Leave a Window Out: Modifying the Jackknife for Predictive Inference in Time Series

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.30292v1
• Date: Thu, 28 May 2026 17:41:12 GMT
• Title: Leave a Window Out: Modifying the Jackknife for Predictive Inference in Time Series
• Abstract summary: We show that the vanilla leave-one-out jackknife can suffer an arbitrary loss of coverage even in canonical time series models with mild temporal dependence.<n>We propose a careful modification tailored to such settings, which we term the emphleave-a-window-out (LWO) method.
• Score: 16.625550992320004
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Conformal prediction methods enjoy strong theoretical and empirical predictive inference performance, provided the data is exchangeable, and predictors are trained in a memoryless fashion. However, these assumptions and constraints are impractical in many real-data settings, such as time series (where temporal dependence violates exchangeability, and where memoryless predictors will inevitably have poor predictive accuracy). Recent work shows that the split conformal prediction method is robust to these issues of memory-based predictors and deviations from exchangeability that are common features of time-series data. However, since using sample splitting can lead to lower accuracy, this motivates asking whether other predictive inference methods (that do not rely on data splitting) could also be reliably used in the time series setting. In this work, we show that the vanilla leave-one-out jackknife can suffer an arbitrary loss of coverage even in canonical time series models with mild temporal dependence. As a remedy, we propose a careful modification tailored to such settings, which we term the \emph{leave-a-window-out} (LWO) method, and show that it can achieve valid coverage provided that the model-fitting procedure satisfies mild stability properties. Our proofs are based on quantifying the degree to which the data departs from \emph{cyclic exchangeability}, and we introduce new coefficients to measure the extent of this departure. Experiments on time series data demonstrate that our LWO method often enjoys valid coverage when the vanilla jackknife fails to cover, while producing much narrower intervals than split conformal prediction.

Related papers

• Conformal Prediction Algorithms for Time Series Forecasting: Methods and Benchmarking [0.0]
  Time series temporal dependencies violate the core assumption of data exchangeability.<n>This paper critically examines the main categories of algorithmic solutions designed to address this conflict.<n>We use AutoARIMA as the base forecaster on a large-scale monthly sales dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-26T14:15:08Z)
• Interpretable Multivariate Conformal Prediction with Fast Transductive Standardization [11.505405148959618]
  We propose a conformal prediction method for constructing tight simultaneous prediction intervals for multiple, potentially related, numerical outputs.<n>This method can be combined with any multi-target regression model and guarantees finite-sample coverage.<n>The core idea is a novel emphcoordinate-wise standardization procedure that makes residuals across output dimensions directly comparable.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-17T12:36:00Z)
• A Gentle Introduction to Conformal Time Series Forecasting [0.0]
  This review unifies recent advances in conformal forecasting methods specifically designed to address nonexchangeable data.<n>We first present a theoretical foundation, deriving finite-sample guarantees for split-conformal prediction under mild weak-dependence conditions.<n>We then survey and classify state-of-the-art approaches that mitigate serial dependence by reweighting calibration data, dynamically updating residual distributions, or adaptively tuning target coverage levels in real time.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-17T17:12:51Z)
• ResCP: Reservoir Conformal Prediction for Time Series Forecasting [39.81023599249223]
  Conformal prediction offers a powerful framework for building distribution-free prediction intervals for exchangeable data.<n>We propose Reservoir Conformal Prediction (ResCP), a novel training-free conformal prediction method for time series.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-06T17:37:44Z)
• Predictive inference for time series: why is split conformal effective despite temporal dependence? [8.032656343027146]
  Conformal prediction methods provide distribution-free coverage for any iid or exchangeable data distribution.<n>Using predictors with "memory" -- i.e., predictors that utilize past observations, such as autoregressive models -- further exacerbates this problem.<n>Our results bound the loss of coverage of these methods in terms of a new "switch coefficient", measuring the extent to which temporal dependence within the time series creates violations of exchangeability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-02T18:24:04Z)
• Revisiting Multivariate Time Series Forecasting with Missing Values [65.30332997607141]
  Missing values are common in real-world time series.<n>Current approaches have developed an imputation-then-prediction framework that uses imputation modules to fill in missing values, followed by forecasting on the imputed data.<n>This framework overlooks a critical issue: there is no ground truth for the missing values, making the imputation process susceptible to errors that can degrade prediction accuracy.<n>We introduce Consistency-Regularized Information Bottleneck (CRIB), a novel framework built on the Information Bottleneck principle.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-27T20:57:48Z)
• Non-exchangeable Conformal Prediction with Optimal Transport: Tackling Distribution Shifts with Unlabeled Data [13.788274786492286]
  Conformal prediction is a distribution-free uncertainty quantification method that has gained popularity in the machine learning community.<n>Its most common variant, dubbed split conformal prediction, is also computationally efficient as it boils down to collecting statistics of the model predictions on some calibration data not yet seen by the model.<n>We show that it is possible to estimate the loss in coverage and mitigate arbitrary distribution shifts, offering a principled and broadly applicable solution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-14T16:10:55Z)
• Relational Conformal Prediction for Correlated Time Series [56.59852921638328]
  We address the problem of uncertainty quantification in time series by exploiting correlated sequences.<n>We propose a novel distribution-free approach based on conformal prediction framework and quantile regression.<n>Our approach provides accurate coverage and achieves state-of-the-art uncertainty quantification in relevant benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-13T16:12:17Z)
• Error-quantified Conformal Inference for Time Series [55.11926160774831]
  Uncertainty quantification in time series prediction is challenging due to the temporal dependence and distribution shift on sequential data.<n>We propose itError-quantified Conformal Inference (ECI) by smoothing the quantile loss function.<n>ECI can achieve valid miscoverage control and output tighter prediction sets than other baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-02T15:02:36Z)
• SMURF-THP: Score Matching-based UnceRtainty quantiFication for Transformer Hawkes Process [76.98721879039559]
  We propose SMURF-THP, a score-based method for learning Transformer Hawkes process and quantifying prediction uncertainty. Specifically, SMURF-THP learns the score function of events' arrival time based on a score-matching objective. We conduct extensive experiments in both event type prediction and uncertainty quantification of arrival time.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-25T03:33:45Z)
• TACTiS: Transformer-Attentional Copulas for Time Series [76.71406465526454]
  estimation of time-varying quantities is a fundamental component of decision making in fields such as healthcare and finance. We propose a versatile method that estimates joint distributions using an attention-based decoder. We show that our model produces state-of-the-art predictions on several real-world datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-07T21:37:29Z)
• Evaluating Prediction-Time Batch Normalization for Robustness under Covariate Shift [81.74795324629712]
  We call prediction-time batch normalization, which significantly improves model accuracy and calibration under covariate shift. We show that prediction-time batch normalization provides complementary benefits to existing state-of-the-art approaches for improving robustness. The method has mixed results when used alongside pre-training, and does not seem to perform as well under more natural types of dataset shift.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-19T05:08:43Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.