Data filtering methods for training language models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.29807v1
• Date: Thu, 28 May 2026 11:52:59 GMT
• Title: Data filtering methods for training language models
• Abstract summary: Two automatic label error detection methods are compared.<n>On large corpora with low noise levels, filtering does not improve performance.<n>On small datasets with high noise, Confident Learning achieves a significant F1-macro improvement.
• Score: 0.12891210250935145
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Data quality is a critical factor in the effectiveness of machine learning models. Label errors, present even in widely used benchmarks, introduce noise into training data and reduce model generalization. In this work, we conduct a comparative analysis of two automatic label error detection methods - Confident Learning and Dataset Cartography - on three Russian text classification corpora of varying size, number of classes, and domain: ru_emotion_e-culture (49,123 examples, emotion classification), RuCoLA (8,524 examples, linguistic acceptability), and TERRa (2,337 examples, textual entailment recognition). We use the pre-trained rubert-base-cased model fine-tuned on each corpus. To verify the meaningfulness of filtering, we conduct control experiments with random removal of an equivalent number of examples. Results show that the effectiveness of both methods depends strongly on dataset characteristics: on large corpora with low noise levels, filtering does not improve performance, while on small datasets with high noise, Confident Learning achieves a significant F1-macro improvement. Dataset Cartography demonstrates more conservative behavior, removing fewer examples. Across all corpora, targeted removal by both methods outperforms random removal, confirming the meaningfulness of the approaches.

Related papers

• Understanding Data Influence with Differential Approximation [63.817689230826595]
  We introduce a new formulation to approximate a sample's influence by accumulating the differences in influence between consecutive learning steps, which we term Diff-In.<n>By employing second-order approximations, we approximate these difference terms with high accuracy while eliminating the need for model convexity required by existing methods.<n>Our theoretical analysis demonstrates that Diff-In achieves significantly lower approximation error compared to existing influence estimators.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-20T11:59:32Z)
• A Closer Look at Benchmarking Self-Supervised Pre-training with Image Classification [51.35500308126506]
  Self-supervised learning (SSL) is a machine learning approach where the data itself provides supervision, eliminating the need for external labels. We study how classification-based evaluation protocols for SSL correlate and how well they predict downstream performance on different dataset types.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-16T23:17:36Z)
• Co-training for Low Resource Scientific Natural Language Inference [65.37685198688538]
  We propose a novel co-training method that assigns weights based on the training dynamics of the classifiers to the distantly supervised labels. By assigning importance weights instead of filtering out examples based on an arbitrary threshold on the predicted confidence, we maximize the usage of automatically labeled data. The proposed method obtains an improvement of 1.5% in Macro F1 over the distant supervision baseline, and substantial improvements over several other strong SSL baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-20T18:35:47Z)
• Influence Scores at Scale for Efficient Language Data Sampling [3.072340427031969]
  "influence scores" are used to identify important subsets of data. In this paper, we explore the applicability of influence scores in language classification tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-27T20:19:22Z)
• Enhancing Sentiment Analysis Results through Outlier Detection Optimization [0.5439020425819]
  This study investigates the potential of identifying and addressing outliers in text data with subjective labels. We utilize the Deep SVDD algorithm, a one-class classification method, to detect outliers in nine text-based emotion and sentiment analysis datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-25T18:20:43Z)
• Late Stopping: Avoiding Confidently Learning from Mislabeled Examples [61.00103151680946]
  We propose a new framework, Late Stopping, which leverages the intrinsic robust learning ability of DNNs through a prolonged training process. We empirically observe that mislabeled and clean examples exhibit differences in the number of epochs required for them to be consistently and correctly classified. Experimental results on benchmark-simulated and real-world noisy datasets demonstrate that the proposed method outperforms state-of-the-art counterparts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-26T12:43:25Z)
• Learning with Noisy Labels by Adaptive Gradient-Based Outlier Removal [4.71154003227418]
  We propose AGRA: a new method for learning with noisy labels by using Adaptive GRAdient-based outlier removal. By comparing the aggregated gradient of a batch of samples and an individual example gradient, our method dynamically decides whether a corresponding example is helpful for the model. Extensive evaluation on several datasets demonstrates AGRA's effectiveness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-07T15:10:01Z)
• Learning to Detect Noisy Labels Using Model-Based Features [16.681748918518075]
  We propose Selection-Enhanced Noisy label Training (SENT) SENT does not rely on meta learning while having the flexibility of being data-driven. It improves performance over strong baselines under the settings of self-training and label corruption.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-28T10:12:13Z)
• Dash: Semi-Supervised Learning with Dynamic Thresholding [72.74339790209531]
  We propose a semi-supervised learning (SSL) approach that uses unlabeled examples to train models. Our proposed approach, Dash, enjoys its adaptivity in terms of unlabeled data selection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-01T23:52:29Z)
• Bridging the Gap Between Clean Data Training and Real-World Inference for Spoken Language Understanding [76.89426311082927]
  Existing models are trained on clean data, which causes a textitgap between clean data training and real-world inference. We propose a method from the perspective of domain adaptation, by which both high- and low-quality samples are embedding into similar vector space. Experiments on the widely-used dataset, Snips, and large scale in-house dataset (10 million training examples) demonstrate that this method not only outperforms the baseline models on real-world (noisy) corpus but also enhances the robustness, that is, it produces high-quality results under a noisy environment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-13T17:54:33Z)
• Learning with Out-of-Distribution Data for Audio Classification [60.48251022280506]
  We show that detecting and relabelling certain OOD instances, rather than discarding them, can have a positive effect on learning. The proposed method is shown to improve the performance of convolutional neural networks by a significant margin.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-11T21:08:06Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.