Eywa: Provenance-Grounded Long-Term Memory for AI Agents
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.30771v1
- Date: Fri, 29 May 2026 02:56:35 GMT
- Title: Eywa: Provenance-Grounded Long-Term Memory for AI Agents
- Abstract summary: Existing memory systems collapse source evidence, extracted facts, retrieved context, and answer policy into one opaque prompt path.<n>We present Eywa, a provenance-grounded memory architecture built around evidence before belief.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: AI agents that persist across sessions need memory they can retrieve, audit, update, and erase. Existing memory systems often collapse source evidence, extracted facts, retrieved context, and answer policy into one opaque prompt path, making failures difficult to diagnose: a wrong answer may come from missing evidence, unsupported extraction, stale state, retrieval loss, or answer-model behavior. We present Eywa, a provenance-grounded memory architecture built around evidence before belief. Eywa stores immutable source evidence before deriving canonical facts, validates extracted memories against typed signals and source support, and retrieves bounded memory context through a deterministic multi-route read path with zero LLM calls inside retrieval. Retrieved context is returned separately from answer instructions, allowing the same memory substrate to be evaluated across frontier, budget, and local answer models. Under a frozen, artifact-recorded retrieval configuration, Eywa reaches 90.19% judge accuracy on the LoCoMo C1-C4 split with Claude Sonnet 4.6 write and QA roles. On LongMemEval-S, it reaches 88.2% retrieval-sufficiency accuracy. On BEAM, a 700-question technical-memory stress benchmark, it reaches 81.45% mean nugget score and 85.29% pass@score >= 0.5. Full per-question artifacts, including questions, gold answers, model answers, retrieved context, and labels, are published at https://eywa.to/research.
Related papers
- AWM: Answerable Working Memory for Long-Document VQA Agents [57.741922050360074]
Working memory should carry answer-supporting evidence across page inspections for later grounded answering.<n>We introduce emphmemory-only answerability, a diagnostic that asks whether a reader can answer from the question and terminal working memory alone.<n>AWM-GRPO improves final-answer accuracy over the RAG baseline by 8.1 and 11.9 points on textscMMLongBench-Doc and textscLongDocURL and reduces the memory-missing-correct rate by 2.7 points over answer-only GRPO.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-08-26T10:35:25Z) - Keep It InMind: Benchmarking the Implicit-Association Blind Spot in Agent Memory [32.094723684433895]
Long-term memory systems store what a user says in an external store and retrieve it when a related query arrives.<n>This interface rests on an assumption so natural that it is rarely stated: a memory that is needed will resemble the query that needs it.<n>We call this failure mode the implicit-association blind spot and introduce InMind, a benchmark spanning ten life domains.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-07-27T12:42:12Z) - MemChain: Learning Interpretable Memory Traces for Memory-Augmented LLM Agents [26.87993979719045]
Memory-augmented LLM agents typically answer queries by retrieving relevant memories and feeding them directly to an answer model.<n>We propose MemChain, a trainable post-retrieval memory policy that transforms retrieved candidates into answer-facing active memory.<n>We show that MemChain consistently achieves state-of-the-art performance across both closed-source and open-weight frozen answer models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-07-27T07:37:43Z) - Ground Truth First: A Longitudinal Evaluation Instrument for Agent Memory, and the Tenure Crossover in Memory-Architecture Rankings [0.0]
A seeded life-script sampler emits facts with validity intervals volatility classes, and source channels before any text exists.<n>A verifier confirms every planted fact and questions are instantiated mechanically from the script.<n>The synthetic, fictionalized corpus embeds features absent from the benchmarks we survey.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-07-24T04:19:45Z) - MemOps: Benchmarking Lifecycle Memory Operations in Long-Horizon Conversations [50.24315431387575]
We introduce MemOps, a benchmark that reformulates conversational memory as a sequence of lifecycle operations.<n>MemOps represents each memory event with a structured trace specifying its trigger, target, scope, state transition, and supporting evidence.<n>Across long-context, retrieval-based, parametric and managed-memory systems, MemOps disentangles failure modes that final-answer accuracy alone conceals.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-07-14T15:33:44Z) - MEMPROBE: Probing Long-Term Agent Memory via Hidden User-State Recovery [58.64329475683699]
We argue that long-term memory should be evaluated as an auditable post-interaction artifact.<n>We instantiate this view in MEMPROBE, a benchmark in which a memory-equipped agent assists simulated users.<n>We find that successful assistance and recoverable memory behave as distinct capabilities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-23T13:52:46Z) - AdaMem: Learning What to Remember for Personalized Long-Horizon LLM Agents [79.03892269184145]
