What Makes LVLMs Hallucinate Less? Unveiling the Architectural Factors Behind Hallucination Robustness

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.30911v1
• Date: Fri, 29 May 2026 06:47:31 GMT
• Title: What Makes LVLMs Hallucinate Less? Unveiling the Architectural Factors Behind Hallucination Robustness
• Abstract summary: Hallucination remains one of the key challenges undermining the reliability of Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs)<n>We argue that hallucination fundamentally stems from how the model architecture is designed.<n>This study provides the first systematic exploration linking architecture-level design to hallucination, offering practical guidance for developing reliable and efficient LVLMs.
• Score: 33.32946342654949
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Hallucination remains one of the key challenges undermining the reliability of Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs). But what makes an LVLM hallucinate less? Many existing efforts focus on improving internal components of the model. We argue that hallucination fundamentally stems from how the model architecture is designed. To investigate this, we factor the architecture design into three dimensions: Linguistic Foundation (LF), Visual Representation (VR), and Semantic Alignment (SA), and categorize hallucinations into Co-occurrence, Similarity, and previously overlooked Uncertainty types. Building on this formulation, we propose CoSimUE, a benchmark that creates fine-grained hallucination scenarios through controlled textual perturbations and random perturbations, enabling mapping between design choices and hallucination behaviors. Experiments across 7 design aspects show that: 1) the widely emphasized scaling of model parameters has only limited impact on reducing all three types of hallucinations; 2) larger and better-trained language foundations can reduce co-occurrence hallucinations; 3) stronger visual encoders and higher resolutions mitigate similarity errors; 4) effective alignment strategies alleviate uncertainty hallucinations. 5) Furthermore, cross-dimensional analysis reveals that jointly enhancing visual fidelity and alignment quality yields the most comprehensive improvements. This study provides the first systematic exploration linking architecture-level design to hallucination robustness, offering practical guidance for developing reliable and efficient LVLMs.

Related papers

• When Prompts Override Vision: Prompt-Induced Hallucinations in LVLMs [54.411658510110215]
  We propose HalluScope to better understand the extent to which different factors induce hallucinations.<n>HalluVL-DPO is a framework for fine-tuning off-the-shelf LVLMs towards more visually grounded responses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-23T17:54:36Z)
• CRoPS: A Training-Free Hallucination Mitigation Framework for Vision-Language Models [3.0991186209192794]
  Hallucinated content undermines reliability in real-world use.<n>New model captures hallucination effects by selectively removing key text tokens.<n>Generalized Contrastive Decoding integrates multiple hallucinated models to represent diverse hallucination sources.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-02T11:39:00Z)
• Two Causes, Not One: Rethinking Omission and Fabrication Hallucinations in MLLMs [31.601057368065877]
  Existing methods, based on the flawed assumption that omission and fabrication hallucinations share a common cause, often reduce omissions only to trigger more fabrications.<n>In this work, we overturn this view by demonstrating that omission hallucinations arise from insufficient confidence when mapping perceived visual features to linguistic expressions.<n>We propose the Visual-Semantic Attention Potential Field, a conceptual framework that reveals how visual evidence to infer the presence or absence of objects.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-30T05:47:41Z)
• SHALE: A Scalable Benchmark for Fine-grained Hallucination Evaluation in LVLMs [52.03164192840023]
  Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) still suffer from hallucinations, i.e., generating content inconsistent with input or established world knowledge.<n>We propose an automated data construction pipeline that produces scalable, controllable, and diverse evaluation data.<n>We construct SHALE, a benchmark designed to assess both faithfulness and factuality hallucinations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-13T07:58:01Z)
• HalluLens: LLM Hallucination Benchmark [49.170128733508335]
  Large language models (LLMs) often generate responses that deviate from user input or training data, a phenomenon known as "hallucination"<n>This paper introduces a comprehensive hallucination benchmark, incorporating both new extrinsic and existing intrinsic evaluation tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-24T13:40:27Z)
• Who Brings the Frisbee: Probing Hidden Hallucination Factors in Large Vision-Language Model via Causality Analysis [14.033320167387194]
  A major challenge in their real-world application is hallucination, where LVLMs generate non-existent visual elements, eroding user trust.<n>We hypothesize that hidden factors, such as objects, contexts, and semantic foreground-background structures, induce hallucination.<n>By analyzing the causality between images, text prompts, and network saliency, we systematically explore interventions to block these factors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-04T01:23:57Z)
• Unified Triplet-Level Hallucination Evaluation for Large Vision-Language Models [22.996176483599868]
  We develop a framework to measure the object and relation hallucination in Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) simultaneously.<n>Based on our framework, we introduce Tri-HE, a novel Triplet-level Hallucination Evaluation benchmark.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-30T15:25:06Z)
• VideoHallucer: Evaluating Intrinsic and Extrinsic Hallucinations in Large Video-Language Models [59.05674402770661]
  This work introduces VideoHallucer, the first comprehensive benchmark for hallucination detection in large video-language models (LVLMs) VideoHallucer categorizes hallucinations into two main types: intrinsic and extrinsic, offering further subcategories for detailed analysis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-24T06:21:59Z)
• AutoHallusion: Automatic Generation of Hallucination Benchmarks for Vision-Language Models [91.78328878860003]
  Large vision-language models (LVLMs) are prone to hallucinations. benchmarks often rely on hand-crafted corner cases whose failure patterns may not generalize well. We develop AutoHallusion, the first automated benchmark generation approach.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-16T11:44:43Z)
• Alleviating Hallucinations in Large Vision-Language Models through Hallucination-Induced Optimization [123.54980913741828]
  Large Visual Language Models (LVLMs) have demonstrated exceptional abilities in understanding multimodal data.<n>They invariably suffer from hallucinations, leading to a disconnect between the generated text and the corresponding images.<n>Almost all current visual contrastive decoding methods attempt to mitigate these hallucinations by introducing visual uncertainty information.<n>However, they struggle to precisely induce the hallucinatory tokens, which severely limits their effectiveness in mitigating hallucinations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-24T08:46:31Z)
• Plausible May Not Be Faithful: Probing Object Hallucination in Vision-Language Pre-training [66.0036211069513]
  Large-scale vision-language pre-trained models are prone to hallucinate non-existent visual objects when generating text. We show that models achieving better scores on standard metrics could hallucinate objects more frequently. Surprisingly, we find that patch-based features perform the best and smaller patch resolution yields a non-trivial reduction in object hallucination.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-14T10:27:22Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.