Eliot: Interactively $\underline{E}$xploring Fast-Changing Scientific $\underline{Li}$terature Trends with $\underline{O}$nline Da$\underline{t}$a and Learning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.27610v1
• Date: Tue, 26 May 2026 19:25:43 GMT
• Title: Eliot: Interactively $\underline{E}$xploring Fast-Changing Scientific $\underline{Li}$terature Trends with $\underline{O}$nline Da$\underline{t}$a and Learning
• Abstract summary: $texttEliot$ is an interactive system for traceable exploration of evolving literature.<n>It retrieves arXiv papers at query time, represents each paper by title and abstract, clusters the corpus into themes, and visualizes each cluster's publication-year distribution.<n>$texttEliot$ is most valuable for auditable overviews of rapidly changing technical areas.
• Score: 8.908016246200427
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The rapid growth of scientific publishing has made it increasingly difficult to track how fast-moving areas evolve. Search engines and LLM-based assistants retrieve or summarize papers, but often hide how the corpus was selected, organized, or connected to temporal patterns. We present $\texttt{Eliot}$, a publicly deployed interactive system for traceable exploration of evolving scientific literature. Motivated by two studies on Large Language Models (LLMs) and Automated Planning and Scheduling (APS), $\texttt{Eliot}$ generalizes literature-evolution analysis beyond hand-built taxonomies and domain-specific scripts. Given explicit query terms and filters, it retrieves arXiv papers at query time, represents each paper by title and abstract, clusters the corpus into themes, assigns representative keywords, and visualizes each cluster's publication-year distribution. We evaluate $\texttt{Eliot}$ as both an applied system and an interactive research aid. An offline configuration study across eight arXiv domains compares document representations, dimensionality reduction methods, and clustering algorithms using intrinsic clustering and topic-coherence metrics; the results support MiniLM embeddings with 10-dimensional UMAP and Agglomerative Clustering as a practical default. A scenario-based survey and expert focus group assess interpretability and use contexts: participants rated cluster labels as meaningful in 85% of scenario responses, and feedback indicated that $\texttt{Eliot}$ is most valuable for auditable overviews of rapidly changing technical areas. These results suggest that query-time clustering and temporal inspection can complement search and generation tools by helping researchers inspect and refine the evidence behind literature trends.

Related papers

• Deep Academic Survey: Stateful Agentic Closed-Loop Paradigm for Academic Survey Automation [60.151050016855834]
  DAS is a stateful agentic framework for generating publication-oriented academic surveys.<n>Its key idea is to separate reusable paper analysis from topic-specific manuscript construction.<n>DAS achieves the highest average in all four dimensions, with an overall score of 4.34 compared with 4.03 for the strongest competitor.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-18T17:29:00Z)
• Paper Circle: An Open-source Multi-agent Research Discovery and Analysis Framework [82.66443886385125]
  Paper Circle is a discovery and analysis system designed to reduce the effort required to find, assess, organize, and understand academic literature.<n>The system comprises two complementary pipelines: (1) a Discovery Pipeline that integrates offline and online retrieval from multiple sources, multi-agent scoring, diversity-aware ranking, and structured outputs; and (2) an Analysis Pipeline that transforms individual papers into structured knowledge graphs with typed nodes such as concepts, methods, and figures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-07T17:59:58Z)
• SciFig: Towards Automating Scientific Figure Generation [41.73701976318102]
  SciFig is an end-to-end AI agent system that generates publication-ready pipeline figures directly from research paper texts.<n>We introduce a rubric-based evaluation framework that analyzes 2,219 real scientific figures to extract evaluation rubrics.<n>SciFig demonstrates remarkable performance: achieving 70.1$%$ overall quality on dataset-level evaluation and 66.2$%$ on paper-specific evaluation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-07T20:56:58Z)
• OpenNovelty: An LLM-powered Agentic System for Verifiable Scholarly Novelty Assessment [63.662126457336534]
  OpenNovelty is an agentic system for transparent, evidence-based novelty analysis.<n>It grounds all assessments in retrieved real papers, ensuring verifiable judgments.<n>OpenNovelty aims to empower the research community with a scalable tool that promotes fair, consistent, and evidence-backed peer review.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-04T15:48:51Z)