We argue that what is worth remembering is role-dependent, and propose textbfAdaMem (Adaptive Memory)<n>AdaMem improves QA accuracy by up to textbf+9.0% over the uniform Mem0 baseline while shrinking memory volume by textbf9%.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-19T06:35:52Z) - DeferMem: Query-Time Evidence Distillation via Reinforcement Learning for Long-Term Memory QA [3.56156695760535]
Large language model (LLM) agents still struggle with long-term memory question answering.<n>We present DeferMem, a long-term memory framework that decouples this problem into high-recall candidate retrieval and query-conditioned evidence distillation.<n>On LoCoMo and LongMemEval-S, DeferMem surpasses strong baselines in QA accuracy and memory-system efficiency.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-21T12:36:46Z) - Rethinking How to Remember: Beyond Atomic Facts in Lifelong LLM Agent Memory [88.81430082035617]
LLM agents require a memory system that can faithfully store, efficiently retrieve, and deeply reason over accumulated dialogue history.<n>We propose TriMem, which maintains three coexisting representation granularities, including raw dialogue segments anchored by source identifiers for storage fidelity.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-19T15:05:06Z) - MemQ: Integrating Q-Learning into Self-Evolving Memory Agents over Provenance DAGs [47.66730296440261]
We introduce MemQ, which propagates credit backward through a provenance DAG that records which memories were retrieved when each new memory was created.<n>Across six benchmarks, MemQ achieves the highest success rate on all six in generalization evaluation and runtime learning.<n>We further study how $$ and $$ interact with the EC-MDP structure, providing principled guidance for parameter selection and future research.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-08T18:30:24Z) - From Unstructured Recall to Schema-Grounded Memory: Reliable AI Memory via Iterative, Schema-Aware Extraction [39.146761527401424]
Persistent AI memory is often reduced to a retrieval problem.<n>This paper argues that reliable external AI memory must be schema-grounded harnesses.<n>We present an iterative, schema-aware write path that decomposes memory ingestion into object detection, field detection, and field-value extraction.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-30T14:14:02Z) - EviMem: Evidence-Gap-Driven Iterative Retrieval for Long-Term Conversational Memory [19.027571478872]
We present EviMem, combining IRIS (Iterative Retrieval via Insufficiency Signals) and LaceMem (Layered Architecture for Conversational Evidence Memory)<n>On LoCoMo, EviMem improves Judge Accuracy over MIRIX on temporal (73.3% to 81.6%) and multi-hop (65.9% to 85.2%) questions at 4.5x lower latency.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-30T10:37:04Z) - Learning When to Remember: Risk-Sensitive Contextual Bandits for Abstention-Aware Memory Retrieval in LLM-Based Coding Agents [0.0]
coding agents increasingly rely on external memory to reuse prior experience, repair traces, and repository-local operational knowledge.<n>This paper reframes issue-memory use as a selective, risk-sensitive control problem rather than a pure top-k retrieval problem.<n>We introduce RSCB-MC, a risk-sensitive contextual bandit memory controller that decides whether an agent should use no memory, inject the top resolution, summarize multiple candidates, perform high-precision or high-recall retrieval, abstain, or ask for feedback.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-30T00:32:53Z) - MemSearch-o1: Empowering Large Language Models with Reasoning-Aligned Memory Growth in Agentic Search [59.98962867649009]
We propose MemSearch-o1, an agentic search framework built on reasoning-aligned memory growth and retracing.<n>MemSearch-o1 grows fine-grained memory fragments from memory seed tokens from queries, then retraces and deeply refines the memory via a contribution function, and finally reorganizes a globally connected memory path.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-19T05:35:06Z) - Evoking User Memory: Personalizing LLM via Recollection-Familiarity Adaptive Retrieval [59.295767860331004]
RF-Mem is a familiarity uncertainty-guided dual-path memory retriever.<n>It embeds human-like dual-process recognition into the retriever.<n>It consistently outperforms one-shot retrieval and full-context reasoning under fixed budget and latency constraints.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-10T06:31:44Z) - CIMemories: A Compositional Benchmark for Contextual Integrity of Persistent Memory in LLMs [62.116710797795314]
Large Language Models (LLMs) increasingly use persistent memory from past interactions to enhance personalization and task performance.<n>We present CIMemories, a benchmark for evaluating whether LLMs appropriately control information flow from memory based on task context.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-18T21:51:23Z) - Open-domain Question Answering via Chain of Reasoning over Heterogeneous
Knowledge [82.5582220249183]
We propose a novel open-domain question answering (ODQA) framework for answering single/multi-hop questions across heterogeneous knowledge sources.
Unlike previous methods that solely rely on the retriever for gathering all evidence in isolation, our intermediary performs a chain of reasoning over the retrieved set.
Our system achieves competitive performance on two ODQA datasets, OTT-QA and NQ, against tables and passages from Wikipedia.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-10-22T03:21:32Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.