Redrawing the AI Map: A Theory of Accountability Boundaries in Agentic Ecosystems

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.23179v1
• Date: Fri, 22 May 2026 02:57:55 GMT
• Title: Redrawing the AI Map: A Theory of Accountability Boundaries in Agentic Ecosystems
• Abstract summary: We develop a capability-level theory of accountability-boundary placement in agentic ecosystems.<n>We argue that verification cost and responsibility transferability determine whether the execution and accountability boundaries can move together.<n>The theory explains when digital modularization extends to organizational disaggregation and when accountability keeps capabilities integrated.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Agentic AI orchestrators reduce the interface and assembly costs of composing information systems capabilities across organizational boundaries, seemingly accelerating modularization and organizational disaggregation. Yet AI-enabled capabilities whose outputs require evidence, review, signoff, or assignable responsibility may retain integrated accountability boundaries even when their technical interfaces become modular. We develop a capability-level theory of accountability-boundary placement in agentic ecosystems. We introduce accountability assets: complementary assets that make AI-supported outputs legitimate, auditable, reviewable, and assignable to a responsible party. We argue that verification cost and responsibility transferability determine whether the execution and accountability boundaries can move together. The theory identifies three boundary strategies: component, integrated, and dual-track. It also introduces rule debt, the governance burden that accrues when organizational decision rules migrate from formal information systems into ungoverned agentic execution environments. Integrating digital innovation, transaction cost, complementary-assets, digital platform governance, and IS control perspectives, we develop seven propositions linking agentic assembly-cost reductions, accountability assets, appropriability, orchestrator intent capture, and boundary misconfiguration to boundary strategy, value appropriation, and rule debt. The theory explains when digital modularization extends to organizational disaggregation and when accountability keeps capabilities integrated. Structured illustrations across document processing, legal services, audit, clinical decision support, and procurement discipline the boundary logic.

