BOKBO (Best of K Bad Options): Calibrated Abstention for VLA Policies
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.30660v1
- Date: Thu, 28 May 2026 23:39:09 GMT
- Title: BOKBO (Best of K Bad Options): Calibrated Abstention for VLA Policies
- Abstract summary: Test-time scaling for vision-suite-action (VLA) policies, methods such as RoboMonkey, SEAL, MG-Select, and V-GPS, samples K candidate action chunks at inference and executes the verifier-best.<n>We propose BOKBO, the first conformal abstention layer for K-sample VLA inference, providing finite-sample distribution-free guarantees on executed-violation rate.
- Score: 1.3918848543076061
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Test-time scaling for vision-language-action (VLA) policies, methods such as RoboMonkey, SEAL, MG-Select, and V-GPS, samples K candidate action chunks at inference and executes the verifier-best. When all K candidates are unsafe, the system executes a violating action with no warning. We propose BOKBO, the first conformal abstention layer for K-sample VLA inference, providing finite-sample distribution-free guarantees on executed-violation rate. We provide both global and per-task (Mondrian) variants, with the per-task variant closing the conditional gap on the hardest tasks. Our analysis exposes a structural failure of policy-internal nonconformity scores under perturbation-based K-sampling: the base-policy confidence proxy and K-sample disagreement correlate at 0.98 with the action-noise hyperparameter $σ$, while correlating at the noise floor with actual safety violations. We test the failure's scope by replicating the analysis under token-level temperature sampling and find the failure is mechanism-specific and partially mitigated under policy-stochasticity-based sampling. A learned violation predictor conditioned on semantic visual features and task identity supports tight calibration: at $ε$ = 0.05 on libero_object_temp_x0.1 with OpenVLA-OFT, the conditional CRC bound holds on 86% of bootstrap splits with 78% coverage and 70% net task success. Mondrian-BOKBO raises the minimum per-task conditional hold fraction from 0.71 to 0.93. Results are stable across 5 training seeds, replicate within bootstrap noise on $π_0$-FAST, hold on libero_spatial_temp_x0.1 as a co-equal benchmark, and survive four within-suite distribution shifts. We additionally identify and correct a methodological pitfall: globally-set force thresholds well below expert-typical manipulation forces conflate unsafe behavior with normal manipulation, inflating violation rates by $5\times$.
Related papers
- Semiparametric Inference for Conditional Shapley Feature Importance [0.0]
This paper studies the conditional formulation, in which out-of-coalition features are integrated out under their true conditional distribution.<n>We propose a one-step estimator with K-fold cross-fitting and a U-statistic correction of the squared loss interval.<n>A Pinsker-type bound quantifies the bias from misspecifying the working copula class, while vine copulas keep conditional sampling tractable.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-09-09T15:19:24Z) - Beyond Local Accuracy: A Protocol-Level Identifiability Audit for Controlled LLM Reasoning Evaluation [6.047519836191728]
We formalize a protocol-level identifiability audit over a finite behavioral policy class.<n>The audit requires zero model calls and resolves our diagnostic case.<n>This case shows how evaluation-design validity can be checked structurally before model inference.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-08-13T14:49:47Z) - Robust Average-Reward Markov Decision Processes: Minimax-Optimal Learning via Plug-in Reductions [51.50375419691955]
Distributionally robust Markov decision processes provide a principled framework for sequential decision making under model uncertainty.<n>We study how many samples are necessary and sufficient to learn an $varepsilon$-optimal robust policy under the average-reward criterion.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-08-06T19:49:48Z) - Post-Hoc Trajectory-Risk Certification for Modular LLM-Based Security Agents [1.4915002678801434]
We show that Bonferroni allocation is distribution-free but conservative under correlated errors.<n> coarse-to-fine label selection can create near-perfect measured correlation without learned dependence.<n>A modular certificate using per-stage certificates and a pairwise overlap bound yields a positive average gain of 0.6%.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-08-04T23:48:36Z) - A Paired Testing Protocol for Batch-Conditioned Refusal Robustness in LLM Serving [0.0]
Safety evaluations of language models often treat serving configuration as fixed background infrastructure.<n>We synthesize four artifact-backed studies into a paired testing protocol.<n>Standard vLLM reproduces 22/55 label flips on current score-flip candidates, while enabling VLLM_BATCH_INIANT=1 reduces the same test to 0/55 flips.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-26T23:22:55Z) - Capability and Robustness Cannot Both Be Free: An Information-Theoretic Bound for Vision-Language-Action Models [0.0]
