Domain-Partitioned Hybrid RAG for Legal Reasoning: Toward Modular and Explainable Legal AI for India

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.23371v1
• Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2025 20:22:39 GMT
• Title: Domain-Partitioned Hybrid RAG for Legal Reasoning: Toward Modular and Explainable Legal AI for India
• Abstract summary: Legal research in India involves navigating long and heterogeneous documents spanning statutes, constitutional provisions, penal codes, and judicial precedents.<n>Recent retrieval augmented generation (RAG) approaches improve grounding but struggle with multi-hop reasoning.<n>We propose a domain partitioned hybrid RAG and Knowledge Graph architecture designed specifically for Indian legal research.
• Score: 5.022547031373416
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Legal research in India involves navigating long and heterogeneous documents spanning statutes, constitutional provisions, penal codes, and judicial precedents, where purely keyword-based or embedding-only retrieval systems often fail to support structured legal reasoning. Recent retrieval augmented generation (RAG) approaches improve grounding but struggle with multi-hop reasoning, citation chaining, and cross-domain dependencies inherent to legal texts. We propose a domain partitioned hybrid RAG and Knowledge Graph architecture designed specifically for Indian legal research. The system integrates three specialized RAG pipelines covering Supreme Court case law, statutory and constitutional texts, and the Indian Penal Code, each optimized for domain specific retrieval. To enable relational reasoning beyond semantic similarity, we construct a Neo4j based Legal Knowledge Graph capturing structured relationships among cases, statutes, IPC sections, judges, and citations. An LLM driven agentic orchestrator dynamically routes queries across retrieval modules and the knowledge graph, fusing evidence into grounded and citation aware responses. We evaluate the system using a 40 question synthetic legal question answer benchmark curated from authoritative Indian legal sources and assessed via an LLM as a Judge framework. Results show that the hybrid architecture achieves a 70 percent pass rate, substantially outperforming a RAG only baseline at 37.5 percent, with marked improvements in completeness and legal reasoning quality. These findings demonstrate that combining domain partitioned retrieval with structured relational knowledge provides a scalable and interpretable foundation for advanced legal AI systems in the Indian judicial context.

Related papers

• Rhetorical-Role-Aware Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Legal Question Answering over Indian Supreme Court Judgments [0.4893345190925178]
  This research paper proposes a Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) framework that is specific to the legal field in order to assist interactive retrieval and reason about judgments from the Supreme Court of India.<n>The solution uses an enhanced version of RAG framework which consists of rhetorically based chunking, fusion-based retrieval, and cross encoder reranking methods to increase the relevancy of the information retrieved.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-07T05:38:02Z)
• LexPath: A domain-oriented multi-path framework for legal article retrieval [8.207321254335524]
  textscLexPath is a domain-oriented multi-path framework for legal article retrieval.<n>textscLexPath consistently outperforms lexical, dense, hybrid, and adaptive retrieval-augmented generation baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-28T16:43:17Z)
• Citation-Closure Retrieval and Per-Rule Attribution for Real-World Regulatory Compliance Question Answering [54.97384993676565]
  We formalize Regulatory Compliance QA with RegOps-Bench, a novel benchmark featuring an Operational Knowledge Graph derived from complex national R&D regulations.<n>RefWalk traverses cross-document citations, fuses multi-view candidates via max-based aggregation, and enforces per-rule attribution to explicitly map claims to sources.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-28T10:38:38Z)
• NyayaAI: An AI-Powered Legal Assistant Using Multi-Agent Architecture and Retrieval-Augmented Generation [0.7974340311137328]
  Legal information in India remains largely inaccessible due to the complexity of legal language and the sheer volume of legal documentation.<n>This paper presents NyayaAI, an AI-powered legal assistant that automates and simplifies legal for lawyers, law students, and general users.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-11T08:04:07Z)
• LegalOne: A Family of Foundation Models for Reliable Legal Reasoning [54.57434222018289]
  We present LegalOne, a family of foundational models specifically tailored for the Chinese legal domain.<n>LegalOne is developed through a comprehensive three-phase pipeline designed to master legal reasoning.<n>We publicly release the LegalOne weights and the LegalKit evaluation framework to advance the field of Legal AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-31T10:18:32Z)
• SAMVAD: A Multi-Agent System for Simulating Judicial Deliberation Dynamics in India [0.0]
  This paper introduces SAMVAD, an innovative Multi-Agent System (MAS) designed to simulate the deliberation process within the framework of the Indian justice system.<n>Our system comprises agents representing key judicial roles: a Judge, a Prosecution Counsel, a Defense Counsel, and multiple Adjudicators (simulating a judicial bench)<n>A primary contribution of this work is the integration of Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG), grounded in a domain-specific knowledge base of landmark Indian legal documents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-04T01:04:44Z)
• Augmented Question-guided Retrieval (AQgR) of Indian Case Law with LLM, RAG, and Structured Summaries [0.0]
  This paper proposes the use of Large Language Models (LLMs) to facilitate the retrieval of relevant cases.<n>Our approach combines Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) with structured summaries optimized for Indian case law.<n>The system generates targeted legal questions based on factual scenarios to identify relevant case law more effectively.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-23T05:24:44Z)
• Incorporating Legal Structure in Retrieval-Augmented Generation: A Case Study on Copyright Fair Use [44.99833362998488]
  This paper presents a domain-specific implementation of Retrieval-Augmented Generation tailored to the Fair Use Doctrine in U.S. copyright law.<n>Motivated by the increasing prevalence of DMCA takedowns and the lack of accessible legal support for content creators, we propose a structured approach that combines semantic search with legal knowledge graphs and court citation networks to improve retrieval quality and reasoning reliability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-04T15:53:49Z)
• AnnoCaseLaw: A Richly-Annotated Dataset For Benchmarking Explainable Legal Judgment Prediction [56.797874973414636]
  AnnoCaseLaw is a first-of-its-kind dataset of 471 meticulously annotated U.S. Appeals Court negligence cases.<n>Our dataset lays the groundwork for more human-aligned, explainable Legal Judgment Prediction models.<n>Results demonstrate that LJP remains a formidable task, with application of legal precedent proving particularly difficult.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-28T19:14:48Z)
• Bridging Legal Knowledge and AI: Retrieval-Augmented Generation with Vector Stores, Knowledge Graphs, and Hierarchical Non-negative Matrix Factorization [6.0045906216050815]
  Agentic Generative AI, powered by Large Language Models (LLMs) with Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG), Knowledge Graphs (KGs), and Vector Stores (VSs)<n>This technology excels at inferring relationships within vast unstructured or semi-structured datasets.<n>We introduce a generative AI system that integrates RAG, VS, and KG, constructed via Non-Negative Matrix Factorization (NMF)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-27T18:35:39Z)
• MUSER: A Multi-View Similar Case Retrieval Dataset [65.36779942237357]
  Similar case retrieval (SCR) is a representative legal AI application that plays a pivotal role in promoting judicial fairness. Existing SCR datasets only focus on the fact description section when judging the similarity between cases. We present M, a similar case retrieval dataset based on multi-view similarity measurement and comprehensive legal element with sentence-level legal element annotations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-24T08:17:11Z)
• SAILER: Structure-aware Pre-trained Language Model for Legal Case Retrieval [75.05173891207214]
  Legal case retrieval plays a core role in the intelligent legal system. Most existing language models have difficulty understanding the long-distance dependencies between different structures. We propose a new Structure-Aware pre-traIned language model for LEgal case Retrieval.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-22T10:47:01Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.