Balancing Fairness, Privacy, and Accuracy: A Multitask Adversarial Framework for Centralized Data-Driven Systems

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.24458v1
• Date: Sat, 23 May 2026 08:10:53 GMT
• Title: Balancing Fairness, Privacy, and Accuracy: A Multitask Adversarial Framework for Centralized Data-Driven Systems
• Abstract summary: Current methods rarely address privacy, fairness, and accuracy together, which can potentially compromise ethical standards and privacy regulations.<n>This paper introduces a novel multitask adversarial model that treats fairness and privacy as integral objectives rather than afterthoughts.<n>Our approach dynamically balances fairness with accuracy and privacy through an optimized cost function with minimal performance loss.
• Score: 3.778113918314306
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The integration of fairness and privacy in centralized data-driven applications is critical, especially as these systems increasingly influence sectors with significant societal impact. Current methods rarely address privacy, fairness, and accuracy together, which can potentially compromise ethical standards and privacy regulations. However, balancing these three objectives is quite challenging since each of objective often imposes conflicting requirements on the design and training of models, making it difficult to optimize one without compromising the others. This paper introduces a novel multitask adversarial model that treats fairness and privacy as integral objectives rather than afterthoughts, and learns a latent representation that hides sensitive attributes while preserving essential task-related information. Our approach dynamically balances fairness with accuracy and privacy through an optimized cost function with minimal performance loss even under strict conditions. Extensive testing on diverse datasets shows the ability of our model to achieve high standards of fairness and privacy without significant sacrifice to accuracy. Benchmarking against state-of-the-art privacy and fairness standards shows that our method enhances the robustness of privacy, fairness, and accuracy optimization, proving its adaptability across various datasets.

Related papers

• Towards Benchmarking Privacy Vulnerabilities in Selective Forgetting with Large Language Models [28.389198065125314]
  selective forgetting (also known as machine unlearning) has shown promise for privacy and data removal tasks.<n>Despite its promise, selective forgetting raises significant privacy concerns.<n>We present the first comprehensive benchmark for evaluating privacy vulnerabilities in selective forgetting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-19T20:04:06Z)
• Fairness Meets Privacy: Integrating Differential Privacy and Demographic Parity in Multi-class Classification [6.28122931748758]
  We show that differential privacy can be integrated into a fairness-enhancing pipeline with minimal impact on fairness guarantees.<n>We design a postprocessing algorithm, called DP2DP, that enforces both demographic parity and differential privacy.<n>Our analysis reveals that our algorithm converges towards its demographic parity objective at essentially the same rate as the best non-private methods from the literature.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-24T08:31:02Z)
• Accurate Target Privacy Preserving Federated Learning Balancing Fairness and Utility [28.676852732262407]
  Federated Learning (FL) enables collaborative model training without data sharing.<n>We introduce a differentially private fair FL algorithm that transforms this multi-objective optimization into a zero-sum game.<n>Our theoretical analysis reveals a surprising inverse relationship, i.e., stricter privacy protection limits the system's ability to detect and correct demographic biases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-30T07:14:55Z)
• Understanding and Benchmarking the Trustworthiness in Multimodal LLMs for Video Understanding [59.50808215134678]
  This study introduces Trust-videoLLMs, a first comprehensive benchmark evaluating 23 state-of-the-art videoLLMs.<n>Results reveal significant limitations in dynamic scene comprehension, cross-modal resilience and real-world risk mitigation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-14T04:04:54Z)
• The Data Minimization Principle in Machine Learning [61.17813282782266]
  Data minimization aims to reduce the amount of data collected, processed or retained. It has been endorsed by various global data protection regulations. However, its practical implementation remains a challenge due to the lack of a rigorous formulation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-29T19:40:27Z)
• A Three-Way Knot: Privacy, Fairness, and Predictive Performance Dynamics [2.9005223064604078]
  Two of the most critical issues are fairness and data privacy. The balance between privacy, fairness, and predictive performance is complex. We study this three-way tension and how the optimization of each vector impacts others.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-27T15:46:22Z)
• Auditing and Generating Synthetic Data with Controllable Trust Trade-offs [54.262044436203965]
  We introduce a holistic auditing framework that comprehensively evaluates synthetic datasets and AI models. It focuses on preventing bias and discrimination, ensures fidelity to the source data, assesses utility, robustness, and privacy preservation. We demonstrate the framework's effectiveness by auditing various generative models across diverse use cases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-21T09:03:18Z)
• Analysing Fairness of Privacy-Utility Mobility Models [11.387235721659378]
  This work defines a set of fairness metrics designed explicitly for human mobility. We examine the fairness of two state-of-the-art privacy-preserving models that rely on GAN and representation learning to reduce the re-identification rate of users for data sharing. Our results show that while both models guarantee group fairness in terms of demographic parity, they violate individual fairness criteria, indicating that users with highly similar trajectories receive disparate privacy gain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-10T11:09:18Z)
• SF-PATE: Scalable, Fair, and Private Aggregation of Teacher Ensembles [50.90773979394264]
  This paper studies a model that protects the privacy of individuals' sensitive information while also allowing it to learn non-discriminatory predictors. A key characteristic of the proposed model is to enable the adoption of off-the-selves and non-private fair models to create a privacy-preserving and fair model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-11T14:42:54Z)
• Robustness Threats of Differential Privacy [70.818129585404]
  We experimentally demonstrate that networks, trained with differential privacy, in some settings might be even more vulnerable in comparison to non-private versions. We study how the main ingredients of differentially private neural networks training, such as gradient clipping and noise addition, affect the robustness of the model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-14T18:59:24Z)
• Differentially Private and Fair Deep Learning: A Lagrangian Dual Approach [54.32266555843765]
  This paper studies a model that protects the privacy of the individuals sensitive information while also allowing it to learn non-discriminatory predictors. The method relies on the notion of differential privacy and the use of Lagrangian duality to design neural networks that can accommodate fairness constraints.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-26T10:50:33Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.