The Environmental Costs of Surveillance Capitalism: A Case Study of Social Media Platforms

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.26314v1
• Date: Mon, 25 May 2026 20:12:44 GMT
• Title: The Environmental Costs of Surveillance Capitalism: A Case Study of Social Media Platforms
• Abstract summary: Business model of surveillance capitalism relies on extensive material infrastructure.<n>This paper is motivated by the question: how much of the rising carbon impact of ICT can be attributed to this material infrastructure?<n>We propose a conceptual framework that links processes of surveillance with their underlying material realities.
• Score: 1.2318267573115809
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The business model of surveillance capitalism, premised on the extraction of behavioral data and its predictive potential for profit, relies on extensive material infrastructure. Such profit is typically driven by practices such as telemetry, user tracking, data analytics, secondary data uses, increased user engagement, and AI model training, as well as large-scale data storage systems that retain personal information for sale or reuse. This paper is motivated by the question: how much of the rising carbon impact of ICT can be attributed to this material infrastructure? Such an inquiry provides a foundation for quantifying the environmental costs of surveillance capitalism by proposing a conceptual framework and research direction that link processes of surveillance with their underlying material realities. To demonstrate the applicability of this framework, we examine the proportion of network traffic caused by surveillance capitalism processes through a comparative case study of a corporate social media platform, X/formerly Twitter, and a decentralized, non-commercial alternative, Mastodon. Our findings highlight the existence of corporate overhead: excess resource consumption driven by corporate social media practices, which is used as an initial proxy for the activities of surveillance capitalism. Our findings further demonstrate how the corporate overhead of X can be used to establish a lower bound in CO2e emissions attributable to for-profit activities that do not contribute to the user experience.

Related papers

• How Hyper-Datafication Impacts the Sustainability Costs in Frontier AI [7.995068383762489]
  We examine the environmental, social, and economic costs of large-scale data in AI through a sustainability lens.<n>We analyse approximately 550,000 datasets from the Hugging Face Hub.<n>We propose Data PROOFS recommendations spanning provenance, resource awareness, ownership, openness, frugality, and standards.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-20T00:54:37Z)
• A Sustainable AI Economy Needs Data Deals That Work for Generators [56.949279542190084]
  We argue that the machine learning value chain is structurally unsustainable due to an economic data processing inequality.<n>We analyze 73 public data deals and show that the majority of value accrues to aggregators.<n>We propose an Equitable Data-Value Exchange Framework to enable a minimal market that benefits all participants.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-15T01:05:48Z)
• An Empirical Inquiry into Surveillance Capitalism: Web Tracking [0.0]
  This paper analyzes patterns and trends in web tracking data to establish empirical evidence of Surveillance Capitalism's extraction mechanisms.<n>Our findings reveal Google's omnipresent position on the web, a three-tier stratification among companies in the surveillance space, and evidence suggesting an evolution of tracking techniques to evade detection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-10T18:46:43Z)
• Towards Network Data Analytics in 5G Systems and Beyond [0.6906005491572401]
  Data has become a critical asset in the digital economy, yet it remains underutilized by Mobile Network Operators (MNOs)<n>This study analyzes trends and gaps in more than 70 articles and proposes two novel use cases to promote the adoption of NWDAF and explore its potential for monetization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-05T10:26:53Z)
• Promoting User Data Autonomy During the Dissolution of a Monopolistic Firm [5.864623711097197]
  We show how the framework of Conscious Data Contribution can enable user autonomy during under dissolution. We explore how fine-tuning and the phenomenon of "catastrophic forgetting" could actually prove beneficial as a type of machine unlearning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-20T18:55:51Z)
• Decoding the Silent Majority: Inducing Belief Augmented Social Graph with Large Language Model for Response Forecasting [74.68371461260946]
  SocialSense is a framework that induces a belief-centered graph on top of an existent social network, along with graph-based propagation to capture social dynamics. Our method surpasses existing state-of-the-art in experimental evaluations for both zero-shot and supervised settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-20T06:17:02Z)
• Navigating Surveillance Capitalism: A Critical Analysis through philosophical perspectives in Computer Ethics [0.0]
  Surveillance capitalism is the practice of collecting and analyzing massive amounts of user data. Tech companies like Google and Facebook use users' personal information to deliver personalized content and advertisements. Another example of surveillance capitalism is the use of military technology to collect and analyze data for national security purposes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-05T18:37:56Z)
• Data Considerations in Graph Representation Learning for Supply Chain Networks [64.72135325074963]
  We present a graph representation learning approach to uncover hidden dependency links. We demonstrate that our representation facilitates state-of-the-art performance on link prediction of a global automotive supply chain network.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-22T12:28:15Z)
• Enhancing User' s Income Estimation with Super-App Alternative Data [59.60094442546867]
  It compares the performance of these alternative data sources with the performance of industry-accepted bureau income estimators. Ultimately, this paper shows the incentive for financial institutions to seek to incorporate alternative data into constructing their risk profiles.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-12T21:34:44Z)
• Supporting Financial Inclusion with Graph Machine Learning and Super-App Alternative Data [63.942632088208505]
  Super-Apps have changed the way we think about the interactions between users and commerce. This paper investigates how different interactions between users within a Super-App provide a new source of information to predict borrower behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-19T15:13:06Z)
• Explainable Patterns: Going from Findings to Insights to Support Data Analytics Democratization [60.18814584837969]
  We present Explainable Patterns (ExPatt), a new framework to support lay users in exploring and creating data storytellings. ExPatt automatically generates plausible explanations for observed or selected findings using an external (textual) source of information.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-19T16:13:44Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.