OpenSkillEval: Automatically Auditing the Open Skill Ecosystem for LLM Agents
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.23657v2
- Date: Thu, 28 May 2026 04:39:19 GMT
- Title: OpenSkillEval: Automatically Auditing the Open Skill Ecosystem for LLM Agents
- Abstract summary: We present textscOpenSkillEval, an automatic evaluation framework for both skill-augmented agent systems and the skills themselves.<n>Instead of relying on static benchmarks, textscOpenSkillEval automatically constructs realistic task instances from evolving real-world artifacts.<n>Using more than 600 dynamically generated task instances and 30 open-source skills, we conduct a systematic evaluation of state-of-the-art models and agent frameworks.
- Score: 15.598856888948093
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Skills, i.e., structured workflow instructions distilled for large language models (LLMs), are becoming an increasingly important mechanism for improving agent performance on real-world downstream tasks. However, as the open-source skill ecosystem rapidly expands, it remains unclear how different models and agent frameworks interact with skills, how to evaluate skill quality, and how users should select skills under practical cost-performance trade-offs. In this paper, we present \textsc{OpenSkillEval}, an automatic evaluation framework for both skill-augmented agent systems and the skills themselves. Instead of relying on static benchmarks, \textsc{OpenSkillEval} automatically constructs realistic task instances from evolving real-world artifacts across five categories of downstream applications: presentation generation, front-end web design, poster generation, data visualization, and report generation. It further collects and organizes community-contributed skills for controlled comparison under unified task settings. Using more than 600 dynamically generated task instances and 30 open-source skills, we conduct a systematic evaluation of state-of-the-art models and agent frameworks. Our results show that skill availability does not guarantee effective skill usage, that the benefit of skill augmentation depends strongly on both the underlying model and the agent framework, and that many publicly popular skills do not consistently outperform base agents without skills. These findings highlight the need for dynamic, task-grounded evaluation and provide practical insights into the design, selection, and deployment of skills for LLM agents. Additional cases and benchmark resources are available on the project website: https://yingjiahao14.github.io/OpenSkillEval-Web/.
Related papers
- A Framework for Evaluating Agentic Skills at Scale [0.4509560087514856]
Agent skills are structured, reusable knowledge artifacts that augment agent capabilities.<n>No reusable methodology exists for evaluating an individual skill.<n>We present an evaluation framework that lets a skill author construct realistic tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-16T11:46:56Z) - OpenSkill: Open-World Self-Evolution for LLM Agents [57.88680042818572]
We study open-world self-evolution, where an agent must build both its skills and its own verification signals from scratch.<n>We propose OpenSkill, a framework that bootstraps this loop.<n>OpenSkill attains the best automated pass rate while satisfying the no-supervision constraint.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-04T21:55:48Z) - SkillComposer: Learning to Evolve Agent Skills for Specification and Generalization [99.18305770138677]
Agent skills are reusable strategies that guide agent reasoning and action.<n>Current skill construction methods treat the problem as one-shot extraction.<n>We introduce SkillComposer, a framework that decomposes skill construction into three learnable operations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-04T12:16:08Z) - From Context to Skills: Can Language Models Learn from Context Skillfully? [56.5857437218136]
Ctx2Skill is a self-evolving framework that autonomously discovers, refines, and selects context-specific skills.<n>It can be plugged into any language model to obtain better context learning capability.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-30T09:53:15Z) - Skill Retrieval Augmentation for Agentic AI [28.71123853744993]
In existing agent systems, the dominant strategy for incorporating skills is to enumerate available skills within the context window.<n>This paper formulates Skill Retrieval Augmentation (SRA), a new paradigm in which agents dynamically retrieve, incorporate, and apply relevant skills from large external skill corpora on demand.<n>SRA-Bench is the first benchmark for evaluation of the full SRA pipeline, covering skill retrieval, skill incorporation, and end-task execution.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-27T15:19:59Z) - SkillX: Automatically Constructing Skill Knowledge Bases for Agents [27.56549031749266]
SkillX is a fully automated framework for constructing a plug-and-play skill knowledge base.<n>It operates through a fully automated pipeline built on three synergistic innovations.<n> Experiments show that SkillKB consistently improves task success and execution efficiency when plugged into weaker base agents.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-06T16:09:33Z) - SKILL0: In-Context Agentic Reinforcement Learning for Skill Internalization [61.37478254738943]
Inference-time skill augmentation is fundamentally limited.<n>We introduce SKILL0, an in-context reinforcement learning framework designed for skill internalization.<n>SKILL0 achieves substantial improvements over the standard RL baseline.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-02T17:03:05Z) - EvoSkills: Self-Evolving Agent Skills via Co-Evolutionary Verification [85.3692584167951]
Anthropic proposes the concept of skills for LLM agents to tackle multi-step professional tasks.<n>A tool is a single, self-contained function, whereas a skill is a structured bundle of interdependent multi-file artifacts.<n>EvoSkills is a self-evolving skills framework that enables agents to autonomously construct complex, multi-file skill packages.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-02T06:43:20Z) - SkillCraft: Can LLM Agents Learn to Use Tools Skillfully? [67.69996753743129]
We introduce SkillCraft, a benchmark explicitly stress-test agent ability to form and reuse higher-level tool compositions.<n> SkillCraft features realistic, highly compositional tool-use scenarios with difficulty scaled along both quantitative and structural dimensions.<n>We propose a lightweight evaluation protocol that enables agents to auto-compose atomic tools into executable Skills, cache and reuse them inside and across tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-28T15:44:31Z) - SkillNet: Create, Evaluate, and Connect AI Skills [159.47504178122156]
SkillNet is an open infrastructure designed to create, evaluate, and organize AI skills at scale.<n>Our infrastructure integrates a repository of over 200,000 skills, an interactive platform, and a versatile Python toolkit.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-26T14:24:02Z) - SoK: Agentic Skills -- Beyond Tool Use in LLM Agents [6.356997609995175]
Agentic systems increasingly rely on reusable procedural capabilities, textita.k.a., agentic skills, to execute long-horizon reliably.<n>This paper maps the skill layer across the full lifecycle (discovery, practice, distillation, storage, composition, evaluation, and update)<n>We analyze the security and governance implications of skill-based agents, covering supply-chain risks, prompt injection via skill payloads, and trust-tiered execution.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-24T13:11:38Z) - Agent Skills for Large Language Models: Architecture, Acquisition, Security, and the Path Forward [5.124116559484265]
The transition from monolithic language models to modular, skill-equipped agents marks a defining shift in how large language models (LLMs) are deployed in practice.<n>Rather than encoding all procedural knowledge within model weights, agent skills enable dynamic capability extension without retraining.<n>This survey provides a comprehensive treatment of the agent skills landscape, as it has rapidly evolved during the last few months.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-12T21:33:25Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.