Do Agents Need Semantic Metadata? A Comparative Study in Agentic Data Retrieval

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.28787v1
• Date: Wed, 27 May 2026 17:46:43 GMT
• Title: Do Agents Need Semantic Metadata? A Comparative Study in Agentic Data Retrieval
• Abstract summary: The rise of Large Language Models (LLMs) capable of navigating the unstructured web raises a fundamental question: Is semantic metadata still necessary for agentic data discovery?<n>We present a comparative analysis of agentic data retrieval across two distinct environments: a Baseline Agent searching billions of open-web documents, and a Semantic Agent leveraging a corpus of 90 million datasets using schema.org.<n>The Semantic Agent excels at retrieving actionable data, achieving a 44.9% higher precision for metadata-rich registries and a 46.6% higher precision for pages with machine-readable downloads among its returned results.
• Score: 3.6202634353482352
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: In the era of autonomous agents, machine-actionable data is critical for data-driven workflows. For more than a decade, semantic metadata like schema.org has anchored the FAIR principles (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable) for machine-actionable data and enabled discovery tools like Google Dataset Search. However, the rise of Large Language Models (LLMs) capable of navigating the unstructured web raises a fundamental question: Is semantic metadata still necessary for agentic data discovery, or can agents reliably retrieve actionable data directly from the web? We present a comparative analysis of agentic data retrieval across two distinct environments: a Baseline Agent searching billions of open-web documents, and a Semantic Agent leveraging a corpus of 90 million datasets using schema.org. We deploy an "LLM-as-a-judge" evaluation pipeline, mapped directly to the FAIR principles, to assess the semantic relevance, data accessibility, and computational utility of the retrieved data. Our results reveal a clear divergence. The Semantic Agent excels at retrieving actionable data, achieving a 44.9% higher precision for metadata-rich registries and a 46.6% higher precision for pages with machine-readable downloads among its returned results. Conversely, the Baseline Agent frequently suffers "Last-Mile Utility" failures, retrieving prose-heavy pages (20.1% of results) and portal landing pages (8.5%) rather than actual data pages. While the Baseline Agent achieves higher coverage by answering 40% more questions, the Semantic Agent delivers greater accuracy, achieving 65.7% higher overall precision in retrieving FAIR-compliant datasets. We conclude that while unstructured retrieval supports broad exploratory tasks, structured ecosystems remain the indispensable foundation for reliable, execution-oriented autonomous workflows.

Related papers

• DSAgentBench: Can Agents Automate End-to-End Data-Science Workflows in Real Computer Environments? [40.322111941653134]
  We introduce DSAgentBench, the first benchmark to evaluate whether agents can automate full data-science inside real computer environments.<n>Our experiments show that even the strongest agent, Claude-4.6-Sonnet, achieves only 56.70% task success.<n>These results reveal a substantial capability gap between current agentic systems and real data-science.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-11T01:45:56Z)
• DataSpace: Benchmarking Data Agents for Verifiable Analytics over Heterogeneous Workspaces [25.28248447900504]
  Data agents enable natural-language analytics over organizational workspaces.<n>Existing benchmarks largely isolate structured querying, retrieval, or open-ended analysis.<n>We introduce DataSpace, a benchmark in which data agents produce verifiable tabular results.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-04T10:48:11Z)
• SearchOS-V1: Towards Robust Open-Domain Information-Seeking Agent Collaboration [77.28003194268977]
  SearchOS is a system-level multi-agent framework that turns fragile, implicit search progress into explicit, persistent, and shared state.<n>Built on SOCM, SearchOS applies a pipeline-parallel scheduling mechanism that overlaps the execution of sub-agents.<n>SearchOS leads all metrics among the evaluated single- and multi-agent baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-16T17:51:23Z)
• AgentIR: Reasoning-Aware Retrieval for Deep Research Agents [76.29382561831105]
  Deep Research agents generate explicit natural language reasoning before each search call.<n> Reasoning-Aware Retrieval embeds the agent's reasoning trace alongside its query.<n>DR- Synth generates Deep Research retriever training data from standard QA datasets.<n>AgentIR-4B achieves 68% accuracy with the open-weight agent Tongyi-DeepResearch.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-04T18:47:26Z)
• AgentExpt: Automating AI Experiment Design with LLM-based Resource Retrieval Agent [36.65355075707938]
  One key application in AI research is to automate experiment design through agentic and baseline retrieval.<n>We present a comprehensive framework for baseline and dataset recommendation.<n>We develop a reasoning-augmented reranker that exact interaction chains to construct explicit reasoning chains and finetunes a large language model to produce interpretable justifications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-07T01:51:56Z)
• Enterprise Deep Research: Steerable Multi-Agent Deep Research for Enterprise Analytics [75.4712507893024]
  Enterprise Deep Research (EDR) is a multi-agent system that integrates a Master Planning Agent for adaptive query decomposition.<n>Four specialized search agents (General, Academic, GitHub, LinkedIn) and a visualization agent for data-driven insights are also included.<n>EDR reflects research direction with optional human-in-the-loop steering guidance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-20T17:55:11Z)
• InfoAgent: Advancing Autonomous Information-Seeking Agents [143.15973604285304]
  We introduce InfoAgent, a deep research agent powered by an innovative data synthesis pipeline and orchestrated web search tools.<n>With our methods, InfoAgent achieves 15.3% accuracy on BrowseComp, 29.2% on BrowseComp-ZH, and 40.4% on Xbench-DS.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-29T17:59:57Z)
• AgenticData: An Agentic Data Analytics System for Heterogeneous Data [12.67277567222908]
  AgenticData is an agentic data analytics system that allows users to pose natural language (NL) questions while autonomously analyzing data sources across multiple domains.<n>We propose a multi-agent collaboration strategy by utilizing a data profiling agent for discovering relevant data, a semantic cross-validation agent for iterative optimization based on feedback, and a smart memory agent for maintaining short-term context.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-07T03:33:59Z)
• WebDS: An End-to-End Benchmark for Web-based Data Science [59.270670758607494]
  WebDS is the first end-to-end web-based data science benchmark.<n>It comprises 870 web-based data science tasks across 29 diverse websites.<n>WebDS sets the stage for significant advances in the development of practically useful LLM-based data science.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-02T06:39:59Z)
• InfiAgent-DABench: Evaluating Agents on Data Analysis Tasks [84.7788065721689]
  In this paper, we introduce InfiAgent-DABench, the first benchmark specifically designed to evaluate LLM-based agents on data analysis tasks. This benchmark contains DAEval, a dataset consisting of 257 data analysis questions derived from 52 CSV files. Building on top of our agent framework, we develop a specialized agent, DAAgent, which surpasses GPT-3.5 by 3.9% on DABench.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-10T19:04:00Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.