iVGR: Internalizing Visually Grounded Reasoning for MLLMs with Reinforcement Learning
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.31096v1
- Date: Fri, 29 May 2026 10:07:25 GMT
- Title: iVGR: Internalizing Visually Grounded Reasoning for MLLMs with Reinforcement Learning
- Abstract summary: Visually grounded Chain-of-Thought (CoT) has emerged as a promising paradigm to enhance fine-grained perception in large language models (MLLMs)<n>Mandating explicit object boxes in visually grounded CoT during inference often degrades performance compared to standard textual CoT.<n>We propose Internalizing Visually Grounded Reasoning (textbfiVGR), a novel reinforcement learning framework that transfers localization capabilities into the textual reasoning process.
- Score: 35.83366559347647
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: While visually grounded Chain-of-Thought (CoT) has emerged as a promising paradigm to enhance fine-grained perception in multimodal large language models (MLLMs), its efficacy during the inference phase remains underexplored. In this work, we empirically find that mandating explicit object boxes in visually grounded CoT during inference often degrades performance compared to standard textual CoT, which reasons without explicit visual grounding. We hypothesize that the visual localization capability can be internalized into the textual CoT and that the mandatory explicit grounding introduces unnecessary interference with the model's primary objective of answer prediction. To address this problem, we propose Internalizing Visually Grounded Reasoning (\textbf{iVGR}), a novel reinforcement learning framework that transfers localization capabilities into the textual reasoning process. We employ a dual-stream training strategy, where a textual stream is aligned with a high-quality visually grounded stream via a proposed consistency reward, enabling the model to localize accurately without explicit grounding during inference. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our method significantly outperforms existing baselines on fine-grained benchmarks, while maintaining the flexibility to support tool-assisted inference workflows.
Related papers
- Enhancing Multimodal In-Context Learning via Inductive-Deductive Reasoning [65.15766304205657]
In-context learning (ICL) allows large models to adapt to tasks using a few examples, yet its extension to vision-language models (VLMs) remains fragile.<n>Our analysis reveals that the fundamental limitation lies in an inductive gap, models often produce correct answers from flawed reasoning.<n>We introduce a framework that restructures multimodal ICL as a principled inductive-deductive process.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-04T09:18:19Z) - Decompose, Look, and Reason: Reinforced Latent Reasoning for VLMs [6.111899371682025]
Vision-Language Models often struggle with complex visual reasoning due to the visual information loss in textual CoT.<n>We propose emph"Decompose, Look, and Reason" (DLR), a reinforced latent reasoning framework.<n>Experiments on vision-centric benchmarks show that DLR consistently outperforms strong baselines.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-08T18:52:27Z) - ACT Now: Preempting LVLM Hallucinations via Adaptive Context Integration [71.21097024566285]
Large-Language Models (LVLMs) frequently suffer from severe hallucination issues.<n>Existing mitigation strategies rely on linguistic, single-step states to enhance visual focus or suppress strong priors.<n>We propose Adaptive Context in VisionTegration (ACT), a training-free inference intervention method that mitigates hallucination through the adaptive integration of contextual information.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-01T14:49:50Z) - Explaining multimodal LLMs via intra-modal token interactions [55.27436637894534]
Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have achieved remarkable success across diverse vision-language tasks, yet their internal decision-making mechanisms remain insufficiently understood.<n>We propose enhancing interpretability by leveraging intra-modal interaction.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-26T14:39:13Z) - Context-Informed Grounding Supervision [102.11698329887226]
Context-INformed Grounding Supervision (CINGS) is a post-training supervision in which the model is trained with relevant context prepended to the response.<n>Our experiments demonstrate that models trained with CINGS exhibit stronger grounding in both textual and visual domains.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-18T14:13:56Z) - Reinforcing Spatial Reasoning in Vision-Language Models with Interwoven Thinking and Visual Drawing [62.447497430479174]
Drawing to reason in space is a novel paradigm that enables LVLMs to reason through elementary drawing operations in the visual space.<n>Our model, named VILASR, consistently outperforms existing methods across diverse spatial reasoning benchmarks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-11T17:41:50Z) - Ground-R1: Incentivizing Grounded Visual Reasoning via Reinforcement Learning [96.01617809845396]
Ground-R1 is a reinforcement learning framework that enables grounded visual reasoning without requiring explicit evidence or rationale annotations.<n>Ground-R1 achieves superior performance and exhibits emergent cognitive behaviors such as uncertainty awareness, spatial perception, and iterative refinement.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-26T17:51:47Z) - Causality-based Cross-Modal Representation Learning for
Vision-and-Language Navigation [15.058687283978077]
Vision-and-Language Navigation (VLN) has gained significant research interest in recent years due to its potential applications in real-world scenarios.
Existing VLN methods struggle with the issue of spurious associations, resulting in poor generalization with a significant performance gap between seen and unseen environments.
We propose a unified framework CausalVLN based on the causal learning paradigm to train a robust navigator capable of learning unbiased feature representations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-06T02:01:38Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.