Modeling Pathology-Like Behavioral Patterns in Language Models Through Behavioral Fine-Tuning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.22356v1
• Date: Thu, 21 May 2026 11:42:38 GMT
• Title: Modeling Pathology-Like Behavioral Patterns in Language Models Through Behavioral Fine-Tuning
• Abstract summary: Large language models are increasingly used as computational tools for modeling human-like behavior.<n>We introduce a behavioral induction framework that modifies model policies through fine-tuning on structured decision-making tasks.<n>We then test whether this behavioral optimization produces systematic changes in generative distributions.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Large language models are increasingly used as computational tools for modeling human-like behavior. We introduce a behavioral induction framework that modifies model policies through fine-tuning on structured decision-making tasks: using synthetic datasets inspired by maladaptive behavioral patterns, including depression and paranoia, we train transformer-based language models to consistently select specific classes of actions across diverse contexts. We then test whether this behavioral optimization produces systematic changes in generative distributions. Across two architectures, fine-tuned models show stable, context-general shifts in next-token probability distributions, including increased probability assigned to negative and threat-related interpretations in open-ended language tasks. These effects generalize beyond training contexts and are detectable in qualitative completions, psychometric-style evaluations, and quantitative distributional metrics such as Jensen-Shannon divergence. Induced behavioral profiles also show partial specificity. Models optimized for different behavioral patterns exhibit dissociable response tendencies across evaluation probes, suggesting that structured behavioral training produces differentiated policy-level biases rather than generic distributional skew. We interpret these findings as evidence that consistent behavioral optimization in LLMs can generate stable behavioral and distributional patterns consistent with altered latent priors, linking action selection and language generation. More broadly, the results support a view of LLMs as policy-based systems in which behavioral constraints shape emergent representational structure, highlighting their potential as controlled testbeds for studying the relationship between behavior, interpretation, and generative language in computational models of cognition.

Related papers

• Reading Cognition as Decisions Unfold in Words: A Factorized Inverse Decision Model [67.84198127797005]
  Inverse decision modeling infers latent properties of decision processes from observed behavior.<n>We propose a factorized inverse decision model (FIDM) that decomposes each individual's task-execution likelihood into an action factor and an effort factor.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-10T07:46:13Z)
• Evaluating Pragmatic Reasoning in Large Language Models: Evidence from Scalar Diversity [2.538209532048867]
  This study compares direct probability measurement and metalinguistic prompting across multiple models and experimental settings.<n>The results show that neither evaluation method consistently outperforms the other and that pragmatic behavior varies substantially across model families, prompting strategies, and task structures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-09T16:28:50Z)
• LLMs Reading the Rhythms of Daily Life: Aligned Understanding for Behavior Prediction and Generation [53.62804271492357]
  Large language models (LLMs) offer a promising direction due to their semantic richness, strong interpretability, and generative capabilities.<n>We propose Behavior Understanding Alignment (BUA), a novel framework that integrates LLMs into human behavior modeling through a structured curriculum learning process.<n>BUA employs sequence embeddings from pretrained behavior models as alignment anchors and guides the LLM through a three-stage curriculum, while a multi-round dialogue setting introduces prediction and generation capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-26T07:34:37Z)
• InjectRBP: Steering Large Language Model Reasoning Behavior via Pattern Injection [12.65760977924031]
  Reasoning can significantly enhance the performance of Large Language Models.<n>We investigate how models' reasoning behaviors shape reasoning from the perspective of behavioral patterns.<n>We propose two optimization methods that require no parameter updates: InjectCorrect and InjectRLOpt.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-12T14:44:40Z)
• D-Models and E-Models: Diversity-Stability Trade-offs in the Sampling Behavior of Large Language Models [91.21455683212224]
  In large language models (LLMs), the probability of relevance for the next piece of information is linked to the probability of relevance for the next product.<n>But whether fine-grained sampling probabilities faithfully align with task requirements remains an open question.<n>We identify two model types: D-models, whose P_token exhibits large step-to-step variability and poor alignment with P_task; and E-models, whose P_token is more stable and better aligned with P_task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-25T14:59:09Z)
• Can Interpretation Predict Behavior on Unseen Data? [11.280404893713213]
  Interpretability research often aims to predict how a model will respond to targeted interventions on specific mechanisms.<n>This paper explores the promises and challenges of interpretability as a tool for predicting out-of-distribution model behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-08T23:07:33Z)
• Internal Causal Mechanisms Robustly Predict Language Model Out-of-Distribution Behaviors [61.92704516732144]
  We show that the most robust features for correctness prediction are those that play a distinctive causal role in the model's behavior.<n>We propose two methods that leverage causal mechanisms to predict the correctness of model outputs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-17T00:31:39Z)
• Regularized Neural Ensemblers [55.15643209328513]
  In this study, we explore employing regularized neural networks as ensemble methods.<n>Motivated by the risk of learning low-diversity ensembles, we propose regularizing the ensembling model by randomly dropping base model predictions.<n>We demonstrate this approach provides lower bounds for the diversity within the ensemble, reducing overfitting and improving generalization capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-06T15:25:39Z)
• Observational Scaling Laws and the Predictability of Language Model Performance [51.2336010244645]
  We propose an observational approach that bypasses model training and instead builds scaling laws from 100 publically available models. We show that several emergent phenomena follow a smooth, sigmoidal behavior and are predictable from small models. We show how to predict the impact of post-training interventions like Chain-of-Thought and Self-Consistency as language model capabilities continue to improve.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-17T17:49:44Z)
• Competence-Based Analysis of Language Models [21.43498764977656]
  CALM (Competence-based Analysis of Language Models) is designed to investigate LLM competence in the context of specific tasks.<n>We develop a new approach for performing causal probing interventions using gradient-based adversarial attacks.<n>We carry out a case study of CALM using these interventions to analyze and compare LLM competence across a variety of lexical inference tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-01T08:53:36Z)
• Learning Disentangled Representations for Natural Language Definitions [0.0]
  We argue that recurrent syntactic and semantic regularities in textual data can be used to provide the models with both structural biases and generative factors. We leverage the semantic structures present in a representative and semantically dense category of sentence types, definitional sentences, for training a Variational Autoencoder to learn disentangled representations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-22T14:31:55Z)
• Towards Robust and Adaptive Motion Forecasting: A Causal Representation Perspective [72.55093886515824]
  We introduce a causal formalism of motion forecasting, which casts the problem as a dynamic process with three groups of latent variables. We devise a modular architecture that factorizes the representations of invariant mechanisms and style confounders to approximate a causal graph. Experiment results on synthetic and real datasets show that our three proposed components significantly improve the robustness and reusability of the learned motion representations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-29T18:59:09Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.