Forecasting Scientific Progress with Artificial Intelligence

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.22681v1
• Date: Thu, 21 May 2026 16:23:36 GMT
• Title: Forecasting Scientific Progress with Artificial Intelligence
• Abstract summary: We evaluate scientific forecasting in AI systems through feasibility assessment, mechanistic reasoning, generative solution design, and temporal prediction.<n>Across 4,760 scientific events, we observe systematic and domain-dependent limitations in current frontier models.<n>Performance is highly heterogeneous across domains, with the timing of AI progress more predictable than advances in biology, chemistry, and physics.
• Score: 75.02347691513005
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly embedded in scientific discovery, yet whether it can anticipate scientific progress remains unclear. To study this question, we introduce a temporally grounded evaluation framework for forecasting scientific progress under controlled knowledge constraints. We present CUSP (Cutoff-conditioned Unseen Scientific Progress), a multi-disciplinary and event-level benchmark that evaluates scientific forecasting in AI systems through feasibility assessment, mechanistic reasoning, generative solution design, and temporal prediction. Across 4,760 scientific events, we observe systematic and domain-dependent limitations in current frontier models. While models can identify plausible research directions from competing candidates, they fail to reliably predict whether scientific advances will be realized and systematically misestimate when they will occur. Performance is highly heterogeneous across domains, with the timing of AI progress more predictable than advances in biology, chemistry, and physics. Performance is largely insensitive to whether events occur before or after the training cutoff, suggesting these limitations cannot be explained solely by knowledge exposure in training data. Under controlled information access, additional pre-cutoff knowledge improves performance but does not close the gap to full-information settings, which becomes more pronounced for high-citation advances. Models also exhibit systematic overconfidence and strong response biases, indicating unreliable uncertainty estimation. Taken together, current AI systems fall short as predictive tools for scientific progress. Access to prior knowledge does not translate into reliable forecasting, and performance benefits more from post-event information than from forward-looking prediction.

Related papers

• EWE: An Agentic Framework for Extreme Weather Analysis [61.092871317626496]
  Extreme Weather Expert (EWE) is first intelligent agent framework dedicated to this task.<n>EWE emulates expert visualizations through knowledge-guided planning, closed-loop reasoning, and a domain-tailored meteorological toolkit.<n>To catalyze progress, we introduce the first benchmark for this emerging field, comprising a curated dataset of 103 high-impact events.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-26T14:37:25Z)
• AI4X Roadmap: Artificial Intelligence for the advancement of scientific pursuit and its future directions [65.44445343399126]
  We look at AI-enabled science across biology, chemistry, climate science, mathematics, materials science, physics, self-driving laboratories and unconventional computing.<n>Several shared themes emerge: the need for diverse and trustworthy data, transferable electronic-structure and interatomic models, AI systems integrated into end-to-end scientific synthesis.<n>Across domains, we highlight how large foundation models, active learning and self-driving laboratories can close loops between prediction and validation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-26T02:10:28Z)
• The Need for Verification in AI-Driven Scientific Discovery [9.887965168376311]
  Machine learning and large language models can generate hypotheses at a scale and speed far exceeding traditional methods.<n>We argue that without scalable and reliable mechanisms for verification, scientific progress risks being hindered rather than being advanced.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-01T11:50:04Z)
• Probabilistic Artificial Intelligence [42.59649764999974]
  Key aspect of intelligence is to not only make predictions, but reason about the uncertainty in these predictions, and to consider this uncertainty when making decisions.<n>We discuss the differentiation between "epistemic" uncertainty due to lack of data and "aleatoric" uncertainty, which is irreducible and stems, e.g., from noisy observations and outcomes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-07T14:29:07Z)
• Revisiting the Efficacy of Signal Decomposition in AI-based Time Series Prediction [30.79648134300691]
  Time series prediction is a fundamental problem in scientific exploration. We find non-negligible evidence that challenges the effectiveness of signal decomposition in AI-based time series prediction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-11T10:59:56Z)
• Towards an end-to-end artificial intelligence driven global weather forecasting system [57.5191940978886]
  We present an AI-based data assimilation model, i.e., Adas, for global weather variables. We demonstrate that Adas can assimilate global observations to produce high-quality analysis, enabling the system operate stably for long term. We are the first to apply the methods to real-world scenarios, which is more challenging and has considerable practical application potential.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-18T09:05:28Z)
• Uncertainty Quantification of Deep Learning for Spatiotemporal Data: Challenges and Opportunities [8.23890319871992]
  Uncertainty (UQ) aims to estimate a deep learning model's confidence. This paper provides a brief overview of UQ for deep learningtemporal data, including its unique challenges and existing methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-04T19:11:25Z)
• Accelerating science with human-aware artificial intelligence [2.7786142348700658]
  We show that incorporating the distribution of human expertise by training unsupervised models dramatically improves (up to 400%) AI prediction of future discoveries. These models succeed by predicting human predictions and the scientists who will make them. Accelerating human discovery or probing its blind spots, human-aware AI enables us to move toward and beyond the contemporary scientific frontier.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-02T12:43:23Z)
• Interpretable Self-Aware Neural Networks for Robust Trajectory Prediction [50.79827516897913]
  We introduce an interpretable paradigm for trajectory prediction that distributes the uncertainty among semantic concepts. We validate our approach on real-world autonomous driving data, demonstrating superior performance over state-of-the-art baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-16T06:28:20Z)
• Heterogeneous-Agent Trajectory Forecasting Incorporating Class Uncertainty [54.88405167739227]
  We present HAICU, a method for heterogeneous-agent trajectory forecasting that explicitly incorporates agents' class probabilities. We additionally present PUP, a new challenging real-world autonomous driving dataset. We demonstrate that incorporating class probabilities in trajectory forecasting significantly improves performance in the face of uncertainty.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-26T10:28:34Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.