LLMs for Cardiovascular Risk Prediction from Structured Clinical Data

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.00031v1
• Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2026 00:16:05 GMT
• Title: LLMs for Cardiovascular Risk Prediction from Structured Clinical Data
• Abstract summary: Coronary artery disease (CAD) remains one of the leading causes of death globally.<n>We develop a hybrid framework that bridges structured clinical data and natural-language representations for CAD prediction.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
• Abstract: Coronary artery disease (CAD) remains one of the leading causes of death globally, highlighting the need for reliable predictive systems to support early diagnosis and risk assessment. While traditional machine learning models perform well on structured clinical data, large language models (LLMs) present new possibilities to interpret medical information expressed in natural language. In this work, we develop a hybrid framework that bridges structured clinical data and natural-language representations for CAD prediction. Using a publicly available dataset of 1,190 patient records with 11 clinical attributes, structured variables are converted into interpretable feature representations and synthetic clinical narratives using LLMs. A validation pipeline performs reverse extraction of clinical variables and computes a consistency score with the original records, achieving an average fidelity of 94.61%. We then evaluate four conventional machine learning models and compare their performance with LLM-based classification under zero-shot and few-shot prompting settings. We use two LLMs here, GPT and Gemini. Experimental results show that Random Forest achieves the highest accuracy. Despite this advantage, LLM-based classification remains beneficial in real-world clinical settings. This is because LLMs operate directly on natural language patient descriptions, meaning that sensitive numerical patient data such as exact lab values, blood pressure readings, and diagnostic codes are kept private. Findings suggest that combining structured clinical data with LLM-generated narratives can enable new directions for hybrid clinical prediction systems.

Related papers

• From Many to Meaningful: Feature-Guided Zero-Shot Chronic Kidney Disease Screening Using Large Language Models [0.5442955439283729]
  This study examines the feasibility of using large language models (LLMs) for early-stage CKD screening in a zero-shot setting.<n>We propose a feature-guided framework that evaluates LLM performance using a selected set of clinically meaningful, readily available community-based features.<n>Generalizability was assessed across three heterogeneous CKD datasets spanning three countries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-14T02:00:58Z)
• Beyond Scalar Scores: Exploring LLM-based Metrics for Clinical Significance Evaluation in Radiology Reports [49.5225801722164]
  Existing metrics obscure this requirement by reducing report quality to a medically ungrounded scalar.<n>We study this boundary using ReEvalMed benchmark as testbed and evaluate metric-level clinical significance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-17T08:10:30Z)
• PREBA: Surgical Duration Prediction via PCA-Weighted Retrieval-Augmented LLMs and Bayesian Averaging Aggregation [51.96735866702332]
  PREBA is a retrieval-augmented framework that integrates PCA-weighted retrieval and Bayesian averaging aggregation.<n> PREBA significantly improves performance-for instance, reducing MAE by up to 40% and raising R2 from -0.13 to 0.62 over zero-shot inference.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-27T07:19:23Z)
• A Federated and Parameter-Efficient Framework for Large Language Model Training in Medicine [59.78991974851707]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated strong performance on medical benchmarks, including question answering and diagnosis.<n>Most medical LLMs are trained on data from a single institution, which faces limitations in generalizability and safety in heterogeneous systems.<n>We introduce the model-agnostic and parameter-efficient federated learning framework for adapting LLMs to medical applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-29T18:48:21Z)
• Harnessing Large Language Models for Precision Querying and Retrieval-Augmented Knowledge Extraction in Clinical Data Science [3.4325249294405555]
  This study applies Large Language Models (LLMs) to two foundational Electronic Health Record (EHR) data science tasks.<n>We test the ability of LLMs to interact accurately with large structured datasets for analytics.<n>We present a flexible evaluation framework that automatically generates synthetic question and answer pairs tailored to the characteristics of each dataset or task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-28T14:57:36Z)
• Enhancing In-Hospital Mortality Prediction Using Multi-Representational Learning with LLM-Generated Expert Summaries [3.5508427067904864]
  In-hospital mortality (IHM) prediction for ICU patients is critical for timely interventions and efficient resource allocation. This study integrates structured physiological data and clinical notes with Large Language Model (LLM)-generated expert summaries to improve IHM prediction accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-25T16:36:38Z)
• Reasoning-Enhanced Healthcare Predictions with Knowledge Graph Community Retrieval [61.70489848327436]
  KARE is a novel framework that integrates knowledge graph (KG) community-level retrieval with large language models (LLMs) reasoning.<n>Extensive experiments demonstrate that KARE outperforms leading models by up to 10.8-15.0% on MIMIC-III and 12.6-12.7% on MIMIC-IV for mortality and readmission predictions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-06T18:46:28Z)
• ClinicRealm: Re-evaluating Large Language Models with Conventional Machine Learning for Non-Generative Clinical Prediction Tasks [37.544994716002016]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in medicine.<n>However, their utility in non-generative clinical prediction remains under-evaluated.<n>Our ClinicRealm study addresses this by benchmarking 15 GPT-style LLMs, 5 BERT-style models, and 11 traditional methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-26T06:09:10Z)
• TREEMENT: Interpretable Patient-Trial Matching via Personalized Dynamic Tree-Based Memory Network [54.332862955411656]
  Clinical trials are critical for drug development but often suffer from expensive and inefficient patient recruitment. In recent years, machine learning models have been proposed for speeding up patient recruitment via automatically matching patients with clinical trials. We introduce a dynamic tree-based memory network model named TREEMENT to provide accurate and interpretable patient trial matching.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-19T12:35:09Z)
• Self-Verification Improves Few-Shot Clinical Information Extraction [73.6905567014859]
  Large language models (LLMs) have shown the potential to accelerate clinical curation via few-shot in-context learning. They still struggle with issues regarding accuracy and interpretability, especially in mission-critical domains such as health. Here, we explore a general mitigation framework using self-verification, which leverages the LLM to provide provenance for its own extraction and check its own outputs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-30T22:05:11Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.