The Biosecurity Blind Spot: Systematic Dual-use Detection in Open Science Infrastructure

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.28843v1
• Date: Sun, 10 May 2026 16:17:41 GMT
• Title: The Biosecurity Blind Spot: Systematic Dual-use Detection in Open Science Infrastructure
• Abstract summary: We present the first systematic analysis of dual-use research of concern (DURC) content on open preprint servers.<n>Our analysis reveals that dual-use-adjacent knowledge is routinely present in openly accessible titles and abstracts.<n>We argue that institutional review processes, funding requirements, and preprint platform policies must evolve to incorporate proactive, metadata-level monitoring.
• Score: 0.6124773188525718
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: AI is transforming life sciences research at unprecedented speed, accelerating discovery across protein structure prediction, genome modeling, and drug development (Jumper et al., 2021; Mak et al., 2024). Yet this rapid advancement, coupled with the open science movement, introduces significant dual-use research concerns that have received limited empirical scrutiny. Here we present the first systematic analysis of dual-use research of concern (DURC) content on open preprint servers. We screened ~52,000 bioRxiv preprints (2024-2025) using a hybrid pipeline of lexical filtering and large language model (LLM) evaluation, scoring metadata across nine DURC, three PEPP, and five governance categories aligned with U.S. and Australia Group oversight frameworks. Our analysis reveals that dual-use-adjacent knowledge is routinely present in openly accessible titles and abstracts, often exceeding established risk thresholds even in studies with legitimate public health objectives. While this mapping captures surface-level information diffusion, it does not measure operational capability, downstream misuse potential, or the substantial technical and biosafety barriers that constrain harmful application. We argue that institutional review processes, funding requirements, and preprint platform policies must evolve to incorporate proactive, metadata-level monitoring without compromising scientific transparency. Ultimately, harmonizing controlled-access mechanisms for high-risk methodologies with open summaries of scientific contributions offers a pragmatic framework for governing AI-accelerated biology at scale.

Related papers

• From Inference to Prediction: How Machine Learning is Reconfiguring Science (1990-2025) [0.669087470775851]
  We analyze 4.9 million scientific publications from OpenAlex (1990-2025)<n>We show a core-periphery structure with physical sciences forming the methodological core and health sciences representing the primary growth area.<n>We observe the displacement of inference-oriented techniques by predictive architectures in domains that have traditionally prioritized interpretability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-19T00:06:50Z)
• SciResearcher: Scaling Deep Research Agents for Frontier Scientific Reasoning [54.194672921128785]
  We introduce SciResearcher, a fully automated agentic framework for frontier-science data construction.<n>SciResearcher synthesizes diverse conceptual and computational tasks grounded in academic evidence.<n>We develop SciResearcher-8B, an agent foundation model that achieves 19.46% on the HLE-Bio/Chem-Gold benchmark.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-02T15:26:45Z)
• Can Large Language Models Derive New Knowledge? A Dynamic Benchmark for Biological Knowledge Discovery [81.03797680309154]
  DBench-Bio is a dynamic and fully automated benchmark to evaluate AI's biological knowledge discovery ability.<n>We instantiate this pipeline to construct a monthly-updated benchmark covering 12 biomedical sub-domains.<n>Our work provides the first dynamic, automatic framework for assessing the new knowledge discovery capabilities of AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-10T05:47:22Z)
• AstaBench: Rigorous Benchmarking of AI Agents with a Scientific Research Suite [75.58737079136942]
  We present AstaBench, a suite that provides the first holistic measure of agentic ability to perform scientific research.<n>Our suite comes with the first scientific research environment with production-grade search tools.<n>Our evaluation of 57 agents across 22 agent classes reveals several interesting findings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-24T17:10:26Z)
• A Survey of Scientific Large Language Models: From Data Foundations to Agent Frontiers [251.23085679210206]
  Scientific Large Language Models (Sci-LLMs) are transforming how knowledge is represented, integrated, and applied in scientific research.<n>This survey reframes the development of Sci-LLMs as a co-evolution between models and their underlying data substrate.<n>We formulate a unified taxonomy of scientific data and a hierarchical model of scientific knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-28T18:30:52Z)
• What are the limits to biomedical research acceleration through general-purpose AI? [2.31014638945732]
  General-purpose artificial intelligence (GPAI) is widely expected to accelerate scientific discovery.<n>Our scoping literature review indicates that current GPAI could deliver a speed increase of around 2x, whereas future GPAI could facilitate strong acceleration of up to 25x.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-13T10:54:11Z)
• Medical Reasoning in the Era of LLMs: A Systematic Review of Enhancement Techniques and Applications [59.721265428780946]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) in medicine have enabled impressive capabilities, yet a critical gap remains in their ability to perform systematic, transparent, and verifiable reasoning.<n>This paper provides the first systematic review of this emerging field.<n>We propose a taxonomy of reasoning enhancement techniques, categorized into training-time strategies and test-time mechanisms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-01T14:41:31Z)
• WithdrarXiv: A Large-Scale Dataset for Retraction Study [33.782357627001154]
  We present WithdrarXiv, the first large-scale dataset of withdrawn papers from arXiv.<n>We develop a comprehensive taxonomy of retraction reasons, identifying 10 distinct categories ranging from critical errors to policy violations.<n>We demonstrate a simple yet highly accurate zero-shot automatic categorization of retraction reasons, achieving a weighted average F1-score of 0.96.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-04T23:36:23Z)
• SoK: Evaluations in Industrial Intrusion Detection Research [8.356036431147889]
  Industrial intrusion detection systems strive to timely uncover even the most sophisticated breaches. Due to its criticality for society, this fast-growing field attracts researchers from diverse backgrounds. Our analysis of 609 publications shows that the rapid growth of this research field has positive and negative consequences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-06T07:49:58Z)
• ProBio: A Protocol-guided Multimodal Dataset for Molecular Biology Lab [67.24684071577211]
  The challenge of replicating research results has posed a significant impediment to the field of molecular biology. We first curate a comprehensive multimodal dataset, named ProBio, as an initial step towards this objective. Next, we devise two challenging benchmarks, transparent solution tracking and multimodal action recognition, to emphasize the unique characteristics and difficulties associated with activity understanding in BioLab settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-01T14:44:01Z)
• Accelerating COVID-19 research with graph mining and transformer-based learning [2.493740042317776]
  We present an automated general purpose hypothesis generation systems AGATHA-C and AGATHA-GP for COVID-19 research. Both systems achieve high-quality predictions across domains (in some domains up to 0.97% ROC AUC) in fast computational time. We show that the systems are able to discover on-going research findings such as the relationship between COVID-19 and oxytocin hormone.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-10T15:11:36Z)
• AGATHA: Automatic Graph-mining And Transformer based Hypothesis generation Approach [1.7954335118363964]
  We present a hypothesis generation system that can introduce data-driven insights earlier in the discovery process. AGATHA prioritizes plausible term-pairs among entity sets, allowing us to recommend new research directions. This system achieves best-in-class performance on an established benchmark.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-13T17:06:47Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.