Implicit Regularization of Mini-Batch Training in Graph Neural Networks

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.22480v1
• Date: Thu, 21 May 2026 13:39:03 GMT
• Title: Implicit Regularization of Mini-Batch Training in Graph Neural Networks
• Abstract summary: Mini-batch training of Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) is fundamentally different from training on i.i.d. data.<n>We show that the simplest possible scheme, Random Node Sampling (RNS), matches or outperforms full-graph training on 8 of 10 datasets at a fraction of wall-clock memory.
• Score: 1.6336970769878818
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Mini-batch training of Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) is fundamentally different from training on i.i.d. data: sampling a subgraph alters the topology and introduces boundary effects, leading prior work to develop structure-aware samplers that preserve local connectivity and reduce embedding variance. Surprisingly, we demonstrate that the simplest possible scheme, Random Node Sampling (RNS), training on the induced subgraph of uniformly sampled nodes, matches or outperforms full-graph training on 8 of 10 datasets at a fraction of the wall-clock time and memory. To explain this, we apply backward error analysis to graph mini-batch Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD) and show that it implicitly minimizes the sampled loss plus a regularizer proportional to the mini-batch gradient variance, a quantity directly shaped by the sampler. Although RNS discards local structure, it produces mini-batches whose expected loss is closer to the full-graph loss, and whose per-batch gradients have lower variance, yielding a better implicit objective. Our analysis reframes the choice of graph sampler as a form of implicit regularization, and identifies RNS as a strong, theoretically grounded method for scalable GNN training.

Related papers

• SGM-PINN: Sampling Graphical Models for Faster Training of Physics-Informed Neural Networks [4.262342157729123]
  SGM-PINN is a graph-based importance sampling framework to improve the training efficacy of Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) Experiments demonstrate the advantages of the proposed framework, achieving $3times$ faster convergence compared to prior state-of-the-art sampling methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-10T04:31:50Z)
• A Local Graph Limits Perspective on Sampling-Based GNNs [7.601210044390688]
  We propose a theoretical framework for training Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) on large input graphs via training on small, fixed-size sampled subgraphs. We prove that parameters learned from training sampling-based GNNs on small samples of a large input graph are within an $epsilon$-neighborhood of the outcome of training the same architecture on the whole graph.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-17T02:58:49Z)
• Graph Out-of-Distribution Generalization with Controllable Data Augmentation [51.17476258673232]
  Graph Neural Network (GNN) has demonstrated extraordinary performance in classifying graph properties. Due to the selection bias of training and testing data, distribution deviation is widespread. We propose OOD calibration to measure the distribution deviation of virtual samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-16T13:10:27Z)
• Joint Edge-Model Sparse Learning is Provably Efficient for Graph Neural Networks [89.28881869440433]
  This paper provides the first theoretical characterization of joint edge-model sparse learning for graph neural networks (GNNs) It proves analytically that both sampling important nodes and pruning neurons with the lowest-magnitude can reduce the sample complexity and improve convergence without compromising the test accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-06T16:54:20Z)
• Training trajectories, mini-batch losses and the curious role of the learning rate [13.848916053916618]
  We show that validated gradient descent plays a fundamental role in nearly all applications of deep learning. We propose a simple model and a geometric interpretation that allows to analyze the relationship between the gradients of mini-batches and the full batch. In particular, a very low loss value can be reached just one step of descent with large enough learning rate.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-05T21:58:46Z)
• Learning Compact Features via In-Training Representation Alignment [19.273120635948363]
  In each epoch, the true gradient of the loss function is estimated using a mini-batch sampled from the training set. We propose In-Training Representation Alignment (ITRA) that explicitly aligns feature distributions of two different mini-batches with a matching loss. We also provide a rigorous analysis of the desirable effects of the matching loss on feature representation learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-23T22:23:22Z)
• Learning GFlowNets from partial episodes for improved convergence and stability [56.99229746004125]
  Generative flow networks (GFlowNets) are algorithms for training a sequential sampler of discrete objects under an unnormalized target density. Existing training objectives for GFlowNets are either local to states or transitions, or propagate a reward signal over an entire sampling trajectory. Inspired by the TD($lambda$) algorithm in reinforcement learning, we introduce subtrajectory balance or SubTB($lambda$), a GFlowNet training objective that can learn from partial action subsequences of varying lengths.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-26T15:44:24Z)
• Mean-field Analysis of Piecewise Linear Solutions for Wide ReLU Networks [83.58049517083138]
  We consider a two-layer ReLU network trained via gradient descent. We show that SGD is biased towards a simple solution. We also provide empirical evidence that knots at locations distinct from the data points might occur.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-03T15:14:20Z)
• Accelerating Training and Inference of Graph Neural Networks with Fast Sampling and Pipelining [58.10436813430554]
  Mini-batch training of graph neural networks (GNNs) requires a lot of computation and data movement. We argue in favor of performing mini-batch training with neighborhood sampling in a distributed multi-GPU environment. We present a sequence of improvements to mitigate these bottlenecks, including a performance-engineered neighborhood sampler. We also conduct an empirical analysis that supports the use of sampling for inference, showing that test accuracies are not materially compromised.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-16T02:41:35Z)
• Bandit Samplers for Training Graph Neural Networks [63.17765191700203]
  Several sampling algorithms with variance reduction have been proposed for accelerating the training of Graph Convolution Networks (GCNs) These sampling algorithms are not applicable to more general graph neural networks (GNNs) where the message aggregator contains learned weights rather than fixed weights, such as Graph Attention Networks (GAT)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-10T12:48:37Z)
• Improve SGD Training via Aligning Mini-batches [22.58823484394866]
  In-Training Distribution Matching (ITDM) is proposed to improve deep neural networks (DNNs) training and reduce overfitting. Specifically, ITDM regularizes the feature extractor by matching the moments of distributions of different mini-batches in each iteration of SGD.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-23T15:10:59Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.