Wind Turbine Maintenance Log Labelling Framework: LLM-Driven Data Correction and Enrichment via Semantic Extraction of Reliability Intelligence

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.31281v1
• Date: Fri, 29 May 2026 13:13:03 GMT
• Title: Wind Turbine Maintenance Log Labelling Framework: LLM-Driven Data Correction and Enrichment via Semantic Extraction of Reliability Intelligence
• Abstract summary: Failure event descriptions within historical maintenance logs are a source of valuable reliability intelligence.<n>They typically appear as unstructured natural language entries, rendering them inaccessible for quantitative analysis.<n>This paper presents a novel methodology leveraging a large language model (LLM) to systematically standardise and structure maintenance logs.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: As wind turbine fleets age, data-driven reliability engineering is essential to optimise their operation and maintenance for service life extension and levelised cost of energy reduction. Failure event descriptions within historical maintenance logs are a source of valuable reliability intelligence. However, they typically appear as unstructured natural language entries, rendering them inaccessible for quantitative analysis. This paper presents a novel methodology leveraging a large language model (LLM) to systematically standardise and structure maintenance logs based on their free-text descriptors. Operating on a dataset of 16,316 maintenance logs from 280 turbines monitored over nine years, the developed model-agnostic framework autonomously corrected hierarchical system codes and extracted evidence-based taxonomies of maintenance actions and failure modes. The automated pipeline successfully structured over 70% of the dataset. It resolved pervasive misclassification issues, such as isolating previously unclassified pitch system faults and restoring missing system codes, and enriched the records by applying empirical taxonomies to label specific actions taken and failure modes addressed. By using system-based log batches to construct empirical dictionaries of failure modes, observable symptoms, dominant mechanisms, and candidate causes, this approach reduces the inherent subjectivity of manual failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA). Ultimately, the methodology provides a highly scalable, cost-effective blueprint for translating large sets of qualitative field observations into quantitative reliability metrics, laying the foundation for integrated root-cause analysis across the renewable energy sector, improved FMEA, and advanced predictive maintenance.

Related papers

• Can Large Language Models Generate Observability-Aware Code? [51.30941152293301]
  We present a systematic study of observability in agent-generated systems.<n>Our results reveal a consistent gap between diagnostic semantics at the source level and fault signals at runtime.<n>We introduce an observability-oriented skill, which can serve as a guidance to improve both diagnostic semantics and fault-signal exposure.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-07T03:20:52Z)
• LiveFMBench: Unveiling the Power and Limits of Agentic Workflows in Specification Generation [75.05397479715576]
  Large language models (LLMs) and agents have shown promising progress, but their true capabilities and failure modes remain unclear.<n>We present the first systematic and contamination-aware study of LLM- and agent-based formal specification generation for C programs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-02T11:31:33Z)
• Bug-Report-Driven Fault Localization: Industrial Benchmarking and Lesson Learned at ABB Robotics [1.8479315677380452]
  This study investigates if artificial intelligence can support fault localization using only the natural-language content of bug reports.<n>By relying on textual information, our approach requires no access to source execution traces, or static analysis artifacts.<n>We demonstrated that historical bug reports can be systematically used for text-based, artificial intelligence-assisted fault localization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-28T14:27:02Z)
• TopoPilot: Reliable Conversational Workflow Automation for Topological Data Analysis and Visualization [4.62716665682001]
  TopoPilot is a reliable and agentic framework for automating complex scientific visualization.<n>TopoPilot incorporates systematic guardrails and verification mechanisms to ensure reliable operation.<n>In evaluations, TopoPilot achieves a success rate exceeding 99%, compared to under 50% for baselines without comprehensive guardrails and checks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-26T05:56:53Z)
• JFTA-Bench: Evaluate LLM's Ability of Tracking and Analyzing Malfunctions Using Fault Trees [64.57426735981902]
  In maintenance of complex systems, fault trees are used to locate problems and provide targeted solutions.<n>To enable fault trees stored as images to be directly processed by large language models, we propose a novel textual representation of fault trees.<n>We construct a benchmark for multi-turn dialogue systems that emphasizes robust interaction in complex environments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-24T09:13:43Z)
• Dynamic analysis enhances issue resolution [53.50448142467294]
  DAIRA (Dynamic Analysis-enhanced Issue Resolution Agent) is an automated repair framework that embeds dynamic analysis into the agent's reasoning cycle.<n> Driven by a Test Tracing-Driven methodology, DAIRA utilizes lightweight monitors to extract critical runtime data.<n>When powered by Gemini 3 Flash Preview, DAIRA establishes a new state-of-the-art (SOTA) performance, achieving a 79.4% resolution rate on the SWE-bench Verified dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-23T14:48:54Z)
• Exploratory Semantic Reliability Analysis of Wind Turbine Maintenance Logs using Large Language Models [0.0]
  This paper addresses the gap in leveraging modern large language models (LLMs) for more complex reasoning tasks.<n>We introduce an exploratory framework that uses LLMs to move beyond classification and perform semantic analysis.<n>The results demonstrate that LLMs can function as powerful "reliability co-pilots," moving beyond labelling to synthesise textual information and actionable, expert-level hypotheses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-26T14:00:20Z)
• A Comparative Benchmark of Large Language Models for Labelling Wind Turbine Maintenance Logs [0.0]
  This paper presents a framework for benchmarking Large Language Models (LLMs) on the task of classifying complex industrial records.<n>To promote transparency and encourage further research, this framework has been made publicly available as an open-source tool.<n>We quantify a clear performance hierarchy, identifying top models that exhibit high alignment with a benchmark standard and trustworthy, well-calibrated confidence scores.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-08T15:48:17Z)
• Are You Getting What You Pay For? Auditing Model Substitution in LLM APIs [71.7892165868749]
  Commercial Large Language Model (LLM) APIs create a fundamental trust problem.<n>Users pay for specific models but have no guarantee that providers deliver them faithfully.<n>We formalize this model substitution problem and evaluate detection methods under realistic adversarial conditions.<n>We propose and evaluate the use of Trusted Execution Environments (TEEs) as one practical and robust solution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-07T03:57:41Z)
• A hybrid feature learning approach based on convolutional kernels for ATM fault prediction using event-log data [5.859431341476405]
  We present a predictive model based on a convolutional kernel (MiniROCKET and HYDRA) to extract features from event-log data. The proposed methodology is applied to a significant real-world collected dataset. The model was integrated into a container-based decision support system to support operators in the timely maintenance of ATMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-17T08:55:53Z)
• LogLAB: Attention-Based Labeling of Log Data Anomalies via Weak Supervision [63.08516384181491]
  We present LogLAB, a novel modeling approach for automated labeling of log messages without requiring manual work by experts. Our method relies on estimated failure time windows provided by monitoring systems to produce precise labeled datasets in retrospect. Our evaluation shows that LogLAB consistently outperforms nine benchmark approaches across three different datasets and maintains an F1-score of more than 0.98 even at large failure time windows.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-02T15:16:08Z)
• Robust and Transferable Anomaly Detection in Log Data using Pre-Trained Language Models [59.04636530383049]
  Anomalies or failures in large computer systems, such as the cloud, have an impact on a large number of users. We propose a framework for anomaly detection in log data, as a major troubleshooting source of system information.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-23T09:17:05Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.