Demystifying Data Organization for Enhanced LLM Training
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.30334v1
- Date: Thu, 28 May 2026 17:58:53 GMT
- Title: Demystifying Data Organization for Enhanced LLM Training
- Abstract summary: Large Language Models (LLMs) have revolutionized various fields, yet their training efficiency is heavily reliant on effective data curation.<n>This paper explores the influence of data organization on LLM training by reusing pre-computed sample-level scores originally generated for data efficiency.
- Score: 27.639372382009725
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) have revolutionized various fields, yet their training efficiency is heavily reliant on effective data curation. While data selection has been widely studied, the strategic data organization for enhanced training remains an underexplored area, particularly since current LLMs are often trained for only one or a few epochs. This paper systematically explores the influence of data organization on LLM training by reusing pre-computed sample-level scores originally generated for data efficiency, thereby incurring minimal additional computational overhead. We identify and formalize four key guidelines for optimizing data organization: Boundary Sharpening, Cyclic Scheduling, Curriculum Continuity, and Local Diversity. Guided by them, we introduce two novel data ordering methods termed STR and SAW. Extensive experiments across different model scales and data sizes, encompassing both pre-training and SFT stages, validate the effectiveness of our summarized guidelines. They also demonstrate the robustness of our proposed data ordering methods in enhancing the stability and performance of LLM training. Github Link: https://github.com/microsoft/data-efficacy/
Related papers
- Towards Next-Generation LLM Training: From the Data-Centric Perspective [29.115711465172122]
Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable performance across a wide range of tasks and domains, with data playing a central role in enabling these advances.<n>Despite this success, the preparation and effective utilization of the massive datasets required for LLM training remain major bottlenecks.<n>We propose building a robust, agent-based automatic data preparation system that supports automated workflow construction and scalable data management.<n>We argue for a unified data-model interaction training system in which data is dynamically selected, mixed, and reweighted throughout the training process, enabling more efficient, adaptive, and performance-aware data utilization.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-16T01:40:09Z) - Data Science and Technology Towards AGI Part I: Tiered Data Management [53.64581824953229]
We argue that the development of artificial intelligence is entering a new phase of data-model co-evolution.<n>We introduce an L0-L4 tiered data management framework, ranging from raw uncurated resources to organized and verifiable knowledge.<n>We validate the effectiveness of the proposed framework through empirical studies.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-09T18:47:51Z) - Learn More, Forget Less: A Gradient-Aware Data Selection Approach for LLM [51.21051698747157]
We propose a self-adaptive gradient-aware data selection approach (GrADS) for supervised fine-tuning of large language models (LLMs)<n>Specifically, we design self-guided criteria that leverage the magnitude and statistical distribution of gradients to prioritize examples that contribute the most to the model's learning process.<n>Through extensive experimentation with various LLMs across diverse domains such as medicine, law, and finance, GrADS has demonstrated significant efficiency and cost-effectiveness.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-07T08:34:50Z) - A Survey on Efficient Large Language Model Training: From Data-centric Perspectives [42.897899343082806]
We present the first systematic survey of data-efficient Large Language Models post-training from a data-centric perspective.<n>We propose a taxonomy of data-efficient LLM post-training methods, covering data selection, data quality enhancement, synthetic data generation, data distillation and compression, and self-evolving data ecosystems.<n>We hope our work inspires further exploration into maximizing the potential of data utilization in large-scale model training.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-29T17:01:55Z) - Data Efficacy for Language Model Training [29.901090317084005]
Data is fundamental to the training of language models (LM)<n>Recent research has been dedicated to data efficiency, which aims to maximize performance by selecting a minimal or optimal subset of training data.<n>This work introduces a general paradigm, DELT, for considering data efficacy in LM training.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-26T17:59:07Z) - TL-Training: A Task-Feature-Based Framework for Training Large Language Models in Tool Use [72.32614703504122]
Large language models (LLMs) achieve remarkable advancements by leveraging tools to interact with environments.<n>Standard supervised fine-tuning approach, which relies on large-scale datasets, often overlooks task-specific characteristics in tool use.<n>We propose TL-Training, a task-feature-based framework that mitigates the effects of suboptimal training data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-20T02:21:36Z) - Star-Agents: Automatic Data Optimization with LLM Agents for Instruction Tuning [71.2981957820888]
We propose a novel Star-Agents framework, which automates the enhancement of data quality across datasets.
The framework initially generates diverse instruction data with multiple LLM agents through a bespoke sampling method.
The generated data undergo a rigorous evaluation using a dual-model method that assesses both difficulty and quality.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-21T02:30:53Z) - How Data Inter-connectivity Shapes LLMs Unlearning: A Structural Unlearning Perspective [29.924482732745954]
Existing approaches assume data points to-be-forgotten are independent, ignoring their inter-connectivity.<n>We propose PISTOL, a method for compiling structural datasets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-24T17:22:36Z) - How to Train Data-Efficient LLMs [56.41105687693619]
We study data-efficient approaches for pre-training language models (LLMs)
We find that Ask-LLM and Density sampling are the best methods in their respective categories.
In our comparison of 19 samplers, involving hundreds of evaluation tasks and pre-training runs, we find that Ask-LLM and Density are the best methods in their respective categories.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-15T02:27:57Z) - From Quantity to Quality: Boosting LLM Performance with Self-Guided Data Selection for Instruction Tuning [52.257422715393574]
We introduce a self-guided methodology for Large Language Models (LLMs) to autonomously discern and select cherry samples from open-source datasets.
Our key innovation, the Instruction-Following Difficulty (IFD) metric, emerges as a pivotal metric to identify discrepancies between a model's expected responses and its intrinsic generation capability.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-23T09:45:29Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.