LexPath: A domain-oriented multi-path framework for legal article retrieval

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.30205v1
• Date: Thu, 28 May 2026 16:43:17 GMT
• Title: LexPath: A domain-oriented multi-path framework for legal article retrieval
• Abstract summary: textscLexPath is a domain-oriented multi-path framework for legal article retrieval.<n>textscLexPath consistently outperforms lexical, dense, hybrid, and adaptive retrieval-augmented generation baselines.
• Score: 8.207321254335524
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Legal article retrieval is critical for building traceable and reliable legal AI systems, where conclusions must be grounded in specific legal articles. However, existing open-domain retrieval methods rely heavily on surface-level lexical or semantic similarity, making it difficult for them to distinguish legally relevant articles from those that are textually similar but legally inapplicable or misaligned with the user's underlying intent. To bridge this gap, we propose \textsc{LexPath}, a domain-oriented multi-path framework comprising a multi-path retrieval module and an intent-aware reranking module. The retrieval module combines two complementary legal-specific paths to collect candidate articles: an IRAC-guided sparse path that expands queries with legally informative keywords, and a structure-guided dense path trained with hard negatives derived from legal hierarchy and citation relations. Then, the reranking module further refines the candidate ranking by incorporating the intent consistency score between queries and legal articles. We evaluate \textsc{LexPath} on two publicly available benchmarks focusing on general-public queries and a self-constructed benchmark targeting domain-professional scenarios. Experimental results demonstrate that \textsc{LexPath} consistently outperforms lexical, dense, hybrid, and adaptive retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) baselines. Ablation studies further verify the effectiveness of each component.

Related papers

• Citation-Closure Retrieval and Per-Rule Attribution for Real-World Regulatory Compliance Question Answering [54.97384993676565]
  We formalize Regulatory Compliance QA with RegOps-Bench, a novel benchmark featuring an Operational Knowledge Graph derived from complex national R&D regulations.<n>RefWalk traverses cross-document citations, fuses multi-view candidates via max-based aggregation, and enforces per-rule attribution to explicitly map claims to sources.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-28T10:38:38Z)
• GrepSeek: Training Search Agents for Direct Corpus Interaction [66.69568141699311]
  GrepSeek is an optimized direct corpus interaction (DCI) search agent that trains a compact search agent to find, filter, and compose evidence from large text corpora.<n>To make DCI practical at scale, we further use a semantics-preserving sharded-parallel execution engine that accelerates shell-based retrieval by up to $7.6times$ while preserving byte-exact equivalence with sequential execution of the shell command.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-28T03:37:33Z)
• Beyond Semantic Similarity: Rethinking Retrieval for Agentic Search via Direct Corpus Interaction [127.64173950476702]
  We study direct corpus interaction (DCI), where an agent searches the raw corpus directly with general-purpose terminal tools.<n>This approach requires no offline indexing and adapts naturally to evolving local corpora.<n>Across IR benchmarks and end-to-end agentic search tasks, this simple setup substantially outperforms strong sparse, dense, and reranking baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-03T19:13:11Z)
• JUÁ -- A Benchmark for Information Retrieval in Brazilian Legal Text Collections [3.6360100966162787]
  Legal information retrieval in Portuguese remains difficult to evaluate systematically because available datasets differ widely in document type, query style, and relevance definition.<n>We present JU, a public benchmark for Brazilian legal retrieval designed to support more reproducible and comparable evaluation across heterogeneous legal collections.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-07T17:10:54Z)
• Beyond Paper-to-Paper: Structured Profiling and Rubric Scoring for Paper-Reviewer Matching [5.731351860196096]
  P2R is a training-free framework that shifts from implicit paper-to-paper matching to explicit profile-based matching.<n>It first performs hybrid retrieval that combines semantic and aspect-level signals to form a high-recall candidate pool.<n>Experiments on NeurIPS, SIGIR, and SciRepEval show that P2R consistently outperforms state-of-the-art baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-07T13:27:40Z)
• MoDora: Tree-Based Semi-Structured Document Analysis System [62.01015188258797]
  Semi-structured documents integrate diverse interleaved data elements arranged in various and often irregular layouts.<n>MoDora is an LLM-powered system for semi-structured document analysis.<n> Experiments show MoDora outperforms baselines by 5.97%-61.07% in accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-26T14:48:49Z)
• Semantically Orthogonal Framework for Citation Classification: Disentangling Intent and Content [0.0]
  SOFT is a Semantically Orthogonal Framework with Two dimensions that explicitly separates citation intent from cited content type.<n>We re-annotate the ACL-ARC dataset using SOFT and release a cross-disciplinary test set sampled from ACT2.<n>Results confirm SOFT's value as a clear, reusable annotation standard, improving clarity, consistency, and generalizability for digital libraries and scholarly communication infrastructures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-08T16:48:36Z)
• Domain-Partitioned Hybrid RAG for Legal Reasoning: Toward Modular and Explainable Legal AI for India [5.022547031373416]
  Legal research in India involves navigating long and heterogeneous documents spanning statutes, constitutional provisions, penal codes, and judicial precedents.<n>Recent retrieval augmented generation (RAG) approaches improve grounding but struggle with multi-hop reasoning.<n>We propose a domain partitioned hybrid RAG and Knowledge Graph architecture designed specifically for Indian legal research.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-23T20:22:39Z)
• LLM-guided Hierarchical Retrieval [54.73080745446999]
  LATTICE is a hierarchical retrieval framework that enables an LLM to reason over and navigate large corpora with logarithmic search complexity.<n>A central challenge in such LLM-guided search is that the model's relevance judgments are noisy, context-dependent, and unaware of the hierarchy.<n>Our framework achieves state-of-the-art zero-shot performance on the reasoning-intensive BRIGHT benchmark.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-15T07:05:17Z)
• Poly-Vector Retrieval: Reference and Content Embeddings for Legal Documents [0.0]
  In legal contexts, users frequently reference norms by their labels or nicknames, rather than by their content.<n>This paper introduces Poly-Retrieval, assigning multiple distinct embeddings to each legal provision.<n>It significantly improves retrieval accuracy for label-centric queries and potential to resolve internal and external cross-references.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-09T17:54:11Z)
• UnifieR: A Unified Retriever for Large-Scale Retrieval [84.61239936314597]
  Large-scale retrieval is to recall relevant documents from a huge collection given a query. Recent retrieval methods based on pre-trained language models (PLM) can be coarsely categorized into either dense-vector or lexicon-based paradigms. We propose a new learning framework, UnifieR which unifies dense-vector and lexicon-based retrieval in one model with a dual-representing capability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-23T11:01:59Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.