Related papers: The Illusion of Competence: Self-Perceived Digital Literacy and AI Readiness Among European Secondary Students

The Illusion of Competence: Self-Perceived Digital Literacy and AI Readiness Among European Secondary Students

URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.26010v1
Date: Mon, 25 May 2026 16:29:03 GMT
Title: The Illusion of Competence: Self-Perceived Digital Literacy and AI Readiness Among European Secondary Students
Abstract summary: This study investigates the gap between self-perceived digital literacy and actual technical readiness.<n>Students report near-maximum self-efficacy in passive digital consumption but exhibit a sharp decline when evaluating active technological creation and algorithmic logic.
Score: 35.18016233072556
License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Abstract: The ubiquitous presence of digital devices has cemented the 'Digital Native' paradigm, assuming inherent technological proficiency among contemporary youth. This multicenter study ($N=243$ European secondary students) challenges this narrative by investigating the gap between self-perceived digital literacy and actual technical readiness, including Artificial Intelligence (AI) interaction. Our findings reveal a severe Confidence-Competence Divide characterized by a collective Dunning-Kruger effect: students report near-maximum self-efficacy in passive digital consumption but exhibit a sharp decline when evaluating active technological creation and algorithmic logic. Crucially, an intra-pathway analysis demonstrates that the technological gender gap is not universal; rather, it emerges significantly exclusively within Technology-oriented classrooms ($p = 0.046$), indicating the persistence of 'stereotype threat' in formal STEM environments. Additionally, the study uncovers an 'AI Paradox' wherein students significantly overestimate their critical awareness of deepfakes and algorithmic biases compared to their operational AI skills, fostering a false sense of invulnerability against modern misinformation. Ultimately, supported by an overwhelming student demand ($76.5\%$) for pedagogical reform, this research concludes that dismantling this illusion of competence requires abandoning passive theoretical instruction in favor of hands-on, active technological creation.

Related papers

Learning after COVID-19 and the ICT career aspirations: Are students entering the AI era with weaker skills? [7.765662835417495]
The analysis uses country-level data from PISA 2018 and 2022, combining indicators of student autonomy, digital skills and teacher support.<n>Results show a global but uneven increase in ICT career aspirations.<n>Digital skills emerge as the strongest and most consistent predictor, while teacher support plays a complementary role.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-17T13:30:36Z)
AI Literacy, Safety Awareness, and STEM Career Aspirations of Australian Secondary Students: Evaluating the Impact of Workshop Interventions [38.350232667249095]
Deepfakes and other forms of synthetic media pose growing safety risks for adolescents.<n>This study evaluates the impact of Day of AI Australia's workshop-based intervention on Australian secondary students.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-30T02:55:53Z)
Industrialized Deception: The Collateral Effects of LLM-Generated Misinformation on Digital Ecosystems [47.03825808787752]
This paper transitions from literature review to practical countermeasures.<n>We report on improved AI-generated content through Large Language Models (LLMs) and multimodal systems.<n>We discuss mitigation strategies including LLM-based detection, inoculation approaches, and the dual-use nature of generative AI.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-29T16:42:22Z)
ChatGPT and Gemini participated in the Korean College Scholastic Ability Test -- Earth Science I [0.0]
This study utilizes the Earth Science I section of the 2025 Korean College Scholastic Ability Test (CSAT) to analyze the multimodal scientific reasoning capabilities and cognitive limitations of state-of-the-art Large Language Models (LLMs)<n> Quantitative results indicated that unstructured inputs led to significant performance degradation due to segmentation and Optical Character Recognition (OCR) failures.<n>By exploiting AI's weaknesses, educators can distinguish genuine student competency from AI-generated responses, thereby ensuring assessment fairness.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-17T10:46:41Z)
Deploying AI for Signal Processing education: Selected challenges and intriguing opportunities [44.18936398140735]
Article explores the use of AI tools to facilitate and enhance education.<n> Primers are provided on several core technical issues that arise when using AI in educational settings.<n>The article serves as a resource for researchers and educators seeking to advance AI's role in engineering education.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-10T19:19:26Z)
Distinguishing Fact from Fiction: Student Traits, Attitudes, and AI Hallucination Detection in Business School Assessment [2.3359837623080613]
We examine how academic skills, cognitive traits, and AI scepticism influence students' ability to detect factually incorrect AI-generated responses (hallucinations) in a high-stakes assessment at a UK business school.<n>We find that only 20% successfully identified the hallucination, with strong academic performance, interpretive skills thinking, writing proficiency, and AI scepticism emerging as key predictors.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-28T18:39:57Z)
Beyond Detection: Designing AI-Resilient Assessments with Automated Feedback Tool to Foster Critical Thinking [0.0]
This research proposes a proactive, AI-resilient solution based on assessment design rather than detection.<n>It introduces a web-based Python tool that integrates Bloom's taxonomy with advanced natural language processing techniques.<n>It helps educators determine whether a task targets lower-order thinking such as recall and summarization or higher-order skills such as analysis, evaluation, and creation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-30T23:13:00Z)
Perceptions of Discriminatory Decisions of Artificial Intelligence: Unpacking the Role of Individual Characteristics [0.0]
Personal differences (digital self-efficacy, technical knowledge, belief in equality, political ideology) are associated with perceptions of AI outcomes. Digital self-efficacy and technical knowledge are positively associated with attitudes toward AI. Liberal ideologies are negatively associated with outcome trust, higher negative emotion, and greater skepticism.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-17T06:18:26Z)
Deepfake Media Forensics: State of the Art and Challenges Ahead [51.33414186878676]
AI-generated synthetic media, also called Deepfakes, have influenced so many domains, from entertainment to cybersecurity. Deepfake detection has become a vital area of research, focusing on identifying subtle inconsistencies and artifacts with machine learning techniques. This paper reviews the primary algorithms that address these challenges, examining their advantages, limitations, and future prospects.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-01T08:57:47Z)
Brain-inspired Computational Intelligence via Predictive Coding [73.42407863671565]
Predictive coding (PC) has shown promising properties that make it potentially valuable for the machine learning community.<n>PC-like algorithms are starting to be present in multiple sub-fields of machine learning and AI at large.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-15T16:37:16Z)
Investigating Participation Mechanisms in EU Code Week [68.8204255655161]
Digital competence (DC) is a broad set of skills, attitudes, and knowledge for confident, critical and use of digital technologies. The aim of the manuscript is to offer a detailed and comprehensive statistical description of Code Week's participation in the EU Member States.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-05-29T19:16:03Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.