VideoHallucer: Evaluating Intrinsic and Extrinsic Hallucinations in Large Video-Language Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.16338v1
• Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2024 06:21:59 GMT
• Title: VideoHallucer: Evaluating Intrinsic and Extrinsic Hallucinations in Large Video-Language Models
• Authors: Yuxuan Wang, Yueqian Wang, Dongyan Zhao, Cihang Xie, Zilong Zheng,
• Abstract summary: This work introduces VideoHallucer, the first comprehensive benchmark for hallucination detection in large video-language models (LVLMs) VideoHallucer categorizes hallucinations into two main types: intrinsic and extrinsic, offering further subcategories for detailed analysis.
• Score: 59.05674402770661
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Recent advancements in Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have extended their capabilities to video understanding. Yet, these models are often plagued by "hallucinations", where irrelevant or nonsensical content is generated, deviating from the actual video context. This work introduces VideoHallucer, the first comprehensive benchmark for hallucination detection in large video-language models (LVLMs). VideoHallucer categorizes hallucinations into two main types: intrinsic and extrinsic, offering further subcategories for detailed analysis, including object-relation, temporal, semantic detail, extrinsic factual, and extrinsic non-factual hallucinations. We adopt an adversarial binary VideoQA method for comprehensive evaluation, where pairs of basic and hallucinated questions are crafted strategically. By evaluating eleven LVLMs on VideoHallucer, we reveal that i) the majority of current models exhibit significant issues with hallucinations; ii) while scaling datasets and parameters improves models' ability to detect basic visual cues and counterfactuals, it provides limited benefit for detecting extrinsic factual hallucinations; iii) existing models are more adept at detecting facts than identifying hallucinations. As a byproduct, these analyses further instruct the development of our self-PEP framework, achieving an average of 5.38% improvement in hallucination resistance across all model architectures.

Related papers

• From Pixels to Tokens: Revisiting Object Hallucinations in Large Vision-Language Models [15.401221354325672]
  Hallucinations in large vision models (LVLMs) are a significant challenge, i.e., generating objects that are not presented in the visual input. Recent studies often attribute hallucinations to a lack of understanding of visual input, yet ignore a more fundamental issue: the model's inability to extract or decouple visual features. In this paper, we revisit the hallucinations in LVLMs from an architectural perspective, investigating whether the primary cause lies in the visual encoder (feature extraction) or the modal alignment module (feature decoupling)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-09T11:46:32Z)
• Detecting and Mitigating Hallucination in Large Vision Language Models via Fine-Grained AI Feedback [48.065569871444275]
  We propose detecting and mitigating hallucinations in Large Vision Language Models (LVLMs) via fine-grained AI feedback. We generate a small-size hallucination annotation dataset by proprietary models. Then, we propose a detect-then-rewrite pipeline to automatically construct preference dataset for training hallucination mitigating model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-22T14:46:10Z)
• Quantity Matters: Towards Assessing and Mitigating Number Hallucination in Large Vision-Language Models [57.42800112251644]
  We focus on a specific type of hallucination-number hallucination, referring to models incorrectly identifying the number of certain objects in pictures. We devise a training approach aimed at improving consistency to reduce number hallucinations, which leads to an 8% enhancement in performance over direct finetuning methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-03T02:31:11Z)
• Hal-Eval: A Universal and Fine-grained Hallucination Evaluation Framework for Large Vision Language Models [36.98580310654515]
  We introduce a refined taxonomy of hallucinations, featuring a new category: Event Hallucination. We then utilize advanced LLMs to generate and filter fine grained hallucinatory data consisting of various types of hallucinations. The proposed benchmark distinctively assesses LVLMs ability to tackle a broad spectrum of hallucinations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-24T05:14:52Z)
• Analyzing and Mitigating Object Hallucination in Large Vision-Language Models [110.12460299261531]
  Large vision-language models (LVLMs) have shown remarkable abilities in understanding visual information with human languages. LVLMs still suffer from object hallucination, which is the problem of generating descriptions that include objects that do not actually exist in the images. We propose a powerful algorithm, LVLM Hallucination Revisor (LURE), to rectify object hallucination in LVLMs by reconstructing less hallucinatory descriptions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-01T18:10:53Z)
• AutoHall: Automated Hallucination Dataset Generation for Large Language Models [56.92068213969036]
  This paper introduces a method for automatically constructing model-specific hallucination datasets based on existing fact-checking datasets called AutoHall. We also propose a zero-resource and black-box hallucination detection method based on self-contradiction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-30T05:20:02Z)
• Plausible May Not Be Faithful: Probing Object Hallucination in Vision-Language Pre-training [66.0036211069513]
  Large-scale vision-language pre-trained models are prone to hallucinate non-existent visual objects when generating text. We show that models achieving better scores on standard metrics could hallucinate objects more frequently. Surprisingly, we find that patch-based features perform the best and smaller patch resolution yields a non-trivial reduction in object hallucination.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-14T10:27:22Z)
• Thinking Hallucination for Video Captioning [0.76146285961466]
  In video captioning, there are two kinds of hallucination: object and action hallucination. We identify three main factors: (i) inadequate visual features extracted from pre-trained models, (ii) improper influences of source and target contexts during multi-modal fusion, and (iii) exposure bias in the training strategy. Our method achieves state-of-the-art performance on the MSR-Video to Text (MSR-VTT) and the Microsoft Research Video Description Corpus (MSVD) datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-28T06:15:42Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.