Cohesion-6K: An Arabic Dataset for Analyzing Social Cohesion and Conflict in Online Discourse
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.22447v1
- Date: Thu, 21 May 2026 13:16:28 GMT
- Title: Cohesion-6K: An Arabic Dataset for Analyzing Social Cohesion and Conflict in Online Discourse
- Abstract summary: This paper presents a manually and ChatGPT-assisted annotated dataset of six thousand Arabic public Facebook posts related to the Israeli Occupation of Palestine.<n>Cohesion-6K provides a transparent and reproducible resource for the study of online cohesion and polarization.
- Score: 0.6546712656847457
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: The study of online discourse has become central to understanding societal polarization. While much research has focused on detecting overt toxicity, the subtle dynamics of social cohesion, meaning the interaction between divisive and unifying narratives, remain computationally underexplored (Bail, 2021; Gonzalez-Bailon and Lelkes, 2023). This paper presents Cohesion-6K, a manually and ChatGPT-assisted annotated dataset of six thousand Arabic public Facebook posts related to the Israeli Occupation of Palestine. Each post is assigned to one of five discourse categories that represent a continuum from conflict to cohesion: Conflict, Resolution, Community Engagement, Supportive Interactions, and Shared Values. The annotation process combines expert human judgment with model-assisted pre-labeling verified by trained annotators, achieving substantial inter-annotator agreement (Cohens kappa = 0.85). Quantitative analysis reveals a consistent engagement gap, where conflict-oriented posts receive between two and four times more user interaction than resolution-oriented ones (p < 0.01). This pattern illustrates how divisive discourse tends to attract disproportionate visibility in Arabic social media spaces. Cohesion-6K provides a transparent and reproducible resource for the study of online cohesion and polarization. The dataset, annotation guidelines, and preprocessing code will be released for research use under an open license, supporting future work in computational social science, digital communication, and Arabic natural language processing.
Related papers
- Elite Proxies, Algorithmic Bottlenecks, and Multi-Platform Information Cascades in the 2026 Iran War [0.0]
This study tracks the transformation of President Trump's statements during the 2026 Iran War as they move from Truth Social into X-Twitter and Bluesky.<n>The results reveal pronounced behavioral divergence driven by socio-technical affordances.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-09T16:55:50Z) - MT-PingEval: Evaluating Multi-Turn Collaboration with Private Information Games [70.37904949359938]
We evaluate language models in multi-turn interactions using a suite of collaborative games that require effective communication about private information.<n>We find that language models are unable to use interactive collaboration to improve over the non-interactive baseline scenario.<n>We analyze the linguistic features of these dialogues, assessing the roles of sycophancy, information density, and discourse coherence.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-27T17:13:20Z) - The Rise of AI Agent Communities: Large-Scale Analysis of Discourse and Interaction on Moltbook [62.2627874717318]
Moltbook is a Reddit-like social platform where AI agents create posts and interact with other agents through comments and replies.<n>Using a public API snapshot collected about five days after launch, we address three research questions: what AI agents discuss, how they post, and how they interact.<n>We show that agents' writing is predominantly neutral, with positivity appearing in community engagement and assistance-oriented content.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-13T05:28:31Z) - Modeling Narrative Archetypes in Conspiratorial Narratives: Insights from Singapore-Based Telegram Groups [14.545582048682911]
This work analyzes conspiratorial narratives in Singapore-based Telegram groups.<n>It shows that such content is woven into everyday discussions rather than confined to isolated echo chambers.<n>Our analysis shows that conspiratorial messages appear not only in clusters focused on skepticism or distrust, but also within routine discussions of finance, law, and everyday matters.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-10T21:51:16Z) - Learning Human-Object Interaction as Groups [52.28258599873394]
GroupHOI is a framework that propagates contextual information in terms of geometric proximity and semantic similarity.<n>It exhibits leading performance on the more challenging Nonverbal Interaction Detection task.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-21T07:25:10Z) - IA aplicada al análisis del conflicto Irán-Israel: Mapeo de discursos en YouTube [0.0]
This study analyzes the digital representation of the Iran-Israel conflict that occurred in June 2025 based on 120,000 comments posted on YouTube.<n>It sought to identify discursive positions regarding the actors involved and to examine how media and algorithmic biases shape digital conversations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-24T06:51:26Z) - SCALE: Towards Collaborative Content Analysis in Social Science with Large Language Model Agents and Human Intervention [50.07342730395946]
We introduce a novel multi-agent framework that effectively.<n>imulates $underlinetextbfC$ontent $underlinetextbfA$nalysis via.<n>underlinetextbfL$arge language model (LLM) agunderlinetextbfE$nts.<n>It imitates key phases of content analysis, including text coding, collaborative discussion, and dynamic codebook evolution.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-16T00:19:07Z) - Social media polarization during conflict: Insights from an ideological stance dataset on Israel-Palestine Reddit comments [0.0]
This study analyzed 9,969 Reddit comments related to the Israel-Palestine conflict, collected between October 2023 and August 2024.<n>Various approaches, including machine learning, pre-trained language models, neural networks, and prompt engineering strategies were employed to classify these stances.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-01T12:26:11Z) - IsamasRed: A Public Dataset Tracking Reddit Discussions on Israel-Hamas Conflict [13.92311040225417]
We present a meticulously compiled dataset-IsamasRed spanning from August 2023 to November 2023.
Our initial analysis on the dataset, examining topics, controversy, emotional and moral language trends over time, highlights the emotionally charged and complex nature of the discourse.
This dataset aims to enrich the understanding of online discussions, shedding light on the complex interplay between ideology, sentiment, and community engagement in digital spaces.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-16T08:30:41Z) - Co-Located Human-Human Interaction Analysis using Nonverbal Cues: A
Survey [71.43956423427397]
We aim to identify the nonverbal cues and computational methodologies resulting in effective performance.
This survey differs from its counterparts by involving the widest spectrum of social phenomena and interaction settings.
Some major observations are: the most often used nonverbal cue, computational method, interaction environment, and sensing approach are speaking activity, support vector machines, and meetings composed of 3-4 persons equipped with microphones and cameras, respectively.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-07-20T13:37:57Z) - Dynamic Hybrid Relation Network for Cross-Domain Context-Dependent
Semantic Parsing [52.24507547010127]
Cross-domain context-dependent semantic parsing is a new focus of research.
We present a dynamic graph framework that effectively modelling contextual utterances, tokens, database schemas, and their complicated interaction as the conversation proceeds.
The proposed framework outperforms all existing models by large margins, achieving new state-of-the-art performance on two large-scale benchmarks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-01-05T18:11:29Z) - Is this Dialogue Coherent? Learning from Dialogue Acts and Entities [82.44143808977209]
We create the Switchboard Coherence (SWBD-Coh) corpus, a dataset of human-human spoken dialogues annotated with turn coherence ratings.
Our statistical analysis of the corpus indicates how turn coherence perception is affected by patterns of distribution of entities.
We find that models combining both DA and entity information yield the best performances both for response selection and turn coherence rating.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-06-17T21:02:40Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.