A Proactive Multi-Agent Dialogue Framework for Assessing Social Language Disorder Traits in Autism

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.22993v1
• Date: Thu, 21 May 2026 19:45:46 GMT
• Title: A Proactive Multi-Agent Dialogue Framework for Assessing Social Language Disorder Traits in Autism
• Abstract summary: We present TPA (Think, Plan, Ask), a proactive multi-agent dialogue framework applied to the language assessment component of the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule Module 4 (ADOS-2)<n>A doctor agent explicitly reasons about which traits remain unobserved before selecting a clinically grounded strategy and generating a targeted question.<n>A patient agent grounded in real ADOS-2 clinical data enables reproducible evaluation without real patient participation, validated across three independent experiments confirming adequate fidelity to real patient language.
• Score: 11.474807247446526
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Characteristic linguistic behaviors associated with Social Language Disorder (SLD) in autism spectrum disorder, including echoic repetition, pronoun displacement, and stereotyped media quoting, are largely absent from spontaneous conversation and only emerge under specific conversational conditions. In structured clinical assessments, this latency means that questioning strategy selection is a critical yet underappreciated determinant of how much diagnostic information a conversation yields. Whether large language models (LLMs) can be guided to proactively select questioning strategies that systematically surface these latent traits remains largely unexplored. Here we present TPA (Think, Plan, Ask), a proactive multi-agent dialogue framework applied to the language assessment component of the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule Module 4 (ADOS-2), in which a doctor agent explicitly reasons about which traits remain unobserved before selecting a clinically grounded strategy and generating a targeted question. A patient agent grounded in real ADOS-2 clinical data enables reproducible evaluation without real patient participation, validated across three independent experiments confirming adequate fidelity to real patient language. Evaluated on 484 episodes from 35 patients, TPA outperforms six competitive dialogue planning baselines across all primary metrics, achieving 82.1% SLD trait coverage, 16.6% higher than automated replay of real clinical dialogues conducted by trained clinicians (65.5%), with substantially greater per-turn diagnostic efficiency (AUCC: 0.628 vs. 0.458, absolute gain +0.170). These results demonstrate that proactive questioning strategy selection substantially improves the efficiency of automated SLD trait assessment, with direct implications for scalable AI-assisted clinical screening.

Related papers

• ResidencyRL: Reinforcement Learning in Simulated Clinical Environments [53.76751756107077]
  We present ResidencyRL, a reinforcement learning (RL) method for training clinical artificial intelligence (AI) agents through simulated multi-turn clinical encounters.<n>On heldout evaluations, the ResidencyRL agent improves diagnostic accuracy by 7.0% under adversarial conditions.<n>Blinded expert clinicians validated these gains, preferring the trained agent in 87.6% of side-by-side comparisons.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-07T17:04:41Z)
• AIPatient Arena: EHR-grounded evaluation of large language models in end-to-end clinical consultation workflows [7.354281305130301]
  Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly considered for use in clinical consultation tasks.<n>We propose AIPatient Arena, an EHRs-grounded evaluation framework for assessing the clinical utility of LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-16T03:35:17Z)
• Detecting Stealth Sycophancy in Mental-Health Dialogue with Dynamic Emotional Signature Graphs [4.002154823241671]
  We study multi-domain support-dialogue evaluation without relying on large language models as final judges.<n>We find that direct LLM judges and symmetric text-similarity metrics are poorly aligned with therapeutic quality.<n>To address this issue, we propose Dynamic Emotional Signature Graphs (DESG)<n>DESG represents dialogue windows with decoupled clinical states and scores them using asymmetric clinical geometry.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-05T07:56:20Z)
• Cerebra: A Multidisciplinary AI Board for Multimodal Dementia Characterization and Risk Assessment [56.62016795093786]
  Cerebra is an interactive multi-agent AI team that coordinates specialized agents for EHR, clinical notes, and medical imaging analysis.<n>It supports privacy-preserving deployment by operating on structured representations and remains robust when modalities are incomplete.<n>Cerebra significantly improved expert performance, increasing accuracy by 17.5 percentage points in prospective dementia risk estimation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-23T05:46:45Z)
• Agentic Cognitive Profiling: Realigning Automated Alzheimer's Disease Detection with Clinical Construct Validity [66.94391219005291]
  This paper proposes Agentic Cognitive Profiling (ACP), an agentic framework that realigns automated screening with clinical protocol logic.<n>Central to our design is decoupling semantic understanding from measurement by delegating all quantification to deterministic function calling.<n>ACP achieves 90.5% score match rate in task examination and 85.3% accuracy in AD prediction, surpassing popular baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-18T06:15:35Z)
• Clinician input steers frontier AI models toward both accurate and harmful decisions [10.599240857217811]
  We evaluated 21 large language models (LLMs) across 8 frontier models on differential diagnosis generation and next step recommendations.<n>Expert context significantly improved correct final diagnosis inclusion across all 21 models.<n>In GPT-4o experiments, explicit clinician uncertainty signals improved diagnostic performance after adversarial context.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-14T23:47:53Z)
• ClinDEF: A Dynamic Evaluation Framework for Large Language Models in Clinical Reasoning [58.01333341218153]
  We propose ClinDEF, a dynamic framework for assessing clinical reasoning in LLMs through simulated diagnostic dialogues.<n>Our method generates patient cases and facilitates multi-turn interactions between an LLM-based doctor and an automated patient agent.<n>Experiments show that ClinDEF effectively exposes critical clinical reasoning gaps in state-of-the-art LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-29T12:58:58Z)
• Evolving Diagnostic Agents in a Virtual Clinical Environment [75.59389103511559]
  We present a framework for training large language models (LLMs) as diagnostic agents with reinforcement learning.<n>Our method acquires diagnostic strategies through interactive exploration and outcome-based feedback.<n>DiagAgent significantly outperforms 10 state-of-the-art LLMs, including DeepSeek-v3 and GPT-4o.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-28T17:19:47Z)
• DocCHA: Towards LLM-Augmented Interactive Online diagnosis System [17.975659876934895]
  DocCHA is a confidence-aware, modular framework that emulates clinical reasoning by decomposing the diagnostic process into three stages.<n> evaluated on two real-world Chinese consultation datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-10T15:52:04Z)
• Evaluating Spoken Language as a Biomarker for Automated Screening of Cognitive Impairment [37.40606157690235]
  Alterations in speech and language can be early predictors of Alzheimer's disease and related dementias.<n>We evaluated machine learning techniques for ADRD screening and severity prediction from spoken language.<n>Risk stratification and linguistic feature importance analysis enhanced the interpretability and clinical utility of predictions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-30T20:17:17Z)
• Enhancing Diagnostic Accuracy through Multi-Agent Conversations: Using Large Language Models to Mitigate Cognitive Bias [5.421033429862095]
  Cognitive biases in clinical decision-making significantly contribute to errors in diagnosis and suboptimal patient outcomes. This study explores the role of large language models in mitigating these biases through the utilization of a multi-agent framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-26T01:35:50Z)
• Exploring linguistic feature and model combination for speech recognition based automatic AD detection [61.91708957996086]
  Speech based automatic AD screening systems provide a non-intrusive and more scalable alternative to other clinical screening techniques. Scarcity of specialist data leads to uncertainty in both model selection and feature learning when developing such systems. This paper investigates the use of feature and model combination approaches to improve the robustness of domain fine-tuning of BERT and Roberta pre-trained text encoders.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-28T05:09:01Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.