DSAgentBench: Can Agents Automate End-to-End Data-Science Workflows in Real Computer Environments?

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.10366v1
• Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2026 01:45:56 GMT
• Title: DSAgentBench: Can Agents Automate End-to-End Data-Science Workflows in Real Computer Environments?
• Abstract summary: We introduce DSAgentBench, the first benchmark to evaluate whether agents can automate full data-science inside real computer environments.<n>Our experiments show that even the strongest agent, Claude-4.6-Sonnet, achieves only 56.70% task success.<n>These results reveal a substantial capability gap between current agentic systems and real data-science.
• Score: 40.322111941653134
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Real-world data science involves long-horizon workflows that span data wrangling, exploration, modeling, visualization, and validation, and require coordinated use of tools such as notebooks, IDEs, terminals, browsers, and databases within real operating environments. Yet existing benchmarks lack real-computer interaction and do not evaluate whether agents can execute complete end-to-end data-science workflows in realistic computing environments, failing to capture the multi-stage, multi-tool nature of data-science practice. We introduce DSAgentBench, the first benchmark to evaluate whether agents can automate full data-science workflows inside real computer environments. DSAgentBench contains 275 diverse tasks covering the entire data-science life-cycle, reflecting the complexity and tool coordination required in practice. Each task requires grounding decisions in intermediate outputs and coordinated tool use, and includes a deterministic evaluator that verifies analytical correctness, visual outputs, and model performance rather than code-only execution. Our extensive experiments with 15 closed- and open-source models show that even the strongest agent, Claude-4.6-Sonnet, achieves only 56.70% task success, while all open-source agents remain below 1%, frequently failing at tool orchestration, OS grounding, and multi-step reasoning. These results reveal a substantial capability gap between current agentic systems and real data-science workflows, positioning DSAgentBench as a foundation for developing grounded, verifiable, autonomous data-science agents. We release DSAgentBench at https://github.com/vis-nlp/DSAgentBench.

Related papers

• DuMateBench: Evaluating Autonomous Agents in Complex Real-World Workflows [69.12339622053588]
  We introduce DuMateBench, a real-session benchmark reconstructed from anonymized and privacy-screened user sessions.<n>The resulting benchmark comprises 200 tasks spanning 8 broad scenarios and 17 fine-grained capability categories.<n>We execute these tasks in isolated Docker containers injected with three forms of real-world environmental complexity: Insufficient, Unstable, and Noisy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-27T02:36:23Z)
• AgenticDataBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Data Agents [26.292243502468335]
  Large language model (MLL) data agents have emerged as a promising solution to automate data science.<n>We propose AgenticData, a comprehensive benchmark featuring realistic tasks spanning diverse domains with fine-grained granularity.<n>This enables evaluations to capture the diversity and complexity of data science and the detailed performance of agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-02T03:18:59Z)
• AgentHijack: Benchmarking Computer Use Agent Robustness to Common Environment Corruptions [78.49000936275773]
  We introduce AgentHijack, a benchmark designed to evaluate the robustness of computer-use agents under common corruptions.<n>We evaluate a variety of desktop tasks that utilize MLLM-based agents and discover that even minor instances of corruption can result in substantial performance degradation.<n>We propose AgentHijack-Agent, a framework that integrates an action generator with enhanced grounding capabilities and an onlooker responsible for behavior summarization and environment checking.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-25T11:09:22Z)
• Agent World Model: Infinity Synthetic Environments for Agentic Reinforcement Learning [62.499592503950026]
  Large language model (LLM) have empowered autonomous agents to perform complex tasks that require multi-turn interactions with tools and environments.<n>We propose Agent World Model (AWM), a fully synthetic environment generation pipeline.<n>We scale to 1,000 environments covering everyday scenarios, in which agents can interact with rich toolsets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-10T18:55:41Z)
• AgentSkiller: Scaling Generalist Agent Intelligence through Semantically Integrated Cross-Domain Data Synthesis [30.512393568258105]
  Large Language Model agents demonstrate potential in solving real-world problems via tools, yet generalist intelligence is bottlenecked by scarce high-quality, long-horizon data.<n>We propose AgentSkiller, a fully automated framework synthesizing multi-turn interaction data across realistic, semantically linked domains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-10T03:21:42Z)
• DatawiseAgent: A Notebook-Centric LLM Agent Framework for Adaptive and Robust Data Science Automation [10.390461679868197]
  We introduce DatawiseAgent, a notebook-centric large language model (LLM) agent framework for adaptive and robust data science automation.<n>Inspired by how human data scientists work in computational notebooks, DatawiseAgent introduces a unified interaction representation and a multi-stage architecture.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-10T08:32:33Z)
• TheAgentCompany: Benchmarking LLM Agents on Consequential Real World Tasks [55.03911355902567]
  We introduce TheAgentCompany, a benchmark for evaluating AI agents that interact with the world in similar ways to those of a digital worker.<n>We find that the most competitive agent can complete 30% of tasks autonomously.<n>This paints a nuanced picture on task automation with simulating LM agents in a setting a real workplace.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-18T18:55:40Z)
• Spider2-V: How Far Are Multimodal Agents From Automating Data Science and Engineering Workflows? [73.81908518992161]
  We introduce Spider2-V, the first multimodal agent benchmark focusing on professional data science and engineering. Spider2-V features real-world tasks in authentic computer environments and incorporating 20 enterprise-level professional applications. These tasks evaluate the ability of a multimodal agent to perform data-related tasks by writing code and managing the GUI in enterprise data software systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-15T17:54:37Z)
• MLAgentBench: Evaluating Language Agents on Machine Learning Experimentation [96.71370747681078]
  We introduce MLAgentBench, a suite of 13 tasks ranging from improving model performance on CIFAR-10 to recent research problems like BabyLM. For each task, an agent can perform actions like reading/writing files, executing code, and inspecting outputs. We benchmark agents based on Claude v1.0, Claude v2.1, Claude v3 Opus, GPT-4, GPT-4-turbo, Gemini-Pro, and Mixtral and find that a Claude v3 Opus agent is the best in terms of success rate.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-05T04:06:12Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.