Empirical defenses recover part of the loss at a cost in clean accuracy.<n>We prove that it does, giving the first information-theoretic bound for action-generating policies.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-25T14:16:57Z) - Decoupled Conformal Optimisation: Efficient Prediction Sets via Independent Tuning and Calibration [20.21455697379946]
We propose Decoupled Conformal optimisation (DCO) as a train-tune-calibrate design principle.<n>DCO uses an independent tuning split for efficiency-oriented structural selection and a fresh calibration split for the final conformal quantile.<n>We show that DCO tracks the nominal coverage level closely while often reducing average prediction-set size or interval width relative to PAC-style calibration.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-18T13:10:21Z) - Stopping Reliability in Adaptive Krylov-Shadow Quantum Fisher Information Estimation [0.0]
Adaptive quantum Fisher information (QFI) estimation requires a stopping rule that distinguishes accuracy from apparent numerical stability.<n>We show that a width-only empirical stopping rule, based on interval width and local Krylov stability, can declare convergence at small $(K,M)$ even when the post hoc error exceeds the requested tolerance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-14T04:02:23Z) - When Are Trade-Off Functions Testable from Finite Samples? [4.706977254727891]
We study finite-sample inference for the trade-off function of two unknown probability distributions.<n>By inverting the test, we also obtain simultaneous confidence bands for the whole trade-off curve.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-11T16:07:48Z) - Improving Search Agent with One Line of Code [68.58667107354253]
Tool-based Agentic Reinforcement Learning (TARL) has emerged as a promising paradigm for training search agents to interact with external tools.<n>We propose textbfSearch textbfAgent textbfPolicy textbfOptimization (textbfSAPO), which stabilizes training via a conditional token-level KL constraint.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-10T04:07:39Z) - Optimal Unconstrained Self-Distillation in Ridge Regression: Strict Improvements, Precise Asymptotics, and One-Shot Tuning [61.07540493350384]
Self-distillation (SD) is the process of retraining a student on a mixture of ground-truth and the teacher's own predictions.<n>We show that for any prediction risk, the optimally mixed student improves upon the ridge teacher for every regularization level.<n>We propose a consistent one-shot tuning method to estimate $star$ without grid search, sample splitting, or refitting.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-19T17:21:15Z) - Almost Asymptotically Optimal Active Clustering Through Pairwise Observations [59.20614082241528]
We propose a new analysis framework for clustering $M$ items into an unknown number of $K$ distinct groups using noisy and actively collected responses.<n>We establish a fundamental lower bound on the expected number of queries needed to achieve a desired confidence in the accuracy of the clustering.<n>We develop a computationally feasible variant of the Generalized Likelihood Ratio statistic and show that its performance gap to the lower bound can be accurately empirically estimated.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-05T14:16:47Z) - Unsupervised Conformal Inference: Bootstrapping and Alignment to Control LLM Uncertainty [49.19257648205146]
We propose an unsupervised conformal inference framework for generation.<n>Our gates achieve close-to-nominal coverage and provide tighter, more stable thresholds than split UCP.<n>The result is a label-free, API-compatible gate for test-time filtering.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-26T23:40:47Z) - Robust Conformal Prediction with a Single Binary Certificate [58.450154976190795]
Conformal prediction (CP) converts any model's output to prediction sets with a guarantee to cover the true label with (adjustable) high probability.<n>We propose a robust conformal prediction that produces smaller sets even with significantly lower MC samples.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-07T08:41:53Z) - Contextual Combinatorial Bandits with Probabilistically Triggered Arms [55.9237004478033]
We study contextual bandits with probabilistically triggered arms (C$2$MAB-T) under a variety of smoothness conditions.
Under the triggering modulated (TPM) condition, we devise the C$2$-UC-T algorithm and derive a regret bound $tildeO(dsqrtT)$.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-30T02:51:00Z) - Provably Efficient Safe Exploration via Primal-Dual Policy Optimization [105.7510838453122]
We study the Safe Reinforcement Learning (SRL) problem using the Constrained Markov Decision Process (CMDP) formulation.
We present an provably efficient online policy optimization algorithm for CMDP with safe exploration in the function approximation setting.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-03-01T17:47:03Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.