoach-Bench, a benchmark evaluating the capacity of LLM agents to autonomously engineer embodied policies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-29T11:33:49Z)
• EvoCUA: Evolving Computer Use Agents via Learning from Scalable Synthetic Experience [44.734653745434834]
  We introduce EvoCUA, a native computer use agentic model.<n>Unlike static imitation, EvoCUA integrates data generation and policy optimization into a self-sustaining evolutionary cycle.<n>EvoCUA significantly outperforms the previous best open-source model, OpenCUA-72B.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-22T11:36:43Z)
• Developer Productivity with GenAI [17.44738403505224]
  We surveyed 415 software practitioners to capture their perceptions of productivity changes associated with AI-assisted development.<n>Results reveal limited overall productivity change, highlighting the productivity paradox in which developers become faster but do not necessarily create better software or feel more fulfilled.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-28T10:23:57Z)
• Modeling Developer Burnout with GenAI Adoption [7.774584001694508]
  We investigate the relationship between the adoption of GenAI and developers' burnout.<n>We first surveyed 442 developers across diverse organizations, roles, and levels of experience.<n>Our results show that GenAI adoption heightens burnout by increasing job demands, while job resources and positive perceptions of GenAI mitigate these effects.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-08T18:35:38Z)
• Enterprise Architecture as a Dynamic Capability for Scalable and Sustainable Generative AI adoption: Bridging Innovation and Governance in Large Organisations [55.2480439325792]
  Generative Artificial Intelligence is a powerful new technology with the potential to boost innovation and reshape governance in many industries.<n>However, organisations face major challenges in scaling GenAI, including technology complexity, governance gaps and resource misalignments.<n>This study explores how Enterprise Architecture Management can meet the complex requirements of GenAI adoption within large enterprises.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-09T07:41:33Z)
• From Defects to Demands: A Unified, Iterative, and Heuristically Guided LLM-Based Framework for Automated Software Repair and Requirement Realization [44.99833362998488]
  This manuscript signals a new era in the integration of artificial intelligence with software engineering.<n>We present a formalized, iterative methodology proving that AI can fully replace human programmers in all aspects of code creation and refinement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-06T14:54:21Z)
• Agent-Driven Automatic Software Improvement [55.2480439325792]
  This research proposal aims to explore innovative solutions by focusing on the deployment of agents powered by Large Language Models (LLMs) The iterative nature of agents, which allows for continuous learning and adaptation, can help surpass common challenges in code generation. We aim to use the iterative feedback in these systems to further fine-tune the LLMs underlying the agents, becoming better aligned to the task of automated software improvement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-24T15:45:22Z)
• The Role of Generative AI in Software Development Productivity: A Pilot Case Study [0.0]
  This paper investigates the integration of generative AI tools within software development. Through a pilot case study, we gathered valuable experiences on the integration of generative AI tools into their daily work routines. Our findings reveal a generally positive perception of these tools in individual productivity while also highlighting the need to address identified limitations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-01T21:51:33Z)
• Making Software Development More Diverse and Inclusive: Key Themes, Challenges, and Future Directions [50.545824691484796]
  We identify six themes around the theme challenges and opportunities to improve Software Developer Diversity and Inclusion (SDDI)<n>We identify benefits, harms, and future research directions for the four main themes.<n>We discuss the remaining two themes, Artificial Intelligence & SDDI and AI & Computer Science education, which have a cross-cutting effect on the other themes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-10T16:18:11Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.