Evaluating Cross-lingual Knowledge Consistency in Code-Mixed vis-a-vis Indian Languages using IndicKLAR

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.29637v1
• Date: Thu, 28 May 2026 09:06:59 GMT
• Title: Evaluating Cross-lingual Knowledge Consistency in Code-Mixed vis-a-vis Indian Languages using IndicKLAR
• Abstract summary: We examine how knowledge recall consistency varies across the spectrum of English, code-mixed, and native Indian language inputs.<n>We find that the native-language accuracy gap to English can reach $sim$0.50, while code-mixed inputs close most of it.<n>Motivated by this, we evaluate several prompting strategies that vary in how language conversion is exposed.
• Score: 11.507193494503754
• License: http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
• Abstract: Large language models recall knowledge reliably in English but often fail on the same query posed in a lower-resourced language -- a crosslingual consistency gap that remains underexplored for Indian languages and their code-mixed counterparts. To study this gap, we introduce IndiKLAR, an Indic extension of the KLAR-CLC benchmark covering 18 of the 22 scheduled Indian languages and pairing them with code-mixed variants for 11 widely used language pairs, with native-speaker verification of both monolingual and code-mixed variants for these 11 settings. This three-way alignment offers a unique opportunity to examine how knowledge recall consistency varies across the spectrum of English, code-mixed, and native Indian language inputs. Evaluating across nine open-weight models, we find that the native-language accuracy gap to English can reach $\sim$0.50, while code-mixed inputs close most of it -- bringing performance within $\sim$0.05 of English without any model-level intervention. Motivated by this, we evaluate several prompting strategies that vary in how language conversion is exposed, including a two-stage translate-then-answer setup, a one-stage joint translation-and-answer prompt, and Translate-in-Thought (TinT) -- a single-step strategy in which the model converts the input internally and emits only the final answer. Across the performance trajectory native $\rightarrow$ code-mixed $\rightarrow$ English, we identify a consistent flip point -- the boundary between incorrect and correct prediction -- that lies between the native and code-mixed settings. Interestingly, this holds whether the trajectory is induced by the input surface form or by the model's internal conversion process.

Related papers

• Evaluation of forced alignment of code-mixed speech: the case of Hindi-English [5.706697761527132]
  We evaluate forced alignment of Hindi-English code-mixed speech using the Montreal Forced Aligner.<n>We address two problems: free variation involving native vs non-native pairs and phonemic boundary detection for mid-utterance English words.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-28T11:08:05Z)
• Neither Here Nor There: Cross-Lingual Representation Dynamics of Code-Mixed Text in Multilingual Encoders [0.9523331544264052]
  We construct a unified trilingual corpus of parallel English, Hindi, and Romanized code-mixed sentences.<n>We find that while standard models align English and Hindi well, code-mixed inputs remain loosely connected to either language.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-20T09:02:38Z)
• One Instruction Does Not Fit All: How Well Do Embeddings Align Personas and Instructions in Low-Resource Indian Languages? [1.071318785217926]
  We present a benchmark spanning 12 Indian languages and four evaluation tasks.<n>E5-Large-Instruct achieves the highest Recall@1 of 27.4% on monolingual retrieval and 20.7% on cross-lingual transfer.<n>For classification, LaBSE attains 75.3% AUROC with strong calibration.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-15T09:10:14Z)
• Investigating and Scaling up Code-Switching for Multilingual Language Model Pre-Training [58.696660064190475]
  We find that the existence of code-switching, alternating between different languages within a context, is key to multilingual capabilities.<n>To better explore the power of code-switching for language alignment during pre-training, we investigate the strategy of synthetic code-switching.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-02T15:09:58Z)
• Prompt Engineering Using GPT for Word-Level Code-Mixed Language Identification in Low-Resource Dravidian Languages [0.0]
  In multilingual societies like India, text often exhibits code-mixing, blending local languages with English at different linguistic levels.<n>This paper introduces a prompt based method for a shared task aimed at addressing word-level LI challenges in Dravidian languages.<n>In this work, we leveraged GPT-3.5 Turbo to understand whether the large language models is able to correctly classify words into correct categories.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-06T16:20:37Z)
• Streaming Bilingual End-to-End ASR model using Attention over Multiple Softmax [6.386371634323785]
  We propose a novel bilingual end-to-end (E2E) modeling approach, where a single neural model can recognize both languages. The proposed model has shared encoder and prediction networks, with language-specific joint networks that are combined via a self-attention mechanism.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-22T01:44:42Z)
• Reducing language context confusion for end-to-end code-switching automatic speech recognition [50.89821865949395]
  We propose a language-related attention mechanism to reduce multilingual context confusion for the E2E code-switching ASR model. By calculating the respective attention of multiple languages, our method can efficiently transfer language knowledge from rich monolingual data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-28T14:39:29Z)
• Call Larisa Ivanovna: Code-Switching Fools Multilingual NLU Models [1.827510863075184]
  Novel benchmarks for multilingual natural language understanding (NLU) include monolingual sentences in several languages, annotated with intents and slots. Existing benchmarks lack of code-switched utterances, which are difficult to gather and label due to complexity in the grammatical structure. Our work adopts recognized methods to generate plausible and naturally-sounding code-switched utterances and uses them to create a synthetic code-switched test set.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-29T11:15:00Z)
• VECO: Variable and Flexible Cross-lingual Pre-training for Language Understanding and Generation [77.82373082024934]
  We plug a cross-attention module into the Transformer encoder to explicitly build the interdependence between languages. It can effectively avoid the degeneration of predicting masked words only conditioned on the context in its own language. The proposed cross-lingual model delivers new state-of-the-art results on various cross-lingual understanding tasks of the XTREME benchmark.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-30T03:41:38Z)
• Explicit Alignment Objectives for Multilingual Bidirectional Encoders [111.65322283420805]
  We present a new method for learning multilingual encoders, AMBER (Aligned Multilingual Bi-directional EncodeR) AMBER is trained on additional parallel data using two explicit alignment objectives that align the multilingual representations at different granularities. Experimental results show that AMBER obtains gains of up to 1.1 average F1 score on sequence tagging and up to 27.3 average accuracy on retrieval over the XLMR-large model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-15T18:34:13Z)
• FILTER: An Enhanced Fusion Method for Cross-lingual Language Understanding [85.29270319872597]
  We propose an enhanced fusion method that takes cross-lingual data as input for XLM finetuning. During inference, the model makes predictions based on the text input in the target language and its translation in the source language. To tackle this issue, we propose an additional KL-divergence self-teaching loss for model training, based on auto-generated soft pseudo-labels for translated text in the target language.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-10T22:42:15Z)
• Inducing Language-Agnostic Multilingual Representations [61.97381112847459]
  Cross-lingual representations have the potential to make NLP techniques available to the vast majority of languages in the world. We examine three approaches for this: (i) re-aligning the vector spaces of target languages to a pivot source language; (ii) removing language-specific means and variances, which yields better discriminativeness of embeddings as a by-product; and (iii) increasing input similarity across languages by removing morphological contractions and sentence reordering.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-20T17:58:56Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.