• Intelligent Scientific Literature Explorer using Machine Learning (ISLE) [0.797970449705065]
  This paper presents an integrated system for scientific literature exploration that combines large-scale data acquisition, hybrid retrieval, semantic topic modeling, and heterogeneous knowledge graph construction.<n>The proposed framework contributes a foundation for AI-assisted scientific discovery.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-14T16:54:24Z)
• GraphMind: Interactive Novelty Assessment System for Accelerating Scientific Discovery [20.945875851329244]
  $textbfGraphMind$ is an easy-to-use interactive web tool designed to assist users in evaluating the novelty of scientific papers or drafted ideas.<n>$textbfGraphMind$ enables users to capture the main structure of a scientific paper, explore related ideas through various perspectives, and assess novelty.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-17T14:49:07Z)
• Scaling Beyond Context: A Survey of Multimodal Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Document Understanding [61.36285696607487]
  Document understanding is critical for applications from financial analysis to scientific discovery.<n>Current approaches, whether OCR-based pipelines feeding Large Language Models (LLMs) or native Multimodal LLMs (MLLMs) face key limitations.<n>Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) helps ground models in external data, but documents' multimodal nature, combining text, tables, charts, and layout, demands a more advanced paradigm: Multimodal RAG.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-17T02:33:16Z)
• SurveyG: A Multi-Agent LLM Framework with Hierarchical Citation Graph for Automated Survey Generation [4.512335376984058]
  Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly adopted for automating survey paper generation.<n>We propose textbfSurveyG, an LLM-based agent framework that integrates textithierarchical citation graph<n>The graph is organized into three layers: textbfFoundation, textbfDevelopment, and textbfFrontier, to capture the evolution of research from seminal works to incremental advances and emerging directions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-09T03:14:20Z)
• Context-Aware Hierarchical Taxonomy Generation for Scientific Papers via LLM-Guided Multi-Aspect Clustering [59.54662810933882]
  Existing taxonomy construction methods, leveraging unsupervised clustering or direct prompting of large language models, often lack coherence and granularity.<n>We propose a novel context-aware hierarchical taxonomy generation framework that integrates LLM-guided multi-aspect encoding with dynamic clustering.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-23T15:12:58Z)
• SCALE: Towards Collaborative Content Analysis in Social Science with Large Language Model Agents and Human Intervention [50.07342730395946]
  We introduce a novel multi-agent framework that effectively.<n>imulates $underlinetextbfC$ontent $underlinetextbfA$nalysis via.<n>underlinetextbfL$arge language model (LLM) agunderlinetextbfE$nts.<n>It imitates key phases of content analysis, including text coding, collaborative discussion, and dynamic codebook evolution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-16T00:19:07Z)
• Taxonomy Tree Generation from Citation Graph [15.188580557890942]
  HiGTL is a novel end-to-end framework guided by human-provided instructions or preferred topics.<n>We develop a novel taxonomy node verbalization strategy that iteratively generates central concepts for each cluster.<n>Experiments demonstrate that HiGTL effectively produces coherent, high-quality concept.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-02T13:02:03Z)
• Providing Insights for Open-Response Surveys via End-to-End Context-Aware Clustering [2.6094411360258185]
  In this work, we present a novel end-to-end context-aware framework that extracts, aggregates, and abbreviates embedded semantic patterns in open-response survey data. Our framework relies on a pre-trained natural language model in order to encode the textual data into semantic vectors. Our framework reduces the costs at-scale by automating the process of extracting the most insightful information pieces from survey data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-02T18:24:10Z)
• Author Clustering and Topic Estimation for Short Texts [69.54017251622211]
  We propose a novel model that expands on the Latent Dirichlet Allocation by modeling strong dependence among the words in the same document. We also simultaneously cluster users, removing the need for post-hoc cluster estimation. Our method performs as well as -- or better -- than traditional approaches to problems arising in short text.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-15T20:55:55Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.