Related papers

• Neuro-Symbolic Agents for Regulated Process Automation: Challenges and Research Agenda [43.328395470827665]
  We argue that symbolic structures embedded in regulated industries should be treated as core architectural components.<n>We propose compliance-by-construction as a complementary paradigm to guardrail-based monitoring.<n>We call on the neuro-symbolic community to engage with regulated process automation as a high impact research domain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-11T14:34:11Z)
• Foundation Protocol: A Coordination Layer for Agentic Society [78.01727114524464]
  Foundation Protocol (FP) is a graph-first coordination layer for an emerging human-AI society.<n>FP unifies heterogeneous entities, including agents, tools, resources, humans, institutions, and organizations.<n>The aim is to keep autonomous agency composable while keeping accountability non-negotiable.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-22T04:20:35Z)
• Going Headless? On the Boundaries of Vertical AI Firms [0.0]
  General-purpose AI agents are now unbundling that package, prompting founders and investors to advocate "going headless"<n>This article argues that going headless is correct for some firms and destructive for others.<n>It proposes a three-position taxonomy determined not by sector but by task-accountability regime.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-18T03:38:29Z)
• How Supply Chain Dependencies Complicate Bias Measurement and Accountability Attribution in AI Hiring Applications [1.0742675209112622]
  Modern AI hiring systems operate within complex supply chains where responsibility fragments across data vendors, model developers, platform providers, and deploying organizations.<n>This paper investigates how these dependency chains complicate bias evaluation and accountability attribution.<n>We propose multi-layered interventions including system-level audits, vendor guidelines, continuous monitoring mechanisms, and documentation across dependency chains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-24T16:01:35Z)
• From Skills to Talent: Organising Heterogeneous Agents as a Real-World Company [37.358554029394604]
  We introduce emphOneManCompany (OMC), a framework that elevates multi-agent systems to the organisational level.<n>OMC encapsulates skills, tools, and runtime configurations into portable agent identities called emphTalents<n>A community-driven emphTalent Market enables on-demand recruitment, allowing the organisation to close capability gaps.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-24T11:02:44Z)
• Governed Auditable Decisioning Under Uncertainty: Synthesis and Agentic Extension [0.0]
  When automated decision systems fail, organizations often discover that formally compliant governance infrastructure cannot reconstruct what happened or why.<n>This paper synthesizes an operational governance evidence framework into an integrated chain and analytically assesses its transferability across four decision system architectures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-21T05:45:04Z)
• COMPASS: The explainable agentic framework for Sovereignty, Sustainability, Compliance, and Ethics [0.0]
  This paper introduces a novel multi-agent orchestration system designed to enforce value-aligned AI.<n>The framework comprises an Orchestrator and four specialised sub-agents addressing sovereignty, carbon-aware computing, compliance, and ethics.<n>By employing an LLM-as-a-judge methodology, the system assigns quantitative scores and generates explainable justifications for each assessment dimension.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-11T20:14:35Z)
• A Survey of Reasoning in Autonomous Driving Systems: Open Challenges and Emerging Paradigms [49.66022971508878]
  We argue that reasoning should be elevated from a modular component to the system's cognitive core.<n>We derive and systematize seven core reasoning challenges, such as the responsiveness-reasoning trade-off and social-game reasoning.<n>We identify a fundamental and unresolved tension between the high-latency, deliberative nature of LLM-based reasoning and the millisecond-scale, safety-critical demands of vehicle control.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-11T07:40:53Z)
• Governing AI Forgetting: Auditing for Machine Unlearning Compliance [30.173215964349044]
  We introduce the first economic framework for auditing machine unlearning compliance, by integrating certified unlearning theory with regulatory enforcement.<n>We first characterize MU's inherent verification uncertainty using a hypothesis-testing interpretation of certified unlearning.<n>We then propose a game-theoretic model to capture the strategic interactions between the auditor and the operator.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-16T08:32:09Z)
• A Technical Policy Blueprint for Trustworthy Decentralized AI [29.298499284846844]
  We propose a Technical Policy Blueprint that encodes governance requirements as policy-as-code objects.<n>We are proposing a Technical Policy Blueprint that separates asset policy verification from asset policy enforcement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-07T21:27:48Z)
• The Loss of Control Playbook: Degrees, Dynamics, and Preparedness [39.39076397908963]
  This report addresses the absence of an actionable definition for Loss of Control (LoC) in AI systems by developing a novel taxonomy and preparedness framework.<n>We propose a graded LoC taxonomy, based on the metrics of severity and persistence, that distinguishes between Deviation, Bounded LoC, and Strict LoC.<n>We put forward a plan to maintain preparedness and prevent the occurrence of LoC outcomes should a state of societal vulnerability be reached.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-19T20:10:39Z)
• A Vision for Access Control in LLM-based Agent Systems [23.59407514665941]
  This paper argues for a paradigm shift from binary access control to a more sophisticated model of information governance.<n>We introduce Agent Access Control (AAC), a novel framework that reframes AC as a dynamic, context-aware process of information flow governance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-13T07:57:09Z)
• Agentic AI for Financial Crime Compliance [0.0]
  This paper presents the design and deployment of an agentic AI system for financial crime compliance (FCC) in digitally native financial platforms.<n>The contribution includes a reference architecture, a real-world prototype, and insights into how Agentic AI can reconfigure under regulatory constraints.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-16T14:53:51Z)
• Enabling Regulatory Multi-Agent Collaboration: Architecture, Challenges, and Solutions [30.046299694187855]
  Large language models (LLMs)-empowered autonomous agents are transforming both digital and physical environments by enabling adaptive, multi-agent collaboration.<n>We propose a blockchain-enabled layered architecture for regulatory agent collaboration, comprising an agent layer, a blockchain data layer, and a regulatory application layer.<n>Our approach establishes a systematic foundation for trustworthy, resilient, and scalable regulatory mechanisms in large-scale agent ecosystems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-11T07:46:00Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.