CoRe-Code: Collaborative Reinforcement Learning for Code Generation
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.24812v1
- Date: Sun, 24 May 2026 01:47:30 GMT
- Title: CoRe-Code: Collaborative Reinforcement Learning for Code Generation
- Abstract summary: Large language models (LLMs) have achieved strong performance in code generation, but most methods rely on autoregressive decoding without global planning.<n>We propose Collaborative Reinforcement Code (CoRe-Code), a framework for role specialized LLM agents that enhances inter-agent coordination to generate more accurate and efficient code.
- Score: 13.697928927084037
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have achieved strong performance in code generation, but most methods rely on autoregressive decoding without global planning, often leading to locally coherent yet globally suboptimal solutions (e.g., failing test cases or inefficient complexity). While recent approaches such as Chain-of-Thought (CoT) and multi-agent systems (MAS) introduce planning, their limited role specialization and coordination hinder performance on complex tasks. To address the challenges of coordination and specialization in multi-agent code generation, we propose Collaborative Reinforcement Code (CoRe-Code), a framework for role specialized LLM agents that enhances inter-agent coordination to generate more accurate and efficient code. CoRe-Code adopts a simple Planner-Coder paradigm, where the Planner produces high-level plans and the Coder executes them to generate code. We further introduce a collaboration-aware reinforcement learning stage based on Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) to enhance role specialization and alignment. Experiments show that CoRe-Code outperforms a wide range of existing RL-based and multi-agent methods. In addition, we demonstrate that CoRe-Code can generalize to other multi-agent frameworks (e.g., Retrieval and Debugging agents), highlighting its flexibility and scalability. We evaluate CoRe-Code on multiple benchmarks of varying difficulty using three base models. Compared to existing baselines, the results show consistent improvements in accuracy, while also achieving higher efficiency in terms of execution time and memory usage, demonstrating the effectiveness and practicality of CoRe-Code.
Related papers
- CollabCoder: Plan-Code Co-Evolution via Collaborative Decision-Making for Efficient Code Generation [4.4015036709922235]
This paper introduces CollabCoder, a novel Plan-Code Co-Evolution framework that improves code generation through dynamic multi-agent collaboration.<n>Experiments on widely used benchmarks demonstrate that CollabCoder consistently improves code quality and robustness across tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-15T14:58:26Z) - From Code Foundation Models to Agents and Applications: A Practical Guide to Code Intelligence [150.3696990310269]
Large language models (LLMs) have transformed automated software development by enabling direct translation of natural language descriptions into functional code.<n>We provide a comprehensive synthesis and practical guide (a series of analytic and probing experiments) about code LLMs.<n>We analyze the code capability of the general LLMs (GPT-4, Claude, LLaMA) and code-specialized LLMs (StarCoder, Code LLaMA, DeepSeek-Coder, and QwenCoder)
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-23T17:09:34Z) - Scaling Code-Assisted Chain-of-Thoughts and Instructions for Model Reasoning [65.20602712957725]
Caco is a novel framework that automates the synthesis of high-quality, verifiable, and diverse instruction-CoT reasoning data.<n>Our work establishes a paradigm for building self-sustaining, trustworthy reasoning systems without human intervention.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-05T07:59:24Z) - ReCode: Improving LLM-based Code Repair with Fine-Grained Retrieval-Augmented Generation [26.836612605244596]
We propose ReCode, a fine-grained retrieval-augmented in-context learning framework for accurate and efficient code repair.<n>ReCode introduces two key innovations: (1) an algorithm-aware retrieval strategy that narrows the search space using preliminary algorithm type predictions; and (2) a modular dual-encoder architecture that separately processes code and textual inputs.<n> Experimental results on RACodeBench and competitive programming datasets demonstrate that ReCode achieves higher repair accuracy with significantly reduced inference cost.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-02T13:58:48Z) - Enhancing LLM Code Generation: A Systematic Evaluation of Multi-Agent Collaboration and Runtime Debugging for Improved Accuracy, Reliability, and Latency [0.0]
We study how different programming activities compositions and training paradigms influence code generation effectiveness.<n>Our findings provide valuable insights for organizations seeking robust AI-driven coding solutions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-04T14:44:27Z) - Collab: Controlled Decoding using Mixture of Agents for LLM Alignment [90.6117569025754]
Reinforcement learning from human feedback has emerged as an effective technique to align Large Language models.<n>Controlled Decoding provides a mechanism for aligning a model at inference time without retraining.<n>We propose a mixture of agent-based decoding strategies leveraging the existing off-the-shelf aligned LLM policies.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-27T17:34:25Z) - CodeIF: Benchmarking the Instruction-Following Capabilities of Large Language Models for Code Generation [20.013757490442064]
We introduce CodeIF, the first benchmark designed to assess the abilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) to adhere to task-oriented instructions.<n>CodeIF encompasses a broad range of tasks, including function synthesis, algorithmic instructions, and code explanation.<n>We conduct extensive experiments with LLMs, analyzing their strengths and limitations in meeting the demands of these tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-26T14:19:49Z) - CodeDPO: Aligning Code Models with Self Generated and Verified Source Code [52.70310361822519]
We propose CodeDPO, a framework that integrates preference learning into code generation to improve two key code preference factors: code correctness and efficiency.<n>CodeDPO employs a novel dataset construction method, utilizing a self-generation-and-validation mechanism that simultaneously generates and evaluates code and test cases.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-08T01:36:15Z) - RL-GPT: Integrating Reinforcement Learning and Code-as-policy [82.1804241891039]
We introduce a two-level hierarchical framework, RL-GPT, comprising a slow agent and a fast agent.
The slow agent analyzes actions suitable for coding, while the fast agent executes coding tasks.
This decomposition effectively focuses each agent on specific tasks, proving highly efficient within our pipeline.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-29T16:07:22Z) - StepCoder: Improve Code Generation with Reinforcement Learning from
Compiler Feedback [58.20547418182074]
We introduce StepCoder, a novel framework for code generation, consisting of two main components.
CCCS addresses the exploration challenge by breaking the long sequences code generation task into a Curriculum of Code Completion Subtasks.
FGO only optimize the model by masking the unexecuted code segments to provide Fine-Grained Optimization.
Our method improves the ability to explore the output space and outperforms state-of-the-art approaches in corresponding benchmarks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-02T13:14:31Z) - Execution-based Code Generation using Deep Reinforcement Learning [8.085533911328577]
PPOCoder is a new framework for code generation that combines pre-trained PL models with Proximal Policy Optimization.
PPOCoder seamlessly integrates external code-specific knowledge into the model optimization process.
It's important to note that PPOCoder is a task-agnostic and model-agnostic framework that can be used across different code generation tasks and PLs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-01-31T18:02:26Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.