Paper Agents, Paper Gains: An Empirical Analysis of DeFi Investment Agents

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.29174v1
• Date: Wed, 27 May 2026 23:21:42 GMT
• Title: Paper Agents, Paper Gains: An Empirical Analysis of DeFi Investment Agents
• Abstract summary: DeFi investment agents, systems that use AI for autonomous on-chain trading, have attained over USD 3 billion in combined token valuations since late 2024.<n>We survey over 1,900 AI-tagged crypto projects, filter to investment-focused agents, and curate 10 representative projects spanning strategy and observability dimensions.
• Score: 1.2615560815195466
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: DeFi investment agents, systems that use AI for autonomous on-chain trading, have attained over USD 3 billion in combined token valuations since late 2024. We survey over 1,900 AI-tagged crypto projects, filter to investment-focused agents, and curate 10 representative projects spanning strategy and observability dimensions. We then conduct a deep-dive architectural analysis of two prominent agent frameworks, ElizaOS and Virtuals Protocol, and a quantitative on-chain performance analysis of 11 Solana-based agent treasuries with publicly attributable trading activity, covering 925,323 token holders. We find that current deployments remain early and heterogeneous: (1) in our sample, many projects do not yet provide clear evidence of autonomous trade execution, and developer interviews suggest that many visible deployments remain basic API integrations; (2) agent treasuries retain over USD 30M in paper gains while token holders collectively lost USD 191.7M, with the top 1% of wallets capturing 81.4% of all gains (USD 1.81B); (3) token valuations are weakly connected to treasury fundamentals, with market-cap-to-AUM ratios exceeding 10,000x versus below 1x for established DeFi protocols; and (4) aggregate user gains peaked at USD 2.4B before declining to net losses, with median returns negative on every platform and tokens declining 93% on average from all-time highs. We interpret these outcomes as characteristic of a permissionless, first-generation market in which open infrastructure enables rapid experimentation but also allows naive or speculative agents to launch before robust standards for autonomy, performance, and stakeholder alignment emerge. We therefore propose a maturity framework along three dimensions: autonomous execution, risk-adjusted profitability, and stakeholder alignment, to characterize the gap between current deployments and future investment-grade agent systems.

Related papers

• Poisoning Agentic Alpha: Adversarial Vulnerabilities Across Roles and Architectures in Multi-Agent Trading Systems [103.90831279037094]
  LLM-based multi-agent trading systems are moving rapidly from research prototypes to live deployments that control real assets.<n>A corrupted signal can propagate to the final decision and translate into realized financial loss.<n>We present the first systematic empirical study in the financial domain to characterize how an adversarial signal enters a multi-agent trading system.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-25T05:07:37Z)
• Fin-Analyst at FinMMEval 2026 Task 3: A Live Hybrid Trading Agent with LLM Specialists and Rule-Based Signals [1.9607607228028596]
  Fin-Analyst is a hybrid agent for FinMMEval 2026 Task 3: an eight-specialist LLM pipeline over news, SEC filings, fundamentals, analyst forecasts, technical indicators, and social sentiment, aggregated by a Meta-Agent for Tesla (TSLA)<n>On the final official leaderboard (accessed 2026-07-05), Fin-Analyst ranks first of all agents on TSLA with a +13.51% return, +28.33 points over Buy-and-Hold (Sharpe 4.10, 88% win rate)<n>Relative to the interim performance, the asset ranking reversed, indicating that short live windows yield volatility-sensitive rankings
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-14T00:27:07Z)
• IPO Finance Agent: Benchmark of LLM Financial Analysts Beyond Finance Agent v2, with Automated Rubric Generation, on the SpaceX (SPCX) IPO [0.0]
  Finance Agent v2 (by Vals AI) has emerged as the reference benchmark for evaluating finance language models.<n>We introduce IPO Finance Agent, which extends the Finance Agent framework along two directions: task domain and retrieval architecture.<n>Best-performing evaluated model, Zhipu GLM-5.2, reaches 79.8% accuracy, and the most cost-efficient model on the resulting frontier, Xiaomi MiMo-2.5 Pro, reaches slightly lower accuracy (77.2%) at 0.05 USD per query.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-22T08:42:19Z)
• STEP3-VL-10B Technical Report [115.89015065130127]
  STEP3-VL-10B is a lightweight foundation model designed to redefine the trade-off between compact efficiency and frontier-level multimodal intelligence.<n>We implement Parallel Coordinated Reasoning (PaCoRe) to scale test-time compute, allocating resources to scalable perceptual reasoning.<n>It records 92.2% on MMBench and 80.11% on MMMU, while excelling in complex reasoning with 94.43% on AIME2025 and 75.95% on MathVision.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-14T17:58:24Z)
• Comparing AI Agents to Cybersecurity Professionals in Real-World Penetration Testing [83.48116811975787]
  We present the first comprehensive evaluation of AI agents against human cybersecurity professionals.<n>We evaluate ten cybersecurity professionals alongside six existing AI agents and ARTEMIS, our new agent scaffold.<n>ARTEMIS placed second overall, discovering 9 valid vulnerabilities with an 82% valid submission rate.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-10T18:12:29Z)
• When Agents Trade: Live Multi-Market Trading Benchmark for LLM Agents [74.55061622246824]
  Agent Market Arena (AMA) is the first lifelong, real-time benchmark for evaluating Large Language Model (LLM)-based trading agents.<n>AMA integrates verified trading data, expert-checked news, and diverse agent architectures within a unified trading framework.<n>It evaluates agents across GPT-4o, GPT-4.1, Claude-3.5-haiku, Claude-sonnet-4, and Gemini-2.0-flash.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-13T17:54:09Z)
• Security Challenges in AI Agent Deployment: Insights from a Large Scale Public Competition [101.86739402748995]
  We run the largest public red-teaming competition to date, targeting 22 frontier AI agents across 44 realistic deployment scenarios.<n>We build the Agent Red Teaming benchmark and evaluate it across 19 state-of-the-art models.<n>Our findings highlight critical and persistent vulnerabilities in today's AI agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-28T05:13:04Z)
• AI Agent Architecture for Decentralized Trading of Alternative Assets [2.8195433571821162]
  GoldMine OS is a research oriented architecture that employs multiple specialized AI agents to automate and secure the tokenization and exchange of physical gold into a blockchain based stablecoin ("OZ")<n>We describe four cooperative agents (Compliance, Token Issuance, Market Making, and Risk Control) and a coordinating core, and evaluate the system through simulation and a controlled pilot deployment.<n>In experiments the prototype delivers on demand token issuance in under 1.2 s, more than 100 times faster than manual.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-15T09:11:19Z)
• Building crypto portfolios with agentic AI [46.348283638884425]
  The rapid growth of crypto markets has opened new opportunities for investors, but at the same time exposed them to high volatility.<n>This paper presents a practical application of a multi-agent system designed to autonomously construct and evaluate crypto-asset allocations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-11T18:03:51Z)
• AI Agent Smart Contract Exploit Generation [8.69235891205913]
  A1 is an agentic system that transforms any Large Language Models into an end-to-end exploit generator.<n>A1 provides agents with six domain-specific tools for autonomous vulnerability discovery.<n>We show that A1 extracts up to $8.59 million per exploit and $9.33 million total.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-08T00:45:26Z)
• HedgeAgents: A Balanced-aware Multi-agent Financial Trading System [20.48571388047213]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) and Agent-based models exhibit promising potential in real-time market analysis and trading decisions.<n>They still experience a significant -20% loss when confronted with rapid declines or frequent fluctuations.<n>This paper introduces an innovative multi-agent system, HedgeAgents, aimed at bolstering system via hedging robustness'' strategies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-17T04:13:19Z)
• Quantifying A Firm's AI Engagement: Constructing Objective, Data-Driven, AI Stock Indices Using 10-K Filings [0.0]
  This paper proposes a new, objective, data-driven approach using natural language processing (NLP) techniques to classify AI stocks.<n>We analyze annual 10-K filings from 3,395 NASDAQ-listed firms between 2011 and 2023.<n>Using these metrics, we construct four AI stock indices-the Equally Weighted AI Index (AII), the Size-Weighted AI Index (SAII), and two Time-Discounted AI Indices (TAII05 and TAII5X)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-03T11:27:49Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.