Security, Privacy, and Ethical Risks in OpenClaw

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.23330v1
• Date: Fri, 22 May 2026 07:45:04 GMT
• Title: Security, Privacy, and Ethical Risks in OpenClaw
• Abstract summary: OpenClaw is a locally executable AI agent system for natural language interaction and real-world task completion.<n>This paper systematically investigates the security, privacy, and ethical risks, as well as the traceability challenges of OpenClaw.
• Score: 7.437557907056796
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: This paper systematically investigates the security, privacy, and ethical risks, as well as the traceability challenges of OpenClaw, a locally executable AI agent system for natural language interaction and real-world task completion. While OpenClaw shows strong potential for personal assistance, office automation, cross-platform task management, and information integration, it also raises serious security, privacy, and ethical concerns. By analyzing its system architecture, core functionalities, deployment model, and representative application scenarios, this paper aims to reveal the risks that may arise when such a highly privileged agent is integrated into personal and organizational digital environments. We focus in particular on the challenges associated with persistent local storage, tool invocation, cross-context information aggregation, multi-user interaction, and the integration of plugins and external services. We argue that these issues constitute major barriers to the trustworthy deployment and widespread adoption of this technology. Finally, we summarize the open challenges in security defenses, privacy protection, ethical governance, and traceability in agent use, and call for joint efforts from researchers, developers, deployers, and regulators to build AI agent systems that are safer, more reliable, and more trustworthy.

Related papers

• Security of OpenClaw Agents: Fundamentals, Attacks, and Countermeasures [36.008815600759156]
  OpenClaw is a new class of open-source agent frameworks that operate as continuously running, skill-augmented systems with persistent memory, multi-channel interaction, and high degrees of autonomy.<n>In particular, the combination of high-privilege operations and persistent memory exposes OpenClaw agents to various emerging threats, including skill poisoning, cognitive manipulation, multi-agent cascading failures, and supply-chain vulnerabilities.<n>We categorize existing security and privacy threats into a layered framework and analyze how vulnerabilities arise during agent reasoning, action execution, and external interaction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-25T05:25:39Z)
• Towards trustworthy agentic AI: a comprehensive survey of safety, robustness, privacy, and system security [57.35851886874902]
  Agentic AI systems execute complex tasks autonomously, but their multi-step trajectories introduce new failure modes that challenge trustworthiness.<n>This survey provides a focused examination of trustworthy agentic AI through two core dimensions that are critical for high-risk deployments.<n>For each dimension, we clarify key concepts, identify where risks emerge along the agent workflow, and summarize stage-targeted mitigation strategies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-17T10:26:37Z)
• Toward Securing AI Agents Like Operating Systems [13.41373985756433]
  Autonomous agents based on large language models (LLMs) are rapidly emerging as a general-purpose technology.<n>We investigate the security of LLM-based agents through the lens of operating systems.<n>We conclude with a set of recommendations for the secure design of agentic systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-14T15:07:25Z)
• Safety in Embodied AI: A Survey of Risks, Attacks, and Defenses [168.50301366360344]
  Embodied Artificial Intelligence (Embodied AI) integrates perception, cognition, planning, and interaction into agents that operate in safety-critical environments.<n>Unlike digital AI systems, embodied agents must act under uncertain sensing, incomplete knowledge, and dynamic human-robot interactions.<n>This survey provides a comprehensive review of safety research in embodied AI, examining attacks and defenses across the full embodied pipeline.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-28T13:21:44Z)
• Human Society-Inspired Approaches to Agentic AI Security: The 4C Framework [19.576189199576053]
  This article introduces the 4C Framework for multi-agent AI security, inspired by societal governance.<n>By shifting AI security from a narrow focus on system-centric protection to the broader preservation of behavioral integrity and intent, the framework complements existing AI security strategies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-02T10:45:16Z)
• Securing Generative AI Agentic Workflows: Risks, Mitigation, and a Proposed Firewall Architecture [0.0]
  Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) presents significant advancements but also introduces novel security challenges.<n>This paper outlines critical security vulnerabilities inherent in GenAI agentic, including data privacy, model manipulation, and issues related to agent autonomy and system integration.<n>It details a proposed "GenAI Security Firewall" architecture designed to provide comprehensive, adaptable, and efficient protection for these systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-10T07:36:54Z)
• LLM Agents Should Employ Security Principles [60.03651084139836]
  This paper argues that the well-established design principles in information security should be employed when deploying Large Language Model (LLM) agents at scale.<n>We introduce AgentSandbox, a conceptual framework embedding these security principles to provide safeguards throughout an agent's life-cycle.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-29T21:39:08Z)
• SafeAgent: Safeguarding LLM Agents via an Automated Risk Simulator [77.86600052899156]
  Large Language Model (LLM)-based agents are increasingly deployed in real-world applications.<n>We propose AutoSafe, the first framework that systematically enhances agent safety through fully automated synthetic data generation.<n>We show that AutoSafe boosts safety scores by 45% on average and achieves a 28.91% improvement on real-world tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-23T10:56:06Z)
• Open Challenges in Multi-Agent Security: Towards Secure Systems of Interacting AI Agents [0.0]
  Decentralized AI agents will soon interact across internet platforms, creating security challenges beyond traditional cybersecurity and AI safety frameworks.<n>We introduce textbfmulti-agent security, a new field dedicated to securing networks of decentralized AI agents against threats that emerge or amplify through their interactions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-04T12:03:29Z)
• Towards Trustworthy GUI Agents: A Survey [64.6445117343499]
  This survey examines the trustworthiness of GUI agents in five critical dimensions.<n>We identify major challenges such as vulnerability to adversarial attacks, cascading failure modes in sequential decision-making.<n>As GUI agents become more widespread, establishing robust safety standards and responsible development practices is essential.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-30T13:26:00Z)
• Enhancing Enterprise Security with Zero Trust Architecture [0.0]
  Zero Trust Architecture (ZTA) represents a transformative approach to modern cybersecurity. ZTA shifts the security paradigm by assuming that no user, device, or system can be trusted by default. This paper explores the key components of ZTA, such as identity and access management (IAM), micro-segmentation, continuous monitoring, and behavioral analytics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-23T21:53:16Z)
• HAICOSYSTEM: An Ecosystem for Sandboxing Safety Risks in Human-AI Interactions [95.49509269498367]
  We present HAICOSYSTEM, a framework examining AI agent safety within diverse and complex social interactions.<n>We run 1840 simulations based on 92 scenarios across seven domains (e.g., healthcare, finance, education)<n>Our experiments show that state-of-the-art LLMs, both proprietary and open-sourced, exhibit safety risks in over 50% cases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-24T19:47:21Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.