The Sword, Shield, and Achilles' Heel: Characterizing the Linguistic Inductive Bias of Large Language Models for Spatial Reasoning in Navigation Planning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.31404v1
• Date: Fri, 29 May 2026 15:09:25 GMT
• Title: The Sword, Shield, and Achilles' Heel: Characterizing the Linguistic Inductive Bias of Large Language Models for Spatial Reasoning in Navigation Planning
• Abstract summary: Large Language Model (LLM)-based navigation systems commonly construct explicit spatial representations (e.g., topological graphs, semantic maps) as inputs.<n>We propose a dual-interventional framework that disentangles linguistic structures from different contextual cues to evaluate the linguistic inductive bias of LLMs for navigation planning.<n>Our study shows that effective text-based spatial representations in LLM-based navigation should preserve topological integrity, calibrate representational compression to model capacity, and ensure semantic correctness.
• Score: 23.983002175011205
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: Large Language Model (LLM)-based navigation systems commonly construct explicit spatial representations (e.g., topological graphs, semantic raster maps) and translate them into textual descriptions as LLMs' inputs. However, the linguistic structures of such text-based spatial representations and the choices of contextual features (e.g., topology, geometry) they contain are often treated as neutral engineering decisions rather than key factors that shape LLMs' behavior. To fill the gap, we propose a dual-interventional framework that disentangles linguistic structures from different contextual cues to evaluate the linguistic inductive bias of LLMs for navigation planning. In the framework, representation intervention varies the linguistic format and the degree of linguistic compression, clarifying when linguistic representations support or inhibit navigation planning. Context intervention, combined with contextual feature combination and conflict probing, explicitly clarifies the preferences and weaknesses of LLMs when processing different contextual cues. Experiments across diverse spatial reasoning tasks and multiple model scales reveal a consistent pattern: topological information is a sturdy shield and the backbone of robust planning; linguistic format is a double-edged sword whose effect depends on model size, task demands, and the compression level; and semantic information is a fatal Achilles' heel -- incorrect semantic cues can systematically derail the planning process. Overall, our study shows that effective text-based spatial representations in LLM-based navigation should preserve topological integrity, calibrate representational compression to model capacity, and ensure semantic correctness, rather than simply adopting a single representation. Our code is publicly available at https://github.com/jonesdong150/LLM-Navigation-Inductive-Bias.

Related papers

• Shaping Schema via Language Representation as the Next Frontier for LLM Intelligence Expanding [88.11781604392606]
  This paper defines language representation as the linguistic and symbolic constructs used to map and model the real world.<n>We argue that shaping schemas through advanced language representation is the next frontier for expanding Large Language Models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-10T02:42:29Z)
• State Space Models are Effective Sign Language Learners: Exploiting Phonological Compositionality for Vocabulary-Scale Recognition [0.0]
  We introduce PHONSSM, enforcing phonological decomposition through anatomically-grounded graph attention, explicit factorization into subspaces, and classification enabling few-shot transfer.<n>Using skeleton data alone on the largest ASL dataset ever assembled (5,565 signs), PHONSSM achieves 72.1% on WLASL2000 (+18.4pp over skeleton SOTA), surpassing most RGB methods without video input.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-09T20:50:52Z)
• The Roots of Performance Disparity in Multilingual Language Models: Intrinsic Modeling Difficulty or Design Choices? [42.515122675241486]
  Current systems deliver uneven performance across the world's languages.<n>This survey examines why these gaps persist and whether they reflect intrinsic linguistic difficulty or modeling artifacts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-12T05:25:39Z)
• Drivel-ology: Challenging LLMs with Interpreting Nonsense with Depth [21.092167028989632]
  Drivelology is a linguistic phenomenon characterised by "nonsense with depth"<n>We construct a benchmark dataset of over 1,200+ meticulously curated and diverse examples across English, Mandarin, Spanish, French, Japanese, and Korean.<n>We find that current large language models (LLMs) consistently fail to grasp the layered semantics of Drivelological text.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-04T03:58:55Z)
• Linguistics-aware Masked Image Modeling for Self-supervised Scene Text Recognition [50.86415025650168]
  Masked image modeling (MIM) tends to exploit local structures to reconstruct visual patterns, resulting in limited linguistic knowledge.<n>We propose a Linguistics-aware Masked Image Modeling (LMIM) approach, which channels the linguistic information into the decoding process of MIM through a separate branch.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-24T14:53:35Z)
• High-Dimensional Interlingual Representations of Large Language Models [65.77317753001954]
  Large language models (LLMs) trained on massive multilingual datasets hint at the formation of interlingual constructs.<n>We explore 31 diverse languages varying on their resource-levels, typologies, and geographical regions.<n>We find that multilingual LLMs exhibit inconsistent cross-lingual alignments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-14T10:39:27Z)
• Large Language Models are Interpretable Learners [53.56735770834617]
  In this paper, we show a combination of Large Language Models (LLMs) and symbolic programs can bridge the gap between expressiveness and interpretability. The pretrained LLM with natural language prompts provides a massive set of interpretable modules that can transform raw input into natural language concepts. As the knowledge learned by LSP is a combination of natural language descriptions and symbolic rules, it is easily transferable to humans (interpretable) and other LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-25T02:18:15Z)
• Interpretability of Language Models via Task Spaces [14.543168558734001]
  We present an alternative approach to interpret language models (LMs) We focus on the quality of LM processing, with a focus on their language abilities. We construct 'linguistic task spaces' that shed light on the connections LMs draw between language phenomena.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-10T16:34:30Z)
• Integrating Language Guidance into Vision-based Deep Metric Learning [78.18860829585182]
  We propose to learn metric spaces which encode semantic similarities as embedding space. These spaces should be transferable to classes beyond those seen during training. This causes learned embedding spaces to encode incomplete semantic context and misrepresent the semantic relation between classes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-16T11:06:50Z)
• Learning Universal Representations from Word to Sentence [89.82415322763475]
  This work introduces and explores the universal representation learning, i.e., embeddings of different levels of linguistic unit in a uniform vector space. We present our approach of constructing analogy datasets in terms of words, phrases and sentences. We empirically verify that well pre-trained Transformer models incorporated with appropriate training settings may effectively yield universal representation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-10T03:53:18Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.