VLAConf: Calibrated Task-Success Confidence for Vision-Language-Action Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.29605v1
• Date: Thu, 28 May 2026 08:42:12 GMT
• Title: VLAConf: Calibrated Task-Success Confidence for Vision-Language-Action Models
• Abstract summary: We propose VLAConf, a one-class discriminative confidence framework for Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models.<n>By leveraging frozen pretrained VLA internal representations, VLAConf directly estimates step-wise anomaly scores in a single forward pass.<n>Experiments on the LIBERO benchmark demonstrate that VLAConf significantly improves the quality of the confidence signal constructed for post-hoc calibration.
• Score: 7.329348634749636
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Confidence estimation for Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models is essential for robots to perform manipulation tasks in the open world, providing crucial signals for risk-sensitive decision-making and failure anticipation. Existing confidence estimation methods typically rely on ensemble-based paradigms or action-token probabilities to predict the likelihood of task success. However, they still encounter challenges in computational efficiency and cross-architecture generalizability. These methods usually require repeated sampling, leading to inference inefficiency, and are restricted to VLA models with discrete action outputs, making them difficult to apply to continuous action spaces. To address this issue, we propose VLAConf, a one-class discriminative confidence framework. By leveraging frozen pretrained VLA internal representations, VLAConf directly estimates step-wise anomaly scores in a single forward pass using a lightweight confidence head, thereby eliminating the overhead of exhaustive resampling. We additionally use step-conditioned modeling to encode rollout-phase information along the manipulation trajectory. Experiments on the LIBERO benchmark demonstrate that VLAConf significantly improves the quality of the confidence signal constructed for post-hoc calibration, outperforming existing baselines by a large margin in inference efficiency. The effectiveness of VLAConf is further validated in real-robot experiments. To access the source code and supplementary videos, visit https://sites.google.com/view/vlaconf.

Related papers

• dVLA-RL: Reinforcement Learning over Denoising Trajectories for Discrete Diffusion Vision-Language-Action Models [49.497309561043004]
  We propose textbfdVLA-RL, shifting the learning objective from the marginal action probability to the joint probability of the sampled generation path.<n>Our approach achieves a success rate of textbf99.7% on LIBERO.<n>It also establishes strong VLA-based results on RoboTwin 2.0 by delivering a textbf30.6% improvement over the SFT baseline.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-22T17:19:03Z)
• Uncertainty Quantification for Flow-Based Vision-Language-Action Models [33.28454469934064]
  Vision-language-action models (VLAs) combine vision-language backbones with expressive generative action heads trained via flow matching on large-scale robotic datasets.<n>Despite their strong empirical performance in robotic manipulation, VLAs lack mechanisms to quantify confidence in their predictions and to detect when their actions may be unreliable.<n>We propose SAVE, a framework for uncertainty-guided active fine-tuning that reduces the number of costly expert demonstrations required to adapt VLAs to new tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-16T15:19:09Z)
• ReconVLA: An Uncertainty-Guided and Failure-Aware Vision-Language-Action Framework for Robotic Control [7.018221049093963]
  Vision-language-action (VLA) models have emerged as generalist robotic controllers capable of mapping visual observations and natural language instructions to continuous action sequences.<n>We introduce ReconVLA, a reliable conformal model that produces uncertainty-guided and failure-aware control signals.<n>Our results show that conformalized action predictions consistently improve failure anticipation, reduce catastrophic errors, and provide a calibrated measure of confidence without retraining or modifying the underlying VLA.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-17T20:20:43Z)
• Reshaping Action Error Distributions for Reliable Vision-Language-Action Models [69.38615670891038]
  In robotic manipulation, vision-language-action (VLA) models have emerged as a promising paradigm for learning generalizable and scalable robot policies.<n>We focus on continuous-action VLA models and move beyond conventional MSE-based regression by reshaping action error distributions during training.<n>We evaluate our approaches across standard, few-shot, and noisy settings on multiple representative VLA architectures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-04T05:37:09Z)
• Steering Vision-Language-Action Models as Anti-Exploration: A Test-Time Scaling Approach [78.4812458793128]
  We propose textbfTACO, a test-time-scaling framework that applies a lightweight pseudo-count estimator as a high-fidelity verifier of action chunks.<n>Our method resembles the classical anti-exploration principle in offline reinforcement learning (RL), and being gradient-free, it incurs significant computational benefits.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-02T14:42:54Z)
• Dual-Stream Diffusion for World-Model Augmented Vision-Language-Action Model [62.889356203346985]
  We propose DUal-STream diffusion (DUST), a world-model augmented VLA framework that handles the modality conflict.<n>DUST achieves up to 6% gains over a standard VLA baseline and implicit world-modeling methods.<n>On real-world tasks with the Franka Research 3, DUST outperforms baselines in success rate by 13%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-31T16:32:12Z)
• BrowseConf: Confidence-Guided Test-Time Scaling for Web Agents [58.05949210993854]
  We investigate whether search agents have the ability to communicate their own confidence through verbalized confidence scores after long sequences of actions.<n>We propose Test-Time Scaling (TTS) methods that use confidence scores to determine answer quality, encourage the model to try again until reaching a satisfactory confidence level.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-27T15:58:51Z)
• Mind the Generation Process: Fine-Grained Confidence Estimation During LLM Generation [63.49409574310576]
  Large language models (LLMs) exhibit overconfidence, assigning high confidence scores to incorrect predictions.<n>We introduce FineCE, a novel confidence estimation method that delivers accurate, fine-grained confidence scores during text generation.<n>Our code and all baselines used in the paper are available on GitHub.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-16T13:29:35Z)
• Confidence Calibration in Vision-Language-Action Models [2.230383995796716]
  Trustworthy robot behavior requires high levels of task success and reliably quantify how likely it is to succeed.<n>We present the first systematic study of confidence calibration in vision-language-action (VLA) foundation models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-23T10:26:10Z)
• Data-Driven Calibration of Prediction Sets in Large Vision-Language Models Based on Inductive Conformal Prediction [0.0]
  We propose a model-agnostic uncertainty quantification method that integrates dynamic threshold calibration and cross-modal consistency verification.<n>We show that the framework achieves stable performance across varying calibration-to-test split ratios, underscoring its robustness for real-world deployment in healthcare, autonomous systems, and other safety-sensitive domains.<n>This work bridges the gap between theoretical reliability and practical applicability in multi-modal AI systems, offering a scalable solution for hallucination detection and uncertainty-aware decision-making.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-24T15:39:46Z)
• Object-Level Verbalized Confidence Calibration in Vision-Language Models via Semantic Perturbation [26.580361841501514]
  Vision-language models (VLMs) excel in various multimodal tasks but frequently suffer from poor calibration.<n>This miscalibration undermines user trust, especially when models confidently provide incorrect or fabricated information.<n>We propose a novel Confidence through Semantic Perturbation (CSP) framework to improve the calibration of verbalized confidence for object-centric queries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-21T04:01:22Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.