Investigating the Interplay between Contextual and Parametric Chain-of-Thought Faithfulness under Optimization

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.24960v1
• Date: Sun, 24 May 2026 09:16:55 GMT
• Title: Investigating the Interplay between Contextual and Parametric Chain-of-Thought Faithfulness under Optimization
• Abstract summary: Chain-of-Thought (CoT) faithfulness is typically evaluated under two disjoint paradigms.<n>We propose FaithMate, a unified preference-alignment interface for optimizing models towards either faithfulness paradigm.
• Score: 41.908827893947525
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Chain-of-Thought (CoT) faithfulness, i.e., whether CoTs genuinely reflect large language models' (LLM) underlying behavior, is typically evaluated under two disjoint paradigms: contextual faithfulness, measured by perturbing the input or CoT trace, and parametric faithfulness, assessed by intervening on a model's parametric knowledge. Yet prior work compares them only descriptively. We fill this gap by proposing FaithMate, a unified preference-alignment interface for optimizing models towards either faithfulness paradigm. It enables us to investigate the interplay between the two paradigms, examining whether and to what extent faithfulness gains generalize within and across paradigms. Across three models, two datasets, and six faithfulness metrics, we find that the two paradigms are positively coupled, yet asymmetric: optimizing towards parametric faithfulness yields consistent gains across both paradigms, whereas the contextual counterpart delivers more variable gains. Within the contextual paradigm, faithfulness gains on one metric do not consistently transfer to others, implying that existing contextual metrics capture disjoint facets of faithfulness and exposing inherent trade-offs. These findings imply that CoT faithfulness is not a monolithic objective and therefore requires multifaceted optimization and evaluation.

Related papers

• Traits Run Deeper: Trait-Specific Asymmetric Fusion for Personality Assessment [53.50824432699408]
  Traits Run Deeper is a novel personality assessment framework.<n>It consists of three components: the Multimodal Foundation Representation (MFR), the Trait-Specific Modality Fusion (TSMF) and the Distribution-Calibrated Personality Regression (DCPR)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-09T06:38:36Z)
• Faithfulness Metrics Don't Measure Faithfulness: A Meta-Evaluation with Ground Truth [24.21103008618097]
  Chains of thought (CoTs) have become central in interpreting and auditing behaviors of large language models.<n>We develop an automated labeling pipeline that yields ground-truth faithfulness labels at both the step and CoT level.<n>Our experiments show that most metrics perform near chance, exhibit strong prediction biases and degrade on longer CoTs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-24T12:57:01Z)
• Chain of Modality: From Static Fusion to Dynamic Orchestration in Omni-MLLMs [84.3271821505699]
  Chain of Modality (CoM) is an agentic framework that transitions multimodal fusion from passive concatenation to dynamic orchestration.<n> operating in either a training-free or a data-efficient SFT setting, CoM achieves robust and consistent generalization across diverse benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-16T01:21:14Z)
• FACT-E: Causality-Inspired Evaluation for Trustworthy Chain-of-Thought Reasoning [49.65751420291115]
  Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting has improved LLM reasoning, but models often generate explanations that appear coherent while containing unfaithful intermediate steps.<n>We propose FACT-E, a causality-inspired framework for evaluating CoT quality.<n>We show that FACT-E improves reasoning-trajectory selection and yields stronger in-context learnings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-12T15:35:08Z)
• Test-Time Consistency in Vision Language Models [26.475993408532304]
  Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have achieved impressive performance across a wide range of multimodal tasks.<n>Recent benchmarks, such as MM-R3, highlight that even state-of-the-art VLMs can produce divergent predictions across semantically equivalent inputs.<n>We propose a simple and effective test-time consistency framework that enhances semantic consistency without supervised re-training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-27T17:09:44Z)
• GSSF: Generalized Structural Sparse Function for Deep Cross-modal Metric Learning [51.677086019209554]
  We propose a Generalized Structural Sparse to capture powerful relationships across modalities for pair-wise similarity learning. The distance metric delicately encapsulates two formats of diagonal and block-diagonal terms. Experiments on cross-modal and two extra uni-modal retrieval tasks have validated its superiority and flexibility.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-20T03:45:50Z)
• Synergistic Anchored Contrastive Pre-training for Few-Shot Relation Extraction [4.7220779071424985]
  Few-shot Relation Extraction (FSRE) aims to extract facts from a sparse set of labeled corpora. Recent studies have shown promising results in FSRE by employing Pre-trained Language Models. We introduce a novel synergistic anchored contrastive pre-training framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-19T10:16:24Z)
• Prototype-based Aleatoric Uncertainty Quantification for Cross-modal Retrieval [139.21955930418815]
  Cross-modal Retrieval methods build similarity relations between vision and language modalities by jointly learning a common representation space. However, the predictions are often unreliable due to the Aleatoric uncertainty, which is induced by low-quality data, e.g., corrupt images, fast-paced videos, and non-detailed texts. We propose a novel Prototype-based Aleatoric Uncertainty Quantification (PAU) framework to provide trustworthy predictions by quantifying the uncertainty arisen from the inherent data ambiguity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-29T09:41:19Z)
• ConMatch: Semi-Supervised Learning with Confidence-Guided Consistency Regularization [26.542718087103665]
  We present a novel semi-supervised learning framework that intelligently leverages the consistency regularization between the model's predictions from two strongly-augmented views of an image, weighted by a confidence of pseudo-label, dubbed ConMatch. We conduct experiments to demonstrate the effectiveness of our ConMatch over the latest methods and provide extensive ablation studies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-18T04:37:50Z)
• Forget-me-not! Contrastive Critics for Mitigating Posterior Collapse [20.258298183228824]
  We introduce inference critics that detect and incentivize against posterior collapse by requiring correspondence between latent variables and the observations. This approach is straightforward to implement and requires significantly less training time than prior methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-19T20:07:17Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.