Query-Adaptive Semantic Chunking for Retrieval-Augmented Generation: A Dynamic Strategy with Contextual Window Expansion

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.22834v2
• Date: Tue, 26 May 2026 05:31:03 GMT
• Title: Query-Adaptive Semantic Chunking for Retrieval-Augmented Generation: A Dynamic Strategy with Contextual Window Expansion
• Abstract summary: We present Query-Adaptive Semantic Chunking (QASC), which dynamically constructs chunks by integrating queries into segmentation through three mechanisms.<n>QASC achieves an F1-score of 0.85, a relative improvement of 18-27% over fixed chunking and 8-12% over semantic and agentic alternatives.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
• Abstract: Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems depend critically on document chunking quality for retrieving relevant context. Fixed chunking segments documents into uniform units irrespective of semantics or user intent, producing a precision-recall trade-off unresolvable by tuning chunk size alone. Semantic and agentic methods partially address these limitations but do not integrate user queries at the chunking stage. We present Query-Adaptive Semantic Chunking (QASC), which dynamically constructs chunks by integrating queries into segmentation through three mechanisms: cosine similarity scoring between sentence and query embeddings to identify seed sentences, contextual window expansion around seeds to preserve coherence, and chunk-level score aggregation to ensure holistic relevance. We evaluate QASC on 100 technical documents across 200 queries spanning four types, comparing against fixed chunking at five granularities, recursive splitting, semantic chunking, and agentic chunking. QASC achieves an F1-score of 0.85, a relative improvement of 18-27% over fixed chunking and 8-12% over semantic and agentic alternatives. Ablation studies confirm each component contributes meaningfully. Human evaluation by three annotators (Cohen kappa = 0.82) corroborates that QASC produces more relevant and coherent chunks than existing methods.

Related papers

• Semantic Entanglement in Vector-Based Retrieval: A Formal Framework and Context-Conditioned Disentanglement Pipeline for Agentic RAG Systems [0.0]
  We formalize semantic entanglement as a model-relative measure of cross-topic overlap in embedding space.<n>We introduce the Semantic Disentanglement Pipeline (SDP), a four-stage preprocessing framework that restructures documents prior to embedding.<n>We evaluate SDP on a real-world enterprise healthcare knowledge base comprising over 2,000 documents across approximately 25 sub-domains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-20T00:24:34Z)
• CHOP: Chunkwise Context-Preserving Framework for RAG on Multi Documents [6.134883925217888]
  We propose CHOP, a framework that iteratively evaluates chunk relevance with Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>CHOP integrates two key components: the CNM-Extractor, which generates compact per-chunk signatures capturing categories, key nouns, and model names, and the Continuity Decision Module, which preserves contextual coherence.<n> Experiments on benchmark datasets show that CHOP alleviates retrieval confusion and provides a scalable approach for building high-quality knowledge bases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-17T08:05:17Z)
• Adaptive Chunking: Optimizing Chunking-Method Selection for RAG [0.0]
  We introduce Adaptive Chunking, a framework that selects the most suitable chunking strategy for each document.<n>On a diverse corpus spanning legal, technical, and social science domains, our metric-merge adaptive method significantly improves downstream RAG performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-26T11:20:52Z)
• Multi-Vector Index Compression in Any Modality [73.7330345057813]
  Late interaction has emerged as a dominant paradigm for information retrieval in text, images, visual documents, and videos.<n>We introduce four approaches for index compression: sequence resizing, memory tokens, hierarchical pooling, and a novel attention-guided clustering (AGC)<n>AGC uses an attention-guided mechanism to identify the most semantically salient regions of a document as cluster centroids and to weight token aggregation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-24T18:57:33Z)
• Cross-Document Topic-Aligned Chunking for Retrieval-Augmented Generation [0.0]
  Cross-Document Topic-Aligned chunking reconstructs knowledge at the corpus level.<n>It first identifies topics across documents, maps segments to each topic, and synthesizes them into unified chunks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-08T11:45:45Z)
• Towards Global Retrieval Augmented Generation: A Benchmark for Corpus-Level Reasoning [50.27838512822097]
  We introduce GlobalQA, the first benchmark specifically designed to evaluate global RAG capabilities.<n>We propose GlobalRAG, a multi-tool collaborative framework that preserves structural coherence through chunk-level retrieval.<n>On the Qwen2.5-14B model, GlobalRAG achieves 6.63 F1 compared to the strongest baseline's 1.51 F1.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-30T07:29:14Z)
• CORG: Generating Answers from Complex, Interrelated Contexts [57.213304718157985]
  In a real-world corpus, knowledge frequently recurs across documents but often contains inconsistencies due to ambiguous naming, outdated information, or errors.<n>Previous research has shown that language models struggle with these complexities, typically focusing on single factors in isolation.<n>We introduce Context Organizer (CORG), a framework that organizes multiple contexts into independently processed groups.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-25T02:40:48Z)
• vCache: Verified Semantic Prompt Caching [95.16654660556975]
  This paper proposes vCache, the first verified semantic cache with user-defined error rate guarantees.<n>It employs an online learning algorithm to estimate an optimal threshold for each cached prompt, enabling reliable cache responses without additional training.<n>Our experiments show that vCache consistently meets the specified error bounds while outperforming state-of-the-art static-threshold and fine-tuned embedding baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-06T04:16:20Z)
• Is Semantic Chunking Worth the Computational Cost? [0.0]
  This study systematically evaluates the effectiveness of semantic chunking using three common retrieval-related tasks. The results show that the computational costs associated with semantic chunking are not justified by consistent performance gains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-16T21:53:48Z)
• Localizing Factual Inconsistencies in Attributable Text Generation [74.11403803488643]
  We introduce QASemConsistency, a new formalism for localizing factual inconsistencies in attributable text generation.<n>We show that QASemConsistency yields factual consistency scores that correlate well with human judgments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-09T22:53:48Z)
• Adaptive Retrieval and Scalable Indexing for k-NN Search with Cross-Encoders [77.84801537608651]
  Cross-encoder (CE) models which compute similarity by jointly encoding a query-item pair perform better than embedding-based models (dual-encoders) at estimating query-item relevance. We propose a sparse-matrix factorization based method that efficiently computes latent query and item embeddings to approximate CE scores and performs k-NN search with the approximate CE similarity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-06T17:14:34Z)
• Query Expansion Using Contextual Clue Sampling with Language Models [69.51976926838232]
  We propose a combination of an effective filtering strategy and fusion of the retrieved documents based on the generation probability of each context. Our lexical matching based approach achieves a similar top-5/top-20 retrieval accuracy and higher top-100 accuracy compared with the well-established dense retrieval model DPR. For end-to-end QA, the reader model also benefits from our method and achieves the highest Exact-Match score against several competitive baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-13T15:18:04Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.