Your Agents Are Aging Too: Agent Lifespan Engineering for Deployed Systems

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.26302v1
• Date: Mon, 25 May 2026 19:55:12 GMT
• Title: Your Agents Are Aging Too: Agent Lifespan Engineering for Deployed Systems
• Abstract summary: Long-lived AI agents are increasingly deployed as persistent operational systems.<n>How long does an agent remain reliable after deployment?<n>We introduce AgingBench, a longitudinal reliability benchmark for agent lifespan engineering.
• Score: 60.79651380135334
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Long-lived AI agents are increasingly deployed as persistent operational systems, yet they are still evaluated like freshly initialized models. Day-one benchmarks miss a basic systems question: how long does an agent remain reliable after deployment? Even when model weights are frozen, an agent's effective state keeps changing as it compresses interaction history, retrieves from a growing memory store, revises facts after updates, and undergoes routine maintenance. Reliability therefore becomes a lifespan property of the full agent harness, not only a snapshot property of the base model. We introduce AgingBench, a longitudinal reliability benchmark for agent lifespan engineering: measuring not only whether deployed agents degrade, but what form the degradation takes and where repair should target. AgingBench organizes agent aging into four mechanisms: compression aging, interference aging, revision aging, and maintenance aging. To diagnose these failures, AgingBench uses temporal dependency graphs and paired counterfactual probes that produce diagnostic profiles for the write, retrieval, and utilization stages of the memory pipeline. Across 7 scenarios, 14 models, multiple memory policies, and both runner-controlled and autonomous agents, over ~400 runs spanning 8 - 200 sessions show that agent aging is not one-dimensional: behavioral tests can remain clean while factual precision decays; derived-state tracking can collapse sharply within a single model; and the same wrong answer can require different repairs depending on what the diagnostic profile points to. These results suggest that reliable agent deployment requires lifespan evaluation, mechanism-level diagnosis, and stage-targeted repair, not only stronger day-one models.

Related papers

• PAST-Bench: Benchmarking the Foundations of Recursive Self-Improvement in Personal Agents [50.9061759859778]
  PAST-Bench is a benchmark designed to isolate whether retained experience actually improves agents over time.<n>We report both later-task gains and whether those gains follow the intended save, retrieve, and update pathway.<n>We develop Hermes+, which extends Hermes with five targeted interventions across stages of the agent loop.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-04T17:58:05Z)
• ScrambleToolBench: Agents Search Exhaustively Even When Their Own Map Points to the Next Step [74.83535434786145]
  We introduce ScrambleToolBench, an interactive terminal benchmark designed to isolate behavioral reasoning.<n>The benchmark requires agents to uncover hidden tool behaviors entirely through trial-and-error interaction.<n>Our evaluation of state-of-the-art language models reveals that successful initial discovery does not translate into robust adaptation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-03T15:07:46Z)
• PhyAgentOS: A Self-Evolving Operating System for Embodied Agents with Decoupled Cognitive Planning and Physical Execution [49.776611937968]
  We present PhyAgentOS, a foundation delivering scheduling, verification, memory, benchmarking, and safety as system-level services.<n>Its Session-Centered treats a session, not an action, as the minimum unit of scheduling, compatibility, supervised execution, evidence collection, and acceptance.<n>SessionVerifier distinguishes execution termination from semantic task completion via evidence-grounded verdicts of success, failure, or replan.<n> Benchmarking reuses the deployment session and verification path, so results trace to real execution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-18T04:46:53Z)
• AgentTether: Graph-Guided Diagnosis and Runtime Intervention for Reliable LLM Agent Operation [27.0859707906163]
  AgentTether is a run-time repair framework that automates post-run diagnosis and guided recovery without modifying the underlying agent or environment.<n>It localizes failure-critical subtrajectories by combining an offline normal-behavior model with a run-local graph detector.<n>It can be deployed as an offline diagnostic-and-guidance tool or as an online repair layer.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-07T13:40:31Z)
• SEAGym: An Evaluation Environment for Self-Evolving LLM Agents [30.362414820430402]
  SEAGym is an evaluation environment for measuring agent harness updates across training, validation, test, replay, and cost records.<n>It turns Harbor-compatible benchmarks into dynamic self-evolution task sources with train batches, frozen update-validation, held-out ID and OOD transfer views, replay diagnostics, and saved snapshot and metric records.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-16T05:50:55Z)
• ClawForge: Generating Executable Interactive Benchmarks for Command-Line Agents [59.626170560327274]
  We present textbfClawForge, a generator-backed benchmark framework for executable command-line categories under state conflict.<n>We instantiate this framework as the ClawForge-Bench (17 scenarios, 6 ability categories)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-13T21:34:08Z)
• Beyond the Black Box: Interpretability of Agentic AI Tool Use [0.0]
  We introduce a mechanistic-interpretability toolkit built on Sparse Autoencoders and linear probes.<n>The framework reads model states before each action and infers both whether a tool is needed and how consequential the next tool action is likely to be.<n>We train the probes on multi-step trajectories from the NVIDIA Nemotron function-calling dataset and apply the same workflow to GPT-OSS 20B and Gemma 3 27B models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-07T19:47:30Z)
• AgentProcessBench: Diagnosing Step-Level Process Quality in Tool-Using Agents [50.481033105867205]
  We introduce AgentProcessBench, the first benchmark dedicated to evaluating step-level effectiveness in realistic, tool-augmented trajectories.<n>The benchmark comprises 1,000 diverse trajectories and 8,509 human-labeled step annotations with 89.1% inter-annotator agreement.<n>It features a ternary labeling scheme to capture exploration and an error propagation rule to reduce labeling ambiguity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-15T16:13:58Z)
• MemoryGraft: Persistent Compromise of LLM Agents via Poisoned Experience Retrieval [5.734678752740074]
  MemoryGraft is a novel indirect injection attack that compromises agent behavior not through immediate jailbreaks, but by implanting malicious successful experiences into the agent's long-term memory.<n>We demonstrate that an attacker who can supply benign ingestion-level artifacts that the agent reads during execution can induce it to construct a poisoned RAG store.<n>When the agent later encounters semantically similar tasks, union retrieval over lexical templates and embedding similarity reliably surfaces these grafted memories, and the agent adopts the embedded unsafe patterns, leading to persistent behavioral drift across sessions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-18T08:34:40Z)
• VIGIL: A Reflective Runtime for Self-Healing Agents [0.0]
  We present VIGIL, a reflective runtime that supervises a sibling agent and performs autonomous maintenance rather than task execution.<n> VIGIL ingests behavioral logs, appraises each event into a structured emotional representation, maintains a persistent EmoBank with decay and contextual policies, and derives an RBT diagnosis that sorts recent behavior into strengths, opportunities, and failures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-08T02:18:41Z)
• Impatient Users Confuse AI Agents: High-fidelity Simulations of Human Traits for Testing Agents [58.00130492861884]
  TraitBasis is a lightweight, model-agnostic method for systematically stress testing AI agents.<n>TraitBasis learns directions in activation space corresponding to steerable user traits.<n>We observe on average a 2%-30% performance degradation on $tau$-Trait across frontier models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-06T05:03:57Z)
• Where LLM Agents Fail and How They can Learn From Failures [62.196870049524364]
  Large Language Model (LLM) agents have shown promise in solving complex, multi-step tasks.<n>They amplify vulnerability to cascading failures, where a single root-cause error propagates through subsequent decisions.<n>Current systems lack a framework that can comprehensively understand agent error in a modular and systemic way.<n>We introduce the AgentErrorTaxonomy, a modular classification of failure modes spanning memory, reflection, planning, action, and system-level operations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-29T18:20:27Z)
• AgentGuard: Runtime Verification of AI Agents [1.14219428942199]
  AgentGuard is a framework for runtime verification of Agentic AI systems.<n>It provides continuous, quantitative assurance through a new paradigm called Dynamic Probabilistic Assurance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-28T13:08:50